Developer Tools · head to head
Frappe vs IBM QRadar

Frappe
Developer Tools
The Python web framework behind ERPNext, sold as managed hosting through Frappe Cloud
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Frappe has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Frappe the framework is strongly opinionated: its own ORM, templating and job queue mean general Python and Django experience transfers only partly, and onboarding a new developer takes weeks rather than days.; IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- They diverge on capability: Frappe covers DocType modelling, IBM QRadar covers Offence model.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Frappe and IBM QRadar actually diverge.
| Attribute | Frappe | IBM QRadar |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Per month by site or server | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, Docker | Web, Api |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | Unknown | 1911 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Frappe
- DocType modelling
- Role and field permissions
- Built-in REST API
- Background jobs
- Bench CLI
- Frappe Cloud hosting
- App marketplace
- Multi-tenancy
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Frappe
- A team building an internal business application that needs permissions, audit trail and an API on day one rather than in month threenot IBM QRadar
- An ERPNext user who wants managed hosting, automatic updates and offsite backups without hiring a systems administratornot IBM QRadar
- An Indian or emerging-market business that wants to pay for application hosting in local currency at local price pointsnot IBM QRadar
- A consultancy shipping custom vertical apps to clients on a shared framework with per-client site isolationnot IBM QRadar
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot Frappe
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot Frappe
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot Frappe
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot Frappe
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Frappe
- The framework is strongly opinionated: its own ORM, templating and job queue mean general Python and Django experience transfers only partly, and onboarding a new developer takes weeks rather than days.
- The developer pool is small and heavily concentrated in India, so hiring Frappe experience elsewhere is slow and expensive relative to mainstream stacks.
- Documentation is uneven in depth and lags behind releases in places, so real answers often come from reading the source or the community forum.
- Major version upgrades of the framework have historically broken custom apps that reach past the DocType layer, so bespoke code carries a recurring maintenance cost at each upgrade.
- Frappe Cloud recommends against its cheapest Hetzner-backed option for mission-critical production, so the headline $5 entry price is not the price of a production-grade deployment.
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
Pricing, plan by plan
Frappe
Free- Framework, self-hostedFree
- MIT licensed, no licence fee
- Install with bench on your own Linux servers
- You carry updates, backups and security patching
- Frappe Cloud Sites$5/month
- Also listed at ₹410 per month
- Shared servers with 150+ installable apps
- Automatic updates and offsite backups
- Frappe Cloud Servers$40/month
- Also listed at ₹3,600 per month
- Dedicated or shared virtual machines
- Unlimited sites on your server
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
Which should you pick?
Choose Frappe if
- You need doctype modelling.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Docker.
- You also want role and field permissions.
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Questions people ask
- Is Frappe or IBM QRadar better?
- Neither clearly leads. Frappe starts at Free and IBM QRadar at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Frappe or IBM QRadar?
- Frappe has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Frappe and On request for IBM QRadar.
- Does Frappe or IBM QRadar run on more platforms?
- Frappe runs on Web, Linux, Docker. IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Frappe for free?
- Yes. Frappe has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. IBM QRadar starts at On request.
- What is Frappe best used for?
- Frappe is most often used for a team building an internal business application that needs permissions, audit trail and an api on day one rather than in month three, an erpnext user who wants managed hosting, automatic updates and offsite backups without hiring a systems administrator, an indian or emerging-market business that wants to pay for application hosting in local currency at local price points, a consultancy shipping custom vertical apps to clients on a shared framework with per-client site isolation. Of those, a team building an internal business application that needs permissions, audit trail and an api on day one rather than in month three and an erpnext user who wants managed hosting, automatic updates and offsite backups without hiring a systems administrator are not what IBM QRadar is typically brought in for.
- What can Frappe do that IBM QRadar cannot?
- Frappe covers DocType modelling, Role and field permissions, Built-in REST API, Background jobs. IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Frappe: Is Frappe the same as ERPNext?
No. Frappe is the framework; ERPNext is the ERP application written on it. You can run Frappe without ERPNext to build your own applications.
IBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
Frappe: What licence is the framework under?
MIT, which is permissive and imposes no obligation to publish your changes, unlike the AGPL used by several open source ERP rivals.
IBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
Frappe: Can I pay in rupees?
Yes. Frappe Cloud publishes the same plans in Indian rupees, ₹410 a month for sites and ₹3,600 for servers, rather than converting a dollar price at checkout.
IBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
Frappe: Do I have to use Frappe Cloud?
No, self-hosting with bench or Docker is fully supported and free. Frappe Cloud is a convenience purchase, and it funds the open source work.
IBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
IBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Frappe vs Pants Build
- Frappe vs Helix
- Frappe vs Jitsu
- Frappe vs Steampipe
- Frappe vs Tilt
- Frappe vs Backstage
- Frappe vs Xlinesoft
- Frappe vs Visual Studio Code
- Frappe vs Penpot
- Frappe vs GNU Emacs
- Frappe vs Bazel
- Frappe vs Eclipse IDE
- Frappe vs Keil MDK
- Frappe vs Vite
- Frappe vs Daytona
- Frappe vs Depot
- Frappe vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Frappe vs 1Password
- Frappe vs Norton 360
- Frappe vs LastPass
- Frappe vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Frappe vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Frappe vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Frappe vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Frappe vs Recorded Future
- Frappe vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Frappe vs Proofpoint
- Frappe vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Frappe vs Arnica
- Frappe vs Authelia
- Frappe vs Authy
- Frappe vs Baffle
- Frappe vs Beyond Identity
- Frappe vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs Pants Build
- IBM QRadar vs Helix
- IBM QRadar vs Jitsu
- IBM QRadar vs Steampipe
- IBM QRadar vs Tilt
- IBM QRadar vs Backstage
- IBM QRadar vs Xlinesoft
- IBM QRadar vs Visual Studio Code
- IBM QRadar vs Penpot
- IBM QRadar vs GNU Emacs
- IBM QRadar vs Bazel
- IBM QRadar vs Eclipse IDE
- IBM QRadar vs Keil MDK
- IBM QRadar vs Vite
- IBM QRadar vs Daytona
- IBM QRadar vs Depot
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust
