Galileo vs Sourcegraph Cody

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Pricing, plan by plan

Which should you pick?

Questions people ask

Is Galileo or Sourcegraph Cody better?

Neither clearly leads. Galileo starts at Free and Sourcegraph Cody at $59/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.

Which is cheaper, Galileo or Sourcegraph Cody?

Galileo has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Galileo and $59/month for Sourcegraph Cody.

Does Galileo or Sourcegraph Cody run on more platforms?

Galileo runs on web, api. Sourcegraph Cody runs on web, windows, mac, linux.

Can I use Galileo for free?

Yes. Galileo has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sourcegraph Cody starts at $59/month.

What is Galileo best used for?

Galileo is most often used for evaluating rag and agent applications before production release, monitoring live genai applications for failures and drift, applying real-time guardrails without custom integration work, reducing evaluation costs using distilled luna judge models. Of those, evaluating rag and agent applications before production release and monitoring live genai applications for failures and drift are not what Sourcegraph Cody is typically brought in for.

What can Galileo do that Sourcegraph Cody cannot?

Galileo covers Pre-built evaluations, Ground truth capture, Luna models, Agent behavior analysis. Sourcegraph Cody covers Multi-repository context, Large context window, Context filters, Model flexibility.