Softwr

Insurance · head to head

FRISS vs Mimecast

FRISS logo

FRISS

Insurance

Trust automation for insurance

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Mimecast logo

Mimecast

Cybersecurity

Email and collaboration security

From
$4/month
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: FRISS no pricing plans, tiers, or costs are published on the website; Mimecast no pricing is published for any product or plan, and every route ends at a quote or demo request
  • They diverge on capability: FRISS covers Underwriting risk scoring, Mimecast covers Advanced threat detection.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which FRISS and Mimecast actually diverge.

Attributes where FRISS and Mimecast differ
AttributeFRISSMimecast
Starting priceOn request$4/month
PlatformsWeb, ApiEmail, Cloud, Collaboration
CategoryInsuranceCybersecurity
Founded20062003

Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in FRISS

  • Underwriting risk scoring
  • Claims fraud detection
  • Network analysis
  • Real-time decisioning
  • Third-party data enrichment
  • Case management
  • Predictive analytics
  • Compliance monitoring

Only in Mimecast

  • Advanced threat detection
  • Secure sharing
  • Email encryption
  • Message tracking
  • Email archiving
  • Legal hold
  • eDiscovery
  • Backup and recovery

Both cover

  • Cloud deployment

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

FRISS

  • Fraud detectionnot Mimecast
  • Risk assessmentnot Mimecast
  • Underwriting automationnot Mimecast
  • Claims investigationnot Mimecast
  • Compliancenot Mimecast

Mimecast

  • Email security filtering against phishing and targeted attacksnot FRISS
  • Email archiving, continuity and compliance for organisationsnot FRISS

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

FRISS

  • No pricing plans, tiers, or costs are published on the website
  • Requires direct contact through 'Let's talk' call-to-action for pricing inquiries

Mimecast

  • No pricing is published for any product or plan, and every route ends at a quote or demo request
  • The platform is split into separately sold products for email security, awareness training, data protection and governance
  • Collaboration threat protection, DMARC analysis, incident response and email archiving are all further add ons on top of those

Pricing, plan by plan

FRISS

On request
  • Underwriting$undefined/year
    • Risk scoring
    • Application fraud detection
    • Real-time assessment
  • Claims$undefined/year
    • Claims fraud detection
    • Network analysis
    • Investigation prioritization
  • Enterprise Platform$undefined/year
    • All modules
    • Custom models
    • Advanced analytics

Mimecast

$4/month
  • Defender$4/month
    • Per user
    • Threat protection
    • Impersonation prevention
  • Archive$3/month
    • Email archiving
    • Legal hold
    • Search & recall
  • Unified$6/month
    • All Defender features
    • All Archive features
    • Backup

Which should you pick?

Choose FRISS if

  • You need underwriting risk scoring.
  • You work on Web, Api.
  • You also want claims fraud detection.
FRISS review

Choose Mimecast if

  • You need advanced threat detection.
  • You work on Email, Cloud, Collaboration.
  • You also want secure sharing.
Mimecast review

Questions people ask

Is FRISS or Mimecast better?
Neither clearly leads. FRISS starts at On request and Mimecast at $4/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, FRISS or Mimecast?
FRISS starts at On request and Mimecast at $4/month.
Does FRISS or Mimecast run on more platforms?
FRISS runs on Web, Api. Mimecast runs on Email, Cloud, Collaboration.
What is FRISS best used for?
FRISS is most often used for fraud detection, risk assessment, underwriting automation, claims investigation. Of those, fraud detection and risk assessment are not what Mimecast is typically brought in for.
What can FRISS do that Mimecast cannot?
FRISS covers Underwriting risk scoring, Claims fraud detection, Network analysis, Real-time decisioning. Mimecast covers Advanced threat detection, Secure sharing, Email encryption, Message tracking. Both handle Cloud deployment.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

FRISS: How does FRISS publish pricing information?

FRISS does not publicly disclose pricing on their website. The company directs interested parties to contact their sales team directly for pricing and licensing details.

Source
Mimecast: How much does Mimecast cost?

Mimecast does not publish pricing on its website. Customers must request a custom quote by contacting the sales team at +1 617 393 7000 or using the Get a Quote button.

Source
FRISS: What pricing model does FRISS use?

FRISS does not specify their pricing model on publicly available pages, requiring direct contact with their sales team to discuss pricing structure and implementation costs.

Source
Mimecast: Is there a free trial of Mimecast?

Mimecast's trial and pricing options are not specified on the public website. Contact sales at +1 617 393 7000 or through their support portal at mimecastsupport.zendesk.com for trial availability.

Source
Share

Related pages

More on FRISS

More on Mimecast

Keep looking

Other head to heads