Logistics · head to head
Freightview vs Softeon
Freightview
Logistics
Freight shipping management to compare and book LTL and truckload rates
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Softeon
Logistics
Warehouse management and execution for complex distribution networks
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Freightview has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Freightview higher-volume pricing tiers (51+ shipments) require contacting sales for custom quotes; Softeon lower brand recognition than Manhattan, Blue Yonder or SAP, which is a genuine obstacle in enterprise procurement regardless of capability
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Freightview and Softeon actually diverge.
| Attribute | Freightview | Softeon |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | usage-based | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web, On-premise, Cloud |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logistics).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Freightview
Nothing recorded that Softeon does not also cover.
Only in Softeon
- Warehouse management
- Warehouse execution
- Distributed order management
- Configuration over customisation
- Automation integration
- Regulated distribution
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Freightview
- Managing LTL shipments with dynamic pricing optionsnot Softeon
- Integrating parcel tracking into existing logistics systemsnot Softeon
- Comparing freight quotes across multiple carriers monthlynot Softeon
- Coordinating parcel shipments for growing ecommerce businessesnot Softeon
Softeon
- Distribution networks where a failed WMS go-live has physical consequencesnot Freightview
- Regulated food and pharmaceutical distribution needing lot and expiry controlnot Freightview
- Operations integrating warehouse automation with execution softwarenot Freightview
- Companies replacing a heavily customised legacy WMS they can no longer upgradenot Freightview
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Freightview
- Higher-volume pricing tiers (51+ shipments) require contacting sales for custom quotes
Softeon
- Lower brand recognition than Manhattan, Blue Yonder or SAP, which is a genuine obstacle in enterprise procurement regardless of capability
- Pricing and implementation cost are entirely quote-based with no public reference points
- The buyer profile is narrow: it is aimed at complex distribution, and simpler operations will pay for depth they never use
- Smaller partner ecosystem than the market leaders, so implementation resources are more concentrated
- Public documentation is thin compared with vendors that publish extensively, making pre-sales research harder
Pricing, plan by plan
Freightview
Free- 0-50 shipments$149/month
- Up to 50 shipments per month
- 51-500 shipments$null/mo
- Custom pricing for 51-500 shipments per month
- 501-1000 shipments$null/mo
- Custom pricing for 501-1000 shipments per month
- 1001+ shipments$null/mo
- Custom pricing for 1001+ shipments per month
Softeon
On request- Softeon WMS$undefined/year
- Warehouse management
- Warehouse execution
- Distributed order management
Which should you pick?
Choose Softeon if
- You need warehouse management.
- You work on Web, On-premise, Cloud.
- You also want warehouse execution.
Questions people ask
- Is Freightview or Softeon better?
- Neither clearly leads. Freightview starts at Free and Softeon at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Freightview or Softeon?
- Freightview has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Freightview and On request for Softeon.
- Does Freightview or Softeon run on more platforms?
- Freightview runs on Web. Softeon runs on Web, On-premise, Cloud.
- Can I use Freightview for free?
- Yes. Freightview has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Softeon starts at On request.
- What is Freightview best used for?
- Freightview is most often used for managing ltl shipments with dynamic pricing options, integrating parcel tracking into existing logistics systems, comparing freight quotes across multiple carriers monthly, coordinating parcel shipments for growing ecommerce businesses. Of those, managing ltl shipments with dynamic pricing options and integrating parcel tracking into existing logistics systems are not what Softeon is typically brought in for.
- What can Freightview do that Softeon cannot?
- Softeon covers Warehouse management, Warehouse execution, Distributed order management, Configuration over customisation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Freightview: What is Freightview's entry-level pricing?
The entry-level plan is $149 per month for up to 50 shipments, with higher volumes requiring custom pricing quotes.
SourceSofteon: What makes Softeon different from other WMS vendors?
Its claim is delivery reliability rather than feature superiority, backed by a published record of implementations going live on time. In a market where WMS overruns are normal, that is the pitch.
Freightview: Does Freightview offer a free trial?
Yes, Freightview offers a 14-day free trial with no upfront payment required. As stated: 'You get 14 days to try Freightview... if you don't put in your payment information, we don't charge you.'
SourceSofteon: Configuration or customisation?
Configuration-driven by design. That is worth verifying in detail, because customised warehouse systems are the ones that become impossible to upgrade or replace later.
Freightview: How does Freightview handle high-volume shipments?
For businesses shipping 51 or more shipments per month, Freightview offers custom pricing. Customers can request annual prepayment options after consultation with sales.
SourceSofteon: What does it cost?
Not published. Enterprise annual licensing plus implementation, quoted on scope.
Softeon: Does it handle warehouse automation?
Yes, warehouse execution and automation integration are core rather than bolted on, which is the main reason it appears on shortlists with automation vendors.
Softeon: Is it right for a single small warehouse?
No. The capability is aimed at complex, high-volume distribution, and a single simple site will not repay the implementation.
Related pages
More on Freightview
Other head to heads
- Freightview vs Loadsmart
- Freightview vs AfterShip
- Freightview vs Cargoson
- Freightview vs CWILL Post-Purchase
- Freightview vs Deliverr
- Freightview vs Alpega
- Freightview vs Kuebix
- Freightview vs Shipwell
- Freightview vs Descartes MacroPoint
- Freightview vs Shippo
- Freightview vs Easyship
- Freightview vs ShipEngine
- Freightview vs ShipMonk
- Freightview vs Shippabo
- Freightview vs SpireStock
- Freightview vs Deposco
- Freightview vs Logiwa
- Freightview vs Blue Yonder
- Freightview vs Manhattan Associates
- Freightview vs CargoWise
- Freightview vs Descartes Systems
- Freightview vs Turvo
- Freightview vs Onfleet
- Freightview vs Trimble TMW.Suite
- Softeon vs Loadsmart
- Softeon vs AfterShip
- Softeon vs Cargoson
- Softeon vs CWILL Post-Purchase
- Softeon vs Deliverr
- Softeon vs Alpega
- Softeon vs Kuebix
- Softeon vs Shipwell
- Softeon vs Descartes MacroPoint
- Softeon vs Shippo
- Softeon vs Easyship
- Softeon vs ShipEngine
- Softeon vs ShipMonk
- Softeon vs Shippabo
- Softeon vs SpireStock
- Softeon vs Deposco
- Softeon vs Logiwa
- Softeon vs Blue Yonder
- Softeon vs Manhattan Associates
- Softeon vs CargoWise
- Softeon vs Descartes Systems
- Softeon vs Turvo
- Softeon vs Onfleet
- Softeon vs Trimble TMW.Suite
