Softwr

Automation Integration · head to head

Flowable vs SnapLogic

Flowable logo

Flowable

Automation Integration

Apache 2.0 BPMN, CMMN and DMN engine from the team that originally built Activiti

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
SnapLogic logo

SnapLogic

Automation Integration

The #1 integration platform for enterprise

From
$2000/month
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only Flowable has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Flowable the open source engine is genuinely usable but ships without the modelling studio, work application and admin console, so an open source deployment means building your own user interfaces before anyone can use it.; SnapLogic no dollar amount is published for any of the three packages despite the page describing them as transparent
  • They diverge on capability: Flowable covers BPMN 2.0 engine, SnapLogic covers Low-code integration.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Flowable and SnapLogic actually diverge.

Attributes where Flowable and SnapLogic differ
AttributeFlowableSnapLogic
Starting priceFree$2000/month
Pricing modelquotesubscription
Free tierYesNo
PlatformsLinux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, CloudWeb, On-premise
FoundedUnknown2006

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Flowable

  • BPMN 2.0 engine
  • CMMN case management
  • DMN decision tables
  • Spring Boot integration
  • Modelling studio
  • Task and case application
  • REST APIs
  • History and audit

Only in SnapLogic

  • Low-code integration
  • API management
  • Data integration
  • Real-time sync
  • Error handling
  • Monitoring
  • Analytics
  • 500+ connectors

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Flowable

  • An insurer automating claims handling where each case follows a different path and BPMN alone cannot express itnot SnapLogic
  • A bank embedding process orchestration inside an existing Spring Boot estate rather than buying a separate platformnot SnapLogic
  • A team leaving Activiti or jBPM that wants the same API family with active commercial maintenancenot SnapLogic
  • A regulated organisation needing complete process history and decision table audit trails for supervisorsnot SnapLogic

SnapLogic

  • Enterprise integration and data movementnot Flowable
  • API managementnot Flowable

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Flowable

  • The open source engine is genuinely usable but ships without the modelling studio, work application and admin console, so an open source deployment means building your own user interfaces before anyone can use it.
  • It expects Java engineering capacity; teams looking for a business-user low-code automation tool will find the modelling and deployment cycle far too technical.
  • Enterprise pricing is not published and is quoted per deployment, leaving buyers without a benchmark against Camunda or IBM alternatives.
  • The Activiti fork left three engines with related APIs and overlapping documentation in circulation, and search results routinely return advice for the wrong one.
  • Flowable AG is a small Swiss company relative to its competitors, so the partner network, training market and pool of engineers with production experience are all limited outside Europe.

SnapLogic

  • No dollar amount is published for any of the three packages despite the page describing them as transparent
  • Cost is driven by how many data and application endpoints are connected, so the bill grows with integration count rather than volume
  • Premium Snap Packs are sold separately from the core packages
  • Every route to a figure runs through a demo booking

Pricing, plan by plan

Flowable

Free
  • Flowable Open SourceFree
    • Apache 2.0 licensed BPMN, CMMN and DMN engines
    • Embeddable Java library or standalone apps
    • No modelling studio or enterprise applications
  • Flowable Enterprise$undefined/year
    • Modelling studio, work application and admin console
    • Connectors, forms and advanced identity management
    • Support with SLA and version maintenance

SnapLogic

$2000/month
  • Starter$2000/month
    • Basic integration
  • Professional$5000/month
    • Advanced integration
    • Priority support
  • Enterprise$15000/month
    • Custom solutions
    • Dedicated support

Which should you pick?

Choose Flowable if

  • You need bpmn 2.0 engine.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
  • You also want cmmn case management.
Flowable review

Choose SnapLogic if

  • You need low-code integration.
  • You work on Web, On-premise.
  • You also want api management.
SnapLogic review

Questions people ask

Is Flowable or SnapLogic better?
Neither clearly leads. Flowable starts at Free and SnapLogic at $2000/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Flowable or SnapLogic?
Flowable has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Flowable and $2000/month for SnapLogic.
Does Flowable or SnapLogic run on more platforms?
Flowable runs on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud. SnapLogic runs on Web, On-premise.
Can I use Flowable for free?
Yes. Flowable has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. SnapLogic starts at $2000/month.
What is Flowable best used for?
Flowable is most often used for an insurer automating claims handling where each case follows a different path and bpmn alone cannot express it, a bank embedding process orchestration inside an existing spring boot estate rather than buying a separate platform, a team leaving activiti or jbpm that wants the same api family with active commercial maintenance, a regulated organisation needing complete process history and decision table audit trails for supervisors. Of those, an insurer automating claims handling where each case follows a different path and bpmn alone cannot express it and a bank embedding process orchestration inside an existing spring boot estate rather than buying a separate platform are not what SnapLogic is typically brought in for.
What can Flowable do that SnapLogic cannot?
Flowable covers BPMN 2.0 engine, CMMN case management, DMN decision tables, Spring Boot integration. SnapLogic covers Low-code integration, API management, Data integration, Real-time sync.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Flowable: Is Flowable open source?

Yes, the BPMN, CMMN and DMN engines are Apache 2.0. The modelling studio and enterprise applications are commercial.

SnapLogic: How much does SnapLogic cost?

SnapLogic uses package-based pricing with three tiers: Essential, Professional, and Enterprise One. Specific pricing is not publicly displayed. The vendor emphasizes unlimited pipelines, data movement, and integrations at the same predictable price for each tier, with no hidden fees. Contact SnapLogic directly for custom quotes.

Source
Flowable: How does it relate to Activiti and jBPM?

The same core developers built jBPM, then Activiti, then forked Activiti in 2016 to create Flowable.

SnapLogic: What add-on services does SnapLogic offer?

SnapLogic offers add-on services including AgentCreator for AI agent building, API Management, AI Gateway, Ultra Low-Latency Workflows, AutoSync, ELT, High-Performance Nodes, and Advanced Security, in addition to base package tiers.

Source
Flowable: What does Flowable Enterprise cost?

Nothing is published. It is quoted per deployment by the vendor.

Flowable: Why choose it over Camunda?

CMMN case management is a first-class engine, which matters when work is exception-driven rather than a fixed sequence.

Share

Related pages

More on Flowable

More on SnapLogic

Keep looking

Other head to heads