Databases · head to head
Google Cloud SQL vs Keycloak

Google Cloud SQL
Databases
Fully managed relational database service for MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQL Server
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Keycloak is an open-source IAM platform supporting OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.
- Keycloak is free; Google Cloud SQL starts at $25/mo.
- Where Google Cloud SQL falls short: locked into Google Cloud ecosystem with limited cross-cloud portability.
- Where Keycloak falls short: requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Google Cloud SQL and Keycloak actually diverge.
| Attribute | Google Cloud SQL | Keycloak |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Open-source |
| Platforms | Web | Self-hosted, Linux, Windows, API |
| Category | Databases | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
Not yet recorded: founded for Keycloak.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Google Cloud SQL
- High Availability
- Automated Backups
- Point-in-time Recovery
- Encryption
- Regional/Zonal Instances
- Read Replicas
- Private IP
- BigQuery
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that Google Cloud SQL does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Google Cloud SQL
- Transaction processingnot Keycloak
- Data storagenot Keycloak
- Application backendnot Keycloak
- Reportingnot Keycloak
- Data analyticsnot Keycloak
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Google Cloud SQL
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Google Cloud SQL
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Google Cloud SQL
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Google Cloud SQL
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Google Cloud SQL
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Google Cloud SQL
- Locked into Google Cloud ecosystem with limited cross-cloud portability
- Pay-as-you-go pricing can become expensive with unpredictable workloads
- Limited customization options compared to self-managed databases
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Pricing, plan by plan
Google Cloud SQL
Free- Free TierFree
- db-f1-micro instance
- 30GB storage
- Limited usage
- Standard$25/mo
- High availability
- Automated backups
- Point-in-time recovery
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Google Cloud SQL if
- You need high availability.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want automated backups.
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Linux, Windows, API.
Questions people ask
- Is Google Cloud SQL or Keycloak better?
- Neither clearly leads. Google Cloud SQL starts at Free and Keycloak at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Google Cloud SQL or Keycloak?
- Google Cloud SQL starts at Free and Keycloak at Free.
- Does Google Cloud SQL or Keycloak run on more platforms?
- Google Cloud SQL runs on Web. Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Linux, Windows, API.
- Can I use Google Cloud SQL for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Google Cloud SQL best used for?
- Google Cloud SQL is most often used for transaction processing, data storage, application backend, reporting. Of those, transaction processing and data storage are not what Keycloak is typically brought in for.
- What can Google Cloud SQL do that Keycloak cannot?
- Google Cloud SQL covers High Availability, Automated Backups, Point-in-time Recovery, Encryption.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Google Cloud SQL: What database engines does Google Cloud SQL support?
Google Cloud SQL supports MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQL Server. Users can choose their preferred engine when provisioning an instance and Google handles automated backups, replication, patching, and scaling.
SourceKeycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceGoogle Cloud SQL: Does Google Cloud SQL have a free tier?
Google Cloud SQL does not have a free tier, though new users receive free trial credits from Google Cloud Platform. Pricing is based on compute resources (CPU and memory) and storage used, with options for committed use discounts.
SourceKeycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceGoogle Cloud SQL: Can Google Cloud SQL scale automatically?
Yes. Cloud SQL automatically scales database storage and compute resources to handle increased workloads without manual intervention, and includes automated backups and high availability configurations.
SourceKeycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceRelated pages
More on Google Cloud SQL
Other head to heads
- Google Cloud SQL vs Amazon RDS
- Google Cloud SQL vs Azure SQL
- Google Cloud SQL vs Cockroach Labs
- Google Cloud SQL vs Aiven
- Google Cloud SQL vs PostgreSQL
- Google Cloud SQL vs MariaDB
- Google Cloud SQL vs DataStax
- Google Cloud SQL vs Typesense
- Google Cloud SQL vs Valkey
- Google Cloud SQL vs Apache Doris
- Google Cloud SQL vs Apache Hadoop
- Google Cloud SQL vs Apache Spark
- Google Cloud SQL vs Amazon Aurora
- Google Cloud SQL vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Google Cloud SQL vs Postgres
- Google Cloud SQL vs Apache Solr
- Google Cloud SQL vs Amazon Redshift
- Google Cloud SQL vs CosmosDB
- Google Cloud SQL vs Jenkins
- Google Cloud SQL vs Atlantis
- Google Cloud SQL vs Soketi
- Google Cloud SQL vs Kubernetes
- Google Cloud SQL vs GitLab
- Google Cloud SQL vs Vite
- Google Cloud SQL vs Depot
- Google Cloud SQL vs Ansible
- Google Cloud SQL vs Buildkite
- Google Cloud SQL vs Coder
- Google Cloud SQL vs Bitbucket
- Google Cloud SQL vs Sweep
- Google Cloud SQL vs Git
- Google Cloud SQL vs GitHub Desktop
- Google Cloud SQL vs GoLand
- Google Cloud SQL vs Hookdeck
- Google Cloud SQL vs Istio
- Google Cloud SQL vs JFrog Artifactory
- Keycloak vs Amazon RDS
- Keycloak vs Azure SQL
- Keycloak vs Cockroach Labs
- Keycloak vs Aiven
- Keycloak vs PostgreSQL
- Keycloak vs MariaDB
- Keycloak vs DataStax
- Keycloak vs Typesense
- Keycloak vs Valkey
- Keycloak vs Apache Doris
- Keycloak vs Apache Hadoop
- Keycloak vs Apache Spark
- Keycloak vs Amazon Aurora
- Keycloak vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Keycloak vs Postgres
- Keycloak vs Apache Solr
- Keycloak vs Amazon Redshift
- Keycloak vs CosmosDB
- Keycloak vs Jenkins
- Keycloak vs Atlantis
- Keycloak vs Soketi
- Keycloak vs Kubernetes
- Keycloak vs GitLab
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Depot
- Keycloak vs Ansible
- Keycloak vs Buildkite
- Keycloak vs Coder
- Keycloak vs Bitbucket
- Keycloak vs Sweep
- Keycloak vs Git
- Keycloak vs GitHub Desktop
- Keycloak vs GoLand
- Keycloak vs Hookdeck
- Keycloak vs Istio
- Keycloak vs JFrog Artifactory
