Technology · head to head
Datadog vs Greenhouse
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Datadog consumption-based pricing model makes costs hard to predict and can scale quickly; Greenhouse core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups
- They diverge on capability: Datadog covers Infrastructure monitoring, Greenhouse covers Applicant tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Datadog and Greenhouse actually diverge.
| Attribute | Datadog | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $15/month | On request |
| Pricing model | Unknown | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, Windows, macOS | Web, Ios, Android, Api |
| Founded | 2010 | 2012 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Technology).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Datadog
- Infrastructure monitoring
- Application performance monitoring
- Log management
- Real user monitoring
- Synthetic monitoring
- Security monitoring
- Network monitoring
- Serverless monitoring
Only in Greenhouse
- Applicant tracking
- Interview scheduling
- Scorecard system
- Job board posting
- Candidate CRM
- Reporting & analytics
- Offer management
- EEO compliance
Both cover
- Slack
- SOC2
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Datadog
- Infrastructure monitoringnot Greenhouse
- Application performancenot Greenhouse
- Security monitoringnot Greenhouse
- Log analysisnot Greenhouse
- Cloud monitoringnot Greenhouse
Greenhouse
- Enterprise hiring and recruiting automationnot Datadog
- Multi-location and multi-team talent acquisitionnot Datadog
- Structured interview process managementnot Datadog
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Datadog
- Consumption-based pricing model makes costs hard to predict and can scale quickly
- Add-on modules significantly increase costs: custom metrics, indexed spans, extended retention
- No free tier for production monitoring
- High costs for organizations with large amounts of log data or high-cardinality metrics
Greenhouse
- Core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups
- Core plan lacks email automation and applicant texting
- Plus plan lacks resume anonymisation and application limits
- Plus plan lacks audit logging and developer tools
- Pricing customised by hiring volume and company size, not published
- Only Pro tier offers audit logs and developer sandbox
Pricing, plan by plan
Datadog
$15/month- Infrastructure Monitoring$15/month
- Host monitoring
- Basic dashboards
- APM$31/month
- Application performance monitoring
- Trace collection
- Log Management$0.1/gb
- Log indexing
- Search and filter
Greenhouse
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Greenhouse review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Datadog if
- You need infrastructure monitoring.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want application performance monitoring.
Choose Greenhouse if
- You need applicant tracking.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want interview scheduling.
Questions people ask
- Is Datadog or Greenhouse better?
- Neither clearly leads. Datadog starts at $15/month and Greenhouse at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Datadog or Greenhouse?
- Datadog starts at $15/month and Greenhouse at On request.
- Does Datadog or Greenhouse run on more platforms?
- Datadog runs on Web, Linux, Windows, macOS. Greenhouse runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- What is Datadog best used for?
- Datadog is most often used for infrastructure monitoring, application performance, security monitoring, log analysis. Of those, infrastructure monitoring and application performance are not what Greenhouse is typically brought in for.
- What can Datadog do that Greenhouse cannot?
- Datadog covers Infrastructure monitoring, Application performance monitoring, Log management, Real user monitoring. Greenhouse covers Applicant tracking, Interview scheduling, Scorecard system, Job board posting. Both handle Slack, SOC2.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Datadog: How is Datadog pricing structured?
Datadog uses consumption-based pricing tied to data volume ingested, hosts monitored, and products enabled. Infrastructure Monitoring starts at $15/host/month, APM at $31/host/month, and Log Management at $0.10/GB for indexed logs.
SourceGreenhouse: How much does Greenhouse cost?
Greenhouse does not publish specific pricing. The company states that pricing is customized based on your hiring needs, hiring volume, organizational complexity, and required features.
SourceDatadog: Does Datadog offer a free tier?
Datadog offers a free trial but not a permanent free tier for production monitoring. Pricing begins with paid plans only.
SourceGreenhouse: What are the Greenhouse pricing tiers?
Greenhouse offers three plan levels: Core (basic hiring structure), Plus (multi-location optimization), and Pro (complex enterprise hiring). Exact pricing requires contacting Greenhouse for a custom quote.
SourceDatadog: What integrations does Datadog support?
Datadog offers 1000+ built-in integrations including AWS, Kubernetes, Docker, Azure, GCP, and most major cloud platforms and services.
SourceGreenhouse: Do all Greenhouse tiers include the same features?
No. Core includes sourcing and scheduling, Plus adds automation and texting, and Pro adds enterprise data configuration and audit logs. All tiers can be customized.
SourceDatadog: Can Datadog monitor Kubernetes clusters?
Yes. The Datadog Agent runs as a DaemonSet to provide real-time visibility into pods, nodes, deployments, and control-plane health across major Kubernetes distributions including EKS, AKS, GKE, OpenShift, and others.
SourceDatadog: How can I reduce Datadog costs?
Datadog bills based on indexed logs, custom metrics, and high-cardinality tags. Costs can be unpredictable and may run 2-3x estimates. Prepaying annually can secure 5-15% discounts.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Datadog vs Sentry
- Datadog vs PagerDuty
- Datadog vs Dashlane
- Datadog vs LogRocket
- Datadog vs Okta
- Datadog vs Auth0
- Datadog vs Segment
- Datadog vs GitLab
- Datadog vs Coda
- Datadog vs ClickUp
- Datadog vs Linear
- Datadog vs Docker
- Datadog vs Eclipse
- Datadog vs Jenkins
- Datadog vs Lovable
- Datadog vs Miro
- Datadog vs Personetics
- Datadog vs Plane
- Datadog vs Asana
- Datadog vs Figma
- Datadog vs Aha!
- Datadog vs Postgres
- Datadog vs Amplitude
- Datadog vs Mixpanel
- Datadog vs Pendo
- Datadog vs PostHog
- Datadog vs Postman
- Datadog vs Raycast
- Datadog vs Superhuman
- Datadog vs Vim
- Datadog vs Whimsical
- Datadog vs Apache Hadoop
- Greenhouse vs Sentry
- Greenhouse vs PagerDuty
- Greenhouse vs Dashlane
- Greenhouse vs LogRocket
- Greenhouse vs Okta
- Greenhouse vs Auth0
- Greenhouse vs Segment
- Greenhouse vs GitLab
- Greenhouse vs Coda
- Greenhouse vs ClickUp
- Greenhouse vs Linear
- Greenhouse vs Docker
- Greenhouse vs Eclipse
- Greenhouse vs Jenkins
- Greenhouse vs Lovable
- Greenhouse vs Miro
- Greenhouse vs Personetics
- Greenhouse vs Plane
- Greenhouse vs Asana
- Greenhouse vs Figma
- Greenhouse vs Aha!
- Greenhouse vs Postgres
- Greenhouse vs Amplitude
- Greenhouse vs Mixpanel
- Greenhouse vs Pendo
- Greenhouse vs PostHog
- Greenhouse vs Postman
- Greenhouse vs Raycast
- Greenhouse vs Superhuman
- Greenhouse vs Vim
- Greenhouse vs Whimsical
- Greenhouse vs Apache Hadoop


