Developer Tools · head to head
Frappe vs Trino

Frappe
Developer Tools
The Python web framework behind ERPNext, sold as managed hosting through Frappe Cloud
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Trino
Technology
A distributed SQL engine that queries data where it already lives, across object storage, warehouses and operational databases.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Frappe the framework is strongly opinionated: its own ORM, templating and job queue mean general Python and Django experience transfers only partly, and onboarding a new developer takes weeks rather than days.; Trino trino stores nothing and computes no statistics of its own, so the plan it produces is only as good as the partitioning, file sizes and table statistics on the source; a Hive table of thousands of small files or a lake with no stats produces a slow query the engine cannot improve.
- They diverge on capability: Frappe covers DocType modelling, Trino covers Federated querying.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Frappe and Trino actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Frappe
- DocType modelling
- Role and field permissions
- Built-in REST API
- Background jobs
- Bench CLI
- Frappe Cloud hosting
- App marketplace
- Multi-tenancy
Only in Trino
- Federated querying
- Connector architecture
- Predicate and aggregation pushdown
- Massively parallel execution
- Fault-tolerant execution
- Resource groups
- Iceberg and Delta table support
- Standard client protocols
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Frappe
- A team building an internal business application that needs permissions, audit trail and an API on day one rather than in month threenot Trino
- An ERPNext user who wants managed hosting, automatic updates and offsite backups without hiring a systems administratornot Trino
- An Indian or emerging-market business that wants to pay for application hosting in local currency at local price pointsnot Trino
- A consultancy shipping custom vertical apps to clients on a shared framework with per-client site isolationnot Trino
Trino
- Ad hoc analysis that spans a data lake and one or more operational databases, without building an ingestion pipeline firstnot Frappe
- Serving a BI tool a single SQL endpoint over an estate that is actually several separate storage systemsnot Frappe
- Querying Iceberg or Delta tables on object storage interactively, as the compute layer of a lakehousenot Frappe
- Investigating whether a dataset is worth ingesting, by querying it in place before committing to a pipeline for itnot Frappe
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Frappe
- The framework is strongly opinionated: its own ORM, templating and job queue mean general Python and Django experience transfers only partly, and onboarding a new developer takes weeks rather than days.
- The developer pool is small and heavily concentrated in India, so hiring Frappe experience elsewhere is slow and expensive relative to mainstream stacks.
- Documentation is uneven in depth and lags behind releases in places, so real answers often come from reading the source or the community forum.
- Major version upgrades of the framework have historically broken custom apps that reach past the DocType layer, so bespoke code carries a recurring maintenance cost at each upgrade.
- Frappe Cloud recommends against its cheapest Hetzner-backed option for mission-critical production, so the headline $5 entry price is not the price of a production-grade deployment.
Trino
- Trino stores nothing and computes no statistics of its own, so the plan it produces is only as good as the partitioning, file sizes and table statistics on the source; a Hive table of thousands of small files or a lake with no stats produces a slow query the engine cannot improve.
- Federated queries pull data out of the systems they touch, so a join between a lake table and a production Postgres can put a full table scan onto an OLTP database that other applications depend on, and the person who wrote the query will not see the incident it causes.
- Releases come roughly every one to two weeks with no community long-term support line, and deprecations arrive quickly, so you either dedicate someone to keeping current or you buy Starburst Enterprise for a supported long-term version.
- It is memory-based and disk spilling was deprecated in favour of fault-tolerant execution, so a query exceeding cluster memory fails outright rather than degrading; enabling fault-tolerant execution requires an external exchange store on object storage and makes queries measurably slower.
- It is a query engine and not a warehouse: there is no built-in job scheduling, no incremental materialised view maintenance and no transformation framework, so producing curated tables still needs dbt or an equivalent layer that somebody has to own.
- The 2020 fork split the ecosystem, so documentation, connectors, Stack Overflow answers and vendor material written before then describe PrestoDB, which is now a different project with different behaviour, and following the wrong one wastes real time.
Pricing, plan by plan
Frappe
Free- Framework, self-hostedFree
- MIT licensed, no licence fee
- Install with bench on your own Linux servers
- You carry updates, backups and security patching
- Frappe Cloud Sites$5/month
- Also listed at ₹410 per month
- Shared servers with 150+ installable apps
- Automatic updates and offsite backups
- Frappe Cloud Servers$40/month
- Also listed at ₹3,600 per month
- Dedicated or shared virtual machines
- Unlimited sites on your server
Trino
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Trino review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Frappe if
- You need doctype modelling.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Docker.
- You also want role and field permissions.
Choose Trino if
- You need federated querying.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want connector architecture.
Questions people ask
- Is Frappe or Trino better?
- Neither clearly leads. Frappe starts at Free and Trino at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Frappe or Trino?
- Frappe starts at Free and Trino at Free.
- Does Frappe or Trino run on more platforms?
- Frappe runs on Web, Linux, Docker. Trino runs on Web.
- Can I use Frappe for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Frappe best used for?
- Frappe is most often used for a team building an internal business application that needs permissions, audit trail and an api on day one rather than in month three, an erpnext user who wants managed hosting, automatic updates and offsite backups without hiring a systems administrator, an indian or emerging-market business that wants to pay for application hosting in local currency at local price points, a consultancy shipping custom vertical apps to clients on a shared framework with per-client site isolation. Of those, a team building an internal business application that needs permissions, audit trail and an api on day one rather than in month three and an erpnext user who wants managed hosting, automatic updates and offsite backups without hiring a systems administrator are not what Trino is typically brought in for.
- What can Frappe do that Trino cannot?
- Frappe covers DocType modelling, Role and field permissions, Built-in REST API, Background jobs. Trino covers Federated querying, Connector architecture, Predicate and aggregation pushdown, Massively parallel execution.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Frappe: Is Frappe the same as ERPNext?
No. Frappe is the framework; ERPNext is the ERP application written on it. You can run Frappe without ERPNext to build your own applications.
Trino: What is the difference between Trino and Presto?
They share an origin. The original creators left Meta and renamed their fork from PrestoSQL to Trino in December 2020; PrestoDB continues separately under the Linux Foundation. They have diverged in features, connectors and SQL behaviour, so material written for one may not apply to the other.
Frappe: What licence is the framework under?
MIT, which is permissive and imposes no obligation to publish your changes, unlike the AGPL used by several open source ERP rivals.
Trino: Does Trino replace my data warehouse?
Not on its own. It is compute without storage, scheduling or transformation. Paired with Iceberg or Delta on object storage and something like dbt for modelling it can serve as a lakehouse; used alone it is a query layer over what you already have.
Frappe: Can I pay in rupees?
Yes. Frappe Cloud publishes the same plans in Indian rupees, ₹410 a month for sites and ₹3,600 for servers, rather than converting a dollar price at checkout.
Trino: Why is my federated query slow?
Usually because a connector could not push a filter or aggregation down, so Trino is pulling whole tables across the network to join them itself. The fix is usually better source-side partitioning or statistics, or ingesting that source rather than federating it.
Frappe: Do I have to use Frappe Cloud?
No, self-hosting with bench or Docker is fully supported and free. Frappe Cloud is a convenience purchase, and it funds the open source work.
Trino: What happens when a query runs out of memory?
It fails. Disk spilling was deprecated in favour of fault-tolerant execution, which checkpoints to an external exchange store such as S3 and lets long queries survive memory pressure and worker loss, at the cost of noticeably slower execution.
Trino: Is there commercial support?
Yes, from Starburst, which offers Starburst Enterprise with long-term supported releases and Starburst Galaxy as a managed service. The open source project itself has no long-term support line.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Frappe vs Pants Build
- Frappe vs Helix
- Frappe vs Jitsu
- Frappe vs Steampipe
- Frappe vs Tilt
- Frappe vs Backstage
- Frappe vs Xlinesoft
- Frappe vs Visual Studio Code
- Frappe vs Penpot
- Frappe vs GNU Emacs
- Frappe vs Bazel
- Frappe vs Eclipse IDE
- Frappe vs Keil MDK
- Frappe vs Vite
- Frappe vs Daytona
- Frappe vs Depot
- Frappe vs Asana
- Frappe vs ClickUp
- Frappe vs Figma
- Frappe vs Linear
- Frappe vs Thought Machine
- Frappe vs Apache Hadoop
- Frappe vs Safari
- Frappe vs Apache Spark
- Frappe vs etcd
- Frappe vs Honeycomb
- Frappe vs Istio
- Frappe vs Postgres
- Frappe vs Netlify
- Frappe vs Productboard
- Frappe vs Sentry
- Frappe vs Aha!
- Frappe vs Attio
- Frappe vs Canny
- Trino vs Pants Build
- Trino vs Helix
- Trino vs Jitsu
- Trino vs Steampipe
- Trino vs Tilt
- Trino vs Backstage
- Trino vs Xlinesoft
- Trino vs Visual Studio Code
- Trino vs Penpot
- Trino vs GNU Emacs
- Trino vs Bazel
- Trino vs Eclipse IDE
- Trino vs Keil MDK
- Trino vs Vite
- Trino vs Daytona
- Trino vs Depot
- Trino vs Asana
- Trino vs ClickUp
- Trino vs Figma
- Trino vs Linear
- Trino vs Thought Machine
- Trino vs Apache Hadoop
- Trino vs Safari
- Trino vs Apache Spark
- Trino vs etcd
- Trino vs Honeycomb
- Trino vs Istio
- Trino vs Postgres
- Trino vs Netlify
- Trino vs Productboard
- Trino vs Sentry
- Trino vs Aha!
- Trino vs Attio
- Trino vs Canny
