Developer Tools · head to head
GNAT Pro vs Tenable

GNAT Pro
Developer Tools
Software development environments and toolchains for Ada, C/C++ and Rust
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Tenable
Cybersecurity
AI-powered exposure management platform for unified security visibility
- From
- $3500/year
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GNAT Pro no pricing published on website; requires contacting AdaCore directly for quotes; Tenable pricing starts at $3500/year for Tenable One VM, expensive for small organizations
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GNAT Pro and Tenable actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GNAT Pro
Nothing recorded that Tenable does not also cover.
Only in Tenable
- Unified attack surface mapping
- Exposure intelligence enrichment
- Tenable Hexa AI orchestration
- Cloud Exposure (CNAPP)
- OT Exposure
- Identity Exposure
- Vulnerability Management
- Attack Surface Management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GNAT Pro
- Building certified avionics software meeting DO-178B/C standardsnot Tenable
- Developing automotive embedded systems with ISO-26262 compliancenot Tenable
- Integrating Ada, C/C++, and Rust components in single codebasenot Tenable
- Managing software supply chain vulnerabilities and SBOMsnot Tenable
- Supporting long-lived software systems spanning decadesnot Tenable
Tenable
- Comprehensive vulnerability scanning for enterprise networksnot GNAT Pro
- Cloud security monitoring and compliance for AWS, Azure, GCPnot GNAT Pro
- Identity and access management risk assessmentnot GNAT Pro
- Operational technology security for industrial systemsnot GNAT Pro
- Attack surface management for third-party risknot GNAT Pro
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GNAT Pro
- No pricing published on website; requires contacting AdaCore directly for quotes
- Vendor indicates per-user, per-year subscription model but does not disclose specific costs
Tenable
- Pricing starts at $3500/year for Tenable One VM, expensive for small organizations
- Many enterprise features require custom quote and sales engagement
- Cloud Exposure, OT Exposure, and other modules have no published pricing
- Multi-year contracts common, limiting flexibility
- Setup and configuration complexity for enterprise deployments
Pricing, plan by plan
GNAT Pro
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GNAT Pro review.
Tenable
$3500/year- Tenable One Vulnerability Management$3500/year
- Per 100 assets
- Multi-year discounts available
- Tenable One Web App Scanning$3578/year
- Per 5 FQDNs
- Annual subscription
- Nessus Professional$4790/year
- Vulnerability scanning
- Multi-year discounts available
- Optional advanced support: $400/year
- Nessus Expert$6790/year
- Advanced vulnerability scanning
- Multi-year discounts available
- Optional advanced support: $400/year
Which should you pick?
Choose GNAT Pro if
Nothing in the data separates GNAT Pro from Tenable on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose Tenable if
- You need unified attack surface mapping.
- You work on Cloud, Web.
- You also want exposure intelligence enrichment.
Questions people ask
- Is GNAT Pro or Tenable better?
- Neither clearly leads. GNAT Pro starts at On request and Tenable at $3500/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GNAT Pro or Tenable?
- GNAT Pro starts at On request and Tenable at $3500/year.
- Does GNAT Pro or Tenable run on more platforms?
- GNAT Pro runs on Web. Tenable runs on Cloud, Web.
- What is GNAT Pro best used for?
- GNAT Pro is most often used for building certified avionics software meeting do-178b/c standards, developing automotive embedded systems with iso-26262 compliance, integrating ada, c/c++, and rust components in single codebase, managing software supply chain vulnerabilities and sboms. Of those, building certified avionics software meeting do-178b/c standards and developing automotive embedded systems with iso-26262 compliance are not what Tenable is typically brought in for.
- What can GNAT Pro do that Tenable cannot?
- Tenable covers Unified attack surface mapping, Exposure intelligence enrichment, Tenable Hexa AI orchestration, Cloud Exposure (CNAPP).
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GNAT Pro: How much does GNAT Pro cost?
GNAT Pro pricing is not published on the website. Customers must request a pricing quote by contacting AdaCore directly or speaking with a GNAT Pro expert.
SourceTenable: How is Tenable One pricing structured?
Tenable One Vulnerability Management costs $3500/year per 100 assets. Web App Scanning is $3578/year per 5 FQDNs. Multi-year discounts are available.
SourceGNAT Pro: What is GNAT Pro licensing model?
GNAT Pro is sold on a per-user, per-year basis with no license locks. Customers can request pricing for their specific needs.
SourceTenable: What is the difference between Nessus Professional and Nessus Expert?
Nessus Professional costs $4790/year and provides core vulnerability scanning. Nessus Expert costs $6790/year and offers advanced scanning capabilities.
SourceTenable: Are custom support and training available for Tenable?
Yes. Optional advanced support is available for $400/year. Training courses range from $275-$385/year.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- GNAT Pro vs CLion
- GNAT Pro vs Rust
- GNAT Pro vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- GNAT Pro vs Keil MDK
- GNAT Pro vs RAD Studio
- GNAT Pro vs Penpot
- GNAT Pro vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- GNAT Pro vs Helix
- GNAT Pro vs JetBrains Rider
- GNAT Pro vs Coder
- GNAT Pro vs StackBlitz
- GNAT Pro vs ConfigCat
- GNAT Pro vs Nix
- GNAT Pro vs Nixpacks
- GNAT Pro vs Octopus Deploy
- GNAT Pro vs Okteto
- GNAT Pro vs OpsLevel
- GNAT Pro vs PartyKit
- GNAT Pro vs Netwrix
- GNAT Pro vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- GNAT Pro vs Qualys VMDR
- GNAT Pro vs Aikido
- GNAT Pro vs Arnica
- GNAT Pro vs Doppler
- GNAT Pro vs Chainguard
- GNAT Pro vs Recorded Future
- GNAT Pro vs Speakeasy
- GNAT Pro vs Sysdig
- GNAT Pro vs Endor Labs
- GNAT Pro vs Tanium
- GNAT Pro vs Enpass
- GNAT Pro vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- GNAT Pro vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- GNAT Pro vs Fortinet FortiGate
- GNAT Pro vs HID Global
- GNAT Pro vs IBM QRadar
- Tenable vs CLion
- Tenable vs Rust
- Tenable vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Tenable vs Keil MDK
- Tenable vs RAD Studio
- Tenable vs Penpot
- Tenable vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Tenable vs Helix
- Tenable vs JetBrains Rider
- Tenable vs Coder
- Tenable vs StackBlitz
- Tenable vs ConfigCat
- Tenable vs Nix
- Tenable vs Nixpacks
- Tenable vs Octopus Deploy
- Tenable vs Okteto
- Tenable vs OpsLevel
- Tenable vs PartyKit
- Tenable vs Netwrix
- Tenable vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Tenable vs Qualys VMDR
- Tenable vs Aikido
- Tenable vs Arnica
- Tenable vs Doppler
- Tenable vs Chainguard
- Tenable vs Recorded Future
- Tenable vs Speakeasy
- Tenable vs Sysdig
- Tenable vs Endor Labs
- Tenable vs Tanium
- Tenable vs Enpass
- Tenable vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Tenable vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Tenable vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Tenable vs HID Global
- Tenable vs IBM QRadar
