Softwr

Accounting · head to head

FloQast vs Fluxx

FloQast logo

FloQast

Accounting

Close management software for accounting teams

From
$29/month
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Fluxx logo

Fluxx

Nonprofits

Configurable grants management for foundations that run complex, multi-stage funding programmes

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: FloQast no pricing is published, and the vendor states packages scale with business outcomes rather than seat count, which gives a buyer no unit to estimate against; Fluxx configuration flexibility means the system does very little until someone configures it, and foundations without a dedicated systems administrator end up paying the vendor or a partner for every change.
  • They diverge on capability: FloQast covers Close management, Fluxx covers Configurable data model.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which FloQast and Fluxx actually diverge.

Attributes where FloQast and Fluxx differ
AttributeFloQastFluxx
Starting price$29/monthOn request
Pricing modelsubscriptionquote
CategoryAccountingNonprofits
Founded2013Unknown

Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in FloQast

  • Close management
  • Reconciliation
  • Flux analysis
  • Audit prep
  • Team collaboration
  • NetSuite
  • QuickBooks
  • Sage

Only in Fluxx

  • Configurable data model
  • Card-based interface
  • Multi-programme workflows
  • Board and committee review
  • Payment scheduling
  • Applicant portal

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

FloQast

  • Managing the accounting close with checklists and reconciliationsnot Fluxx
  • Automating account reconciliation and compliance workflowsnot Fluxx

Fluxx

  • A foundation running six distinct funding programmes that each need their own application form, review panel and payment schedulenot FloQast
  • A regranting intermediary administering funds for multiple donors who each require separate reportingnot FloQast
  • A public agency distributing grant funds with statutory eligibility rules that must be enforced before an application can be submittednot FloQast
  • A funder moving off spreadsheets and email after grant volume made manual board packet preparation unworkablenot FloQast

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

FloQast

  • No pricing is published, and the vendor states packages scale with business outcomes rather than seat count, which gives a buyer no unit to estimate against
  • The product is split into five separately packaged solution categories
  • Every route to a figure runs through a personalised demo

Fluxx

  • Configuration flexibility means the system does very little until someone configures it, and foundations without a dedicated systems administrator end up paying the vendor or a partner for every change.
  • Implementation commonly runs four to eight months and is priced separately from the subscription, so first-year cost is far above the annual licence figure.
  • No pricing is published and quotes scale with assets under management, which means two foundations making the same number of grants can be quoted very differently.
  • The card-based interface is unfamiliar to new users and reviewer adoption suffers without training, which matters because trustees use it a few times a year and forget between meetings.
  • Reporting is capable but the report builder is technical, and many foundations end up exporting to a spreadsheet or a BI tool for board-ready output.

Pricing, plan by plan

FloQast

$29/month
  • StandardFree
    • Custom pricing
    • Close management
    • Reconciliation

Fluxx

On request
  • Fluxx Grantmaker$undefined/year
    • Configurable grantmaking workflows
    • Applicant portal and reviewer access
    • Priced by assets under management and grant volume
  • Fluxx Grantseeker$undefined/year
    • Free portal for applicants submitting to Fluxx funders
    • Tracks submissions and requirements across funders

Which should you pick?

Choose FloQast if

  • You need close management.
  • You also want reconciliation.
FloQast review

Choose Fluxx if

  • You need configurable data model.
  • You also want card-based interface.
Fluxx review

Questions people ask

Is FloQast or Fluxx better?
Neither clearly leads. FloQast starts at $29/month and Fluxx at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, FloQast or Fluxx?
FloQast starts at $29/month and Fluxx at On request.
Does FloQast or Fluxx run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is FloQast best used for?
FloQast is most often used for managing the accounting close with checklists and reconciliations, automating account reconciliation and compliance workflows. Of those, managing the accounting close with checklists and reconciliations and automating account reconciliation and compliance workflows are not what Fluxx is typically brought in for.
What can FloQast do that Fluxx cannot?
FloQast covers Close management, Reconciliation, Flux analysis, Audit prep. Fluxx covers Configurable data model, Card-based interface, Multi-programme workflows, Board and committee review.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

FloQast: How much does FloQast cost?

FloQast does not publish specific pricing with dollar amounts. Instead, the company offers customized packages that scale with business outcomes rather than seat count. Pricing is tailored to each organization's unique needs, scope, and scale.

Source
Fluxx: Is Fluxx Grantseeker really free?

Yes, for applicants. It is the submission portal, and funders pay for Grantmaker.

FloQast: Does FloQast charge per user?

No. FloQast explicitly states 'No Per-User Fees. Pricing Built Around Value, Not Headcount.' The company's pricing is customized to organizational requirements rather than based on the number of users.

Source
Fluxx: How is Fluxx priced?

By quote, scaling with assets under management and grant volume. Implementation is a separate professional services fee.

FloQast: What is FloQast's pricing model?

FloQast uses a value-based pricing approach with customizable packages across solutions like Close Management, Compliance & Risk, Financial Reporting, and AI Automation. Each organization receives a personalized pricing recommendation based on their unique challenges and objectives.

Source
Fluxx: Can we configure Fluxx ourselves?

Yes, that is the point of it. But it requires a trained internal administrator; foundations that do not appoint one become dependent on paid services.

Fluxx: How long does implementation take?

Typically four to eight months for a multi-programme funder, driven mostly by how long the foundation takes to agree its own process.

Share

Related pages

More on FloQast

More on Fluxx

Keep looking

Other head to heads