ERP · head to head
GEP SMART vs IFS Applications

GEP SMART
ERP
Enterprise source-to-pay from a vendor that also sells the consulting and the outsourced procurement team
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

IFS Applications
ERP
ERP for asset-heavy and service-heavy industries, now delivered as IFS Cloud
- From
- $3000/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GEP SMART gEP sells the software, the consulting and the outsourced procurement team, so the vendor measuring the savings is often the vendor delivering them, which makes independent verification difficult.; IFS Applications iFS Applications 10 is the older line and the current product is IFS Cloud, so an existing customer's move is a re-implementation with data migration and process redesign rather than an upgrade, and it needs its own budget and business case.
- They diverge on capability: GEP SMART covers Unified source-to-pay, IFS Applications covers Enterprise asset management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GEP SMART and IFS Applications actually diverge.
| Attribute | GEP SMART | IFS Applications |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $3000/month |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Cloud, Web, Mobile |
| Founded | Unknown | 1983 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (ERP).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GEP SMART
- Unified source-to-pay
- Spend and category analytics
- Savings tracking
- Supplier risk management
- GEP QUANTUM
- Managed services attachment
Only in IFS Applications
- Enterprise asset management
- Field service management
- Project-based operations
- Manufacturing
- Maintenance, repair and overhaul
- Financials
- Supply chain
- Regular release cadence
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GEP SMART
- An enterprise that needs category expertise as well as software and would otherwise run two procurement processesnot IFS Applications
- A company outsourcing tactical sourcing while retaining strategic categories, using one platform across bothnot IFS Applications
- A multinational consolidating regional procurement systems onto one spend taxonomynot IFS Applications
- An organisation that needs savings tracked and reconciled against realised spend rather than claimed in a spreadsheetnot IFS Applications
IFS Applications
- An aerospace or defence organisation performing regulated maintenance, repair and overhaul with full traceabilitynot GEP SMART
- A utility or energy company managing distributed physical assets and the field crews who maintain themnot GEP SMART
- A manufacturer that services and maintains the equipment it sells and wants that revenue in the same systemnot GEP SMART
- An engineering or construction firm running long projects where cost control and progress billing drive the financesnot GEP SMART
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GEP SMART
- GEP sells the software, the consulting and the outsourced procurement team, so the vendor measuring the savings is often the vendor delivering them, which makes independent verification difficult.
- Nothing is published and reported entry points around half a million US dollars a year exclude implementation, which GEP typically delivers itself rather than through a competing integrator.
- Implementation being delivered by the vendor limits the pool of independent consultants who can advise you during the project or take over afterwards.
- Combined software and services engagements are difficult to unwind, because replacing the platform also means rebuilding procurement capability the outsourcer was providing.
- The platform is scoped for very large enterprises, so mid-market organisations face both a price and a complexity floor that no module selection brings down.
IFS Applications
- IFS Applications 10 is the older line and the current product is IFS Cloud, so an existing customer's move is a re-implementation with data migration and process redesign rather than an upgrade, and it needs its own budget and business case.
- The partner and consultant pool is far smaller than for SAP, Oracle or Microsoft, so experienced implementers are scarce, expensive and concentrated in a few firms, and availability rather than price often sets your start date.
- IFS Cloud ships on a regular release cadence, so you must fund regression testing and change communication repeatedly rather than treating an upgrade as an occasional event you can plan around a quiet quarter.
- Deployment is commonly private cloud or on premise rather than shared multi-tenant, so infrastructure management, environment refreshes and operational responsibility remain yours or your partner's.
- The product's depth is in asset-heavy and service-heavy industries, and outside those sectors, for example in retail or consumer goods, you would be paying for capability you do not need while competing products fit better.
Pricing, plan by plan
GEP SMART
On request- GEP SMART$undefined/year
- Scaled by managed spend volume, modules and user count
- Third parties report deployments starting around 500,000 USD per year
- Frequently bundled with GEP consulting or managed services
IFS Applications
$3000/month- Core$3000/month
- Financial management
- Field service
- Asset management
- Premium$5500/month
- Advanced modules
- IoT integration
- Priority support
Which should you pick?
Choose GEP SMART if
- You need unified source-to-pay.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want spend and category analytics.
Choose IFS Applications if
- You need enterprise asset management.
- You work on Cloud, Web, Mobile.
- You also want field service management.
Questions people ask
- Is GEP SMART or IFS Applications better?
- Neither clearly leads. GEP SMART starts at On request and IFS Applications at $3000/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GEP SMART or IFS Applications?
- GEP SMART starts at On request and IFS Applications at $3000/month.
- Does GEP SMART or IFS Applications run on more platforms?
- GEP SMART runs on Web, iOS, Android. IFS Applications runs on Cloud, Web, Mobile.
- What is GEP SMART best used for?
- GEP SMART is most often used for an enterprise that needs category expertise as well as software and would otherwise run two procurement processes, a company outsourcing tactical sourcing while retaining strategic categories, using one platform across both, a multinational consolidating regional procurement systems onto one spend taxonomy, an organisation that needs savings tracked and reconciled against realised spend rather than claimed in a spreadsheet. Of those, an enterprise that needs category expertise as well as software and would otherwise run two procurement processes and a company outsourcing tactical sourcing while retaining strategic categories, using one platform across both are not what IFS Applications is typically brought in for.
- What can GEP SMART do that IFS Applications cannot?
- GEP SMART covers Unified source-to-pay, Spend and category analytics, Savings tracking, Supplier risk management. IFS Applications covers Enterprise asset management, Field service management, Project-based operations, Manufacturing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GEP SMART: Is GEP just a software company?
No. It sells procurement software, procurement consulting and outsourced procurement operations, and deals often combine all three.
IFS Applications: Is IFS Applications still current?
No. IFS Applications 10 is the older line and IFS Cloud is the current product, which combined the separate ERP, asset management and field service products into one. Check your support dates for Applications and plan the transition explicitly.
GEP SMART: What does GEP SMART cost?
Not published. Third parties report deployments from around 500,000 USD a year, scaled by managed spend, modules and users.
IFS Applications: Why choose IFS over SAP or Oracle?
Because asset management and field service are in the core rather than integrated alongside. If your business revolves around maintaining physical assets or dispatching technicians, that single data model removes a class of integration and reconciliation work. If it does not, the argument largely disappears.
GEP SMART: Who implements it?
GEP typically does, which shortens the project but reduces independent advice during and after it.
IFS Applications: What does the move from IFS Applications to IFS Cloud involve?
Data migration, reconfiguration and retraining, closer to a new implementation than an upgrade. Get a scoped estimate before committing, and be clear about how long your existing version remains supported so the deadline is a known quantity.
GEP SMART: How does it compare with Ivalua?
Both are single-platform enterprise source-to-pay. GEP adds consulting and managed services; Ivalua is software only and stronger on direct materials.
IFS Applications: How do I manage the release cadence?
Budget for regular regression testing as a standing operational cost, automate the tests that cover your critical processes, and assign an owner for reviewing each release's changes. Organisations that treat each release as a surprise project struggle with this model.
Related pages
More on IFS Applications
Other head to heads
- GEP SMART vs Ivalua
- GEP SMART vs Levelpath
- GEP SMART vs Jaggaer
- GEP SMART vs Zycus
- GEP SMART vs Epicor
- GEP SMART vs Metasfresh
- GEP SMART vs QAD Adaptive ERP
- GEP SMART vs Cin7
- GEP SMART vs Visibility
- GEP SMART vs iDempiere
- GEP SMART vs OpenBravo
- GEP SMART vs ADempiere
- GEP SMART vs Cegid
- GEP SMART vs Comarch
- GEP SMART vs Dolibarr
- GEP SMART vs Dynamics AX
- GEP SMART vs Ecount
- GEP SMART vs Cin7 Core
- GEP SMART vs MRPeasy
- GEP SMART vs Infor CloudSuite
- GEP SMART vs DEAR Systems
- GEP SMART vs Fishbowl
- GEP SMART vs Sage X3
- GEP SMART vs SAP S/4HANA
- GEP SMART vs Axelor
- GEP SMART vs Plex Manufacturing Cloud
- GEP SMART vs Kingdee
- GEP SMART vs Omie
- GEP SMART vs Priority Software
- GEP SMART vs Protean ERP
- GEP SMART vs QAD ERP
- GEP SMART vs Infor
- IFS Applications vs Ivalua
- IFS Applications vs Levelpath
- IFS Applications vs Jaggaer
- IFS Applications vs Zycus
- IFS Applications vs Epicor
- IFS Applications vs Metasfresh
- IFS Applications vs QAD Adaptive ERP
- IFS Applications vs Cin7
- IFS Applications vs Visibility
- IFS Applications vs iDempiere
- IFS Applications vs OpenBravo
- IFS Applications vs ADempiere
- IFS Applications vs Cegid
- IFS Applications vs Comarch
- IFS Applications vs Dolibarr
- IFS Applications vs Dynamics AX
- IFS Applications vs Ecount
- IFS Applications vs Cin7 Core
- IFS Applications vs MRPeasy
- IFS Applications vs Infor CloudSuite
- IFS Applications vs DEAR Systems
- IFS Applications vs Fishbowl
- IFS Applications vs Sage X3
- IFS Applications vs SAP S/4HANA
- IFS Applications vs Axelor
- IFS Applications vs Plex Manufacturing Cloud
- IFS Applications vs Kingdee
- IFS Applications vs Omie
- IFS Applications vs Priority Software
- IFS Applications vs Protean ERP
- IFS Applications vs QAD ERP
- IFS Applications vs Infor
