Cybersecurity · head to head
Arnica vs GNAT Pro

Arnica
Cybersecurity
AI-native application security platform detecting and fixing vulnerabilities across the SDLC
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

GNAT Pro
Developer Tools
Software development environments and toolchains for Ada, C/C++ and Rust
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Arnica has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Arnica per-identity pricing ($25-$50/person/year) requires tracking active developers; GNAT Pro no pricing published on website; requires contacting AdaCore directly for quotes
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Arnica and GNAT Pro actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Arnica
- AI SAST
- Software Composition Analysis
- Secrets detection
- IaC scanning
- Container scanning
- SBOM generation
- Agentic rules
- Pipelineless integration
Only in GNAT Pro
Nothing recorded that Arnica does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Arnica
- Detecting AI-generated vulnerabilities in Copilot and Cursor suggestionsnot GNAT Pro
- Finding hardcoded secrets before they reach productionnot GNAT Pro
- Mapping container vulnerabilities back to source codenot GNAT Pro
- Generating SBOM for supply chain compliance requirementsnot GNAT Pro
- Scanning infrastructure-as-code for misconfiguration risksnot GNAT Pro
GNAT Pro
- Building certified avionics software meeting DO-178B/C standardsnot Arnica
- Developing automotive embedded systems with ISO-26262 compliancenot Arnica
- Integrating Ada, C/C++, and Rust components in single codebasenot Arnica
- Managing software supply chain vulnerabilities and SBOMsnot Arnica
- Supporting long-lived software systems spanning decadesnot Arnica
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Arnica
- Per-identity pricing ($25-$50/person/year) requires tracking active developers
- Overage identity tracking via 90-day PR activity can be unpredictable
- Free plan limited to weekly updates, requiring upgrade for real-time scanning
- Advanced add-ons (Image Scanning, AI SAST, Agentic Rules Enforcer) pricing not published
- On-premises deployment limited to Enterprise tier
GNAT Pro
- No pricing published on website; requires contacting AdaCore directly for quotes
- Vendor indicates per-user, per-year subscription model but does not disclose specific costs
Pricing, plan by plan
Arnica
Free- FreeFree
- No credit card required
- 14-day trial available
- Weekly risk identification updates
- Core Business$360/year
- Monthly billing option at $30/identity/month
- Annual billing at $25/identity/month (17% discount)
- Real-time risk scanning and notifications
- Core Enterprise$720/year
- Monthly billing option at $60/identity/month
- Annual billing at $50/identity/month (17% discount)
- All Core Business features
GNAT Pro
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GNAT Pro review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Arnica if
- You need ai sast.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, GitHub, IDE.
- You also want software composition analysis.
Choose GNAT Pro if
Nothing in the data separates GNAT Pro from Arnica on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is Arnica or GNAT Pro better?
- Neither clearly leads. Arnica starts at Free and GNAT Pro at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Arnica or GNAT Pro?
- Arnica has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Arnica and On request for GNAT Pro.
- Does Arnica or GNAT Pro run on more platforms?
- Arnica runs on Web, GitHub, IDE. GNAT Pro runs on Web.
- Can I use Arnica for free?
- Yes. Arnica has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. GNAT Pro starts at On request.
- What is Arnica best used for?
- Arnica is most often used for detecting ai-generated vulnerabilities in copilot and cursor suggestions, finding hardcoded secrets before they reach production, mapping container vulnerabilities back to source code, generating sbom for supply chain compliance requirements. Of those, detecting ai-generated vulnerabilities in copilot and cursor suggestions and finding hardcoded secrets before they reach production are not what GNAT Pro is typically brought in for.
- What can Arnica do that GNAT Pro cannot?
- Arnica covers AI SAST, Software Composition Analysis, Secrets detection, IaC scanning.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Arnica: How are identities defined in Arnica pricing?
Identities are any users and other contributing entities that contributed code and/or had PR activity during the last 90 days. This ensures billing matches active developers.
SourceGNAT Pro: How much does GNAT Pro cost?
GNAT Pro pricing is not published on the website. Customers must request a pricing quote by contacting AdaCore directly or speaking with a GNAT Pro expert.
SourceArnica: What is the annual discount?
Annual prepayment offers approximately 17% savings versus monthly billing. Core Business annual is $300/identity versus $360 for monthly.
SourceGNAT Pro: What is GNAT Pro licensing model?
GNAT Pro is sold on a per-user, per-year basis with no license locks. Customers can request pricing for their specific needs.
SourceArnica: Can I cancel or downgrade Arnica anytime?
Yes. Subscriptions can be cancelled or downgraded at any time. Overage identities receive automatic protection with true-up invoicing.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Arnica vs Semgrep
- Arnica vs Snyk
- Arnica vs Chainguard
- Arnica vs Tenable
- Arnica vs Doppler
- Arnica vs Aikido
- Arnica vs Endor Labs
- Arnica vs Trivy
- Arnica vs Socket
- Arnica vs Infisical
- Arnica vs Bitwarden
- Arnica vs RoboForm
- Arnica vs Sardine
- Arnica vs Semperis
- Arnica vs SentinelOne
- Arnica vs Shufti Pro
- Arnica vs Nessus
- Arnica vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Arnica vs CLion
- Arnica vs Rust
- Arnica vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Arnica vs Keil MDK
- Arnica vs RAD Studio
- Arnica vs Penpot
- Arnica vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Arnica vs Helix
- Arnica vs JetBrains Rider
- Arnica vs Coder
- Arnica vs StackBlitz
- Arnica vs ConfigCat
- Arnica vs Nix
- Arnica vs Nixpacks
- Arnica vs Octopus Deploy
- Arnica vs Okteto
- Arnica vs OpsLevel
- Arnica vs PartyKit
- GNAT Pro vs Semgrep
- GNAT Pro vs Snyk
- GNAT Pro vs Chainguard
- GNAT Pro vs Tenable
- GNAT Pro vs Doppler
- GNAT Pro vs Aikido
- GNAT Pro vs Endor Labs
- GNAT Pro vs Trivy
- GNAT Pro vs Socket
- GNAT Pro vs Infisical
- GNAT Pro vs Bitwarden
- GNAT Pro vs RoboForm
- GNAT Pro vs Sardine
- GNAT Pro vs Semperis
- GNAT Pro vs SentinelOne
- GNAT Pro vs Shufti Pro
- GNAT Pro vs Nessus
- GNAT Pro vs SentinelOne Singularity
- GNAT Pro vs CLion
- GNAT Pro vs Rust
- GNAT Pro vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- GNAT Pro vs Keil MDK
- GNAT Pro vs RAD Studio
- GNAT Pro vs Penpot
- GNAT Pro vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- GNAT Pro vs Helix
- GNAT Pro vs JetBrains Rider
- GNAT Pro vs Coder
- GNAT Pro vs StackBlitz
- GNAT Pro vs ConfigCat
- GNAT Pro vs Nix
- GNAT Pro vs Nixpacks
- GNAT Pro vs Octopus Deploy
- GNAT Pro vs Okteto
- GNAT Pro vs OpsLevel
- GNAT Pro vs PartyKit
