Developer Tools · head to head
Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Zeta

Ona (formerly Gitpod)
Developer Tools
Cloud development environments repositioned as a control plane for software engineering agents
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Zeta
Technology
Cloud native credit card processing and core banking from Bhavin Turakhia's Zeta
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Ona (formerly Gitpod) has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Ona (formerly Gitpod) acquisition risk has already materialised: the company closed a sale to OpenAI on 10 August 2026 and now sits inside the Codex team, so nothing public guarantees pricing, continuity or neutrality between model vendors beyond honouring existing commitments.; Zeta it competes against card processors with decades of production track record, and in card processing an outage is a public event, so a shorter operational history is a genuine risk factor rather than a technicality.
- They diverge on capability: Ona (formerly Gitpod) covers Ephemeral environments, Zeta covers Tachyon card processing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ona (formerly Gitpod) and Zeta actually diverge.
| Attribute | Ona (formerly Gitpod) | Zeta |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Per month by compute unit | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS, Google Cloud Platform | Web, API, Cloud, iOS, Android |
| Category | Developer Tools | Technology |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Ephemeral environments
- Agent sessions
- Bring your own cloud
- Devcontainer standard
- Compute unit budgeting
- Enterprise identity
Only in Zeta
- Tachyon card processing
- Real time authorisation
- Rewards and offers engine
- Core banking modules
- Programme configuration
- Mobile and web SDKs
- Fraud and controls
- Cloud deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Giving a large engineering team identical, disposable environments so onboarding is a link rather than a two day setupnot Zeta
- Running several coding agents in parallel against real databases and services instead of on a laptopnot Zeta
- Keeping source code off contractor and offshore laptops by moving the whole environment into a controlled accountnot Zeta
- Reproducing a hard-to-configure toolchain for a short-lived project without polluting anyone machinenot Zeta
Zeta
- A United States bank whose card platform makes launching a new rewards product a multi quarter vendor projectnot Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- An issuer that wants authorisation level controls and real time data rather than end of day filesnot Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- A large fintech launching a credit card programme at scale with custom product logicnot Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- A bank consolidating card and deposit processing onto one modern platformnot Ona (formerly Gitpod)
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Acquisition risk has already materialised: the company closed a sale to OpenAI on 10 August 2026 and now sits inside the Codex team, so nothing public guarantees pricing, continuity or neutrality between model vendors beyond honouring existing commitments.
- Two disruptive changes of direction inside a year, from development environments to agent orchestration and then from independence to acquisition, mean the product a browser IDE buyer originally chose no longer exists in that form.
- The Gitpod Classic sunset on 15 October 2025 required manual conversion of configuration, hand-moved secrets, self-rescued workspace data and a brand new account, which is the clearest available precedent for how the vendor handles deprecation.
- Community self-hosting is finished: the AGPL-3.0 repository is deprecated by its own README, and self-hosted now means a vendor-operated install in your AWS or GCP account, with no Azure, no on-premises and no air-gapped path.
- Pricing is difficult to model because it runs on a compute unit currency where subscription credits expire at the end of the month, the mapping from units to actual compute is not published on the pricing page, and Enterprise is quotation only.
Zeta
- It competes against card processors with decades of production track record, and in card processing an outage is a public event, so a shorter operational history is a genuine risk factor rather than a technicality.
- Contracts are enterprise scale and quoted with volume minimums, which puts it out of reach of small issuers who would otherwise benefit most from modern tooling.
- A card portfolio migration runs twelve to twenty four months at minimum, during which the issuer runs two platforms and pays for both.
- Zeta is a processor rather than a licence holder, so network membership, BIN sponsorship and regulatory obligations remain entirely with the issuer.
- Public references for large live United States production volumes are fewer than the announcements imply, so diligence should insist on active account counts and uptime history rather than partnership press releases.
Pricing, plan by plan
Ona (formerly Gitpod)
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 3 parallel environments
- Machines up to 4 vCPU, 16 GB memory and 80 GB disk
- Ona Cloud multi-tenant only
- Core$20/month
- From 20 US dollars a month, up to 100 team members
- Includes 80 to 2,200 recurring compute units a month depending on tier
- Additional units from 10 US dollars per 40 units
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Single-tenant deployment in your own AWS or GCP account
- SAML and OIDC single sign-on
- Dedicated account management and forward deployed engineers
Zeta
On request- Tachyon platform$undefined/year
- Quoted per institution, commonly on active accounts or transaction volume
- Implementation for a card portfolio migration measured in quarters to years
- Minimum volume commitments typical on enterprise contracts
Which should you pick?
Choose Ona (formerly Gitpod) if
- You need ephemeral environments.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS, Google Cloud Platform.
- You also want agent sessions.
Choose Zeta if
- You need tachyon card processing.
- You work on Web, API, Cloud, iOS, Android.
- You also want real time authorisation.
Questions people ask
- Is Ona (formerly Gitpod) or Zeta better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ona (formerly Gitpod) starts at Free and Zeta at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ona (formerly Gitpod) or Zeta?
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Ona (formerly Gitpod) and On request for Zeta.
- Does Ona (formerly Gitpod) or Zeta run on more platforms?
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) runs on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS, Google Cloud Platform. Zeta runs on Web, API, Cloud, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Ona (formerly Gitpod) for free?
- Yes. Ona (formerly Gitpod) has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Zeta starts at On request.
- What is Ona (formerly Gitpod) best used for?
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) is most often used for giving a large engineering team identical, disposable environments so onboarding is a link rather than a two day setup, running several coding agents in parallel against real databases and services instead of on a laptop, keeping source code off contractor and offshore laptops by moving the whole environment into a controlled account, reproducing a hard-to-configure toolchain for a short-lived project without polluting anyone machine. Of those, giving a large engineering team identical, disposable environments so onboarding is a link rather than a two day setup and running several coding agents in parallel against real databases and services instead of on a laptop are not what Zeta is typically brought in for.
- What can Ona (formerly Gitpod) do that Zeta cannot?
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) covers Ephemeral environments, Agent sessions, Bring your own cloud, Devcontainer standard. Zeta covers Tachyon card processing, Real time authorisation, Rewards and offers engine, Core banking modules.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ona (formerly Gitpod): Is Gitpod still called Gitpod?
No. It rebranded to Ona in September 2025, and gitpod.io now redirects to ona.com. The company was acquired by OpenAI in a deal that closed on 10 August 2026.
Zeta: Which Zeta is this?
The banking technology company founded by Bhavin Turakhia, which builds the Tachyon card processing and core banking platform. Not any similarly named payroll or accounting product.
Ona (formerly Gitpod): Can I still self-host it for free?
No. The AGPL-3.0 self-hosted project is deprecated by its own README. What is offered now is a vendor-operated single-tenant install in your AWS or GCP account on the Enterprise plan.
Zeta: What is its strongest use case?
United States credit card issuing and processing, where legacy platforms make product changes slow and expensive.
Ona (formerly Gitpod): What happened to Gitpod Classic?
Pay-as-you-go Classic was switched off on 15 October 2025. Migration required converting gitpod.yml to devcontainer.json, moving secrets by hand, downloading workspace data before the cutoff and creating a new account.
Zeta: Does Zeta provide the BIN or licence?
No. It processes. Network membership, BIN sponsorship and regulatory obligations stay with the issuer.
Ona (formerly Gitpod): What does it cost?
Core starts at 20 US dollars a month and includes a monthly allowance of Ona Compute Units, with more from 10 dollars per 40 units. Subscription credits expire monthly. Enterprise is quoted.
Related pages
More on Ona (formerly Gitpod)
Other head to heads
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Coder
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs CodeSandbox
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs StackBlitz
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Namespace
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Daytona
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Earthly
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Nixpacks
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Spacelift
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Atlantis
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Backstage
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs ConfigCat
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Xlinesoft
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs GNU Emacs
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Keil MDK
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Vite
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Bazel
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Finxact
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Thought Machine
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Alkami
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Apache Spark
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Nagios XI
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Shortcut
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Linear
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Datadog
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Greenhouse
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Google Chrome
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Mozilla Firefox
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Confluent Cloud
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Heap
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Microsoft Edge
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Netlify
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Productboard
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Sentry
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Trino
- Zeta vs Coder
- Zeta vs CodeSandbox
- Zeta vs StackBlitz
- Zeta vs Namespace
- Zeta vs Daytona
- Zeta vs Earthly
- Zeta vs Nixpacks
- Zeta vs Spacelift
- Zeta vs Atlantis
- Zeta vs Backstage
- Zeta vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Zeta vs ConfigCat
- Zeta vs Xlinesoft
- Zeta vs GNU Emacs
- Zeta vs Keil MDK
- Zeta vs Vite
- Zeta vs Bazel
- Zeta vs Finxact
- Zeta vs Thought Machine
- Zeta vs Alkami
- Zeta vs Apache Spark
- Zeta vs Nagios XI
- Zeta vs Shortcut
- Zeta vs Linear
- Zeta vs Datadog
- Zeta vs Greenhouse
- Zeta vs Google Chrome
- Zeta vs Mozilla Firefox
- Zeta vs Confluent Cloud
- Zeta vs Heap
- Zeta vs Microsoft Edge
- Zeta vs Netlify
- Zeta vs Productboard
- Zeta vs Sentry
- Zeta vs Trino
