Softwr

Software · head to head

FLAC3D vs UDEC

F

FLAC3D

Software

3D finite difference software for geotechnical engineering

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
U

UDEC

Software

Universal distinct element code for mining analysis

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: FLAC3D the FLAC3D product page publishes no price and routes buyers to a quote request or an external software store; UDEC the UDEC product page publishes no price and directs buyers to a quote request or an external software store
  • They diverge on capability: FLAC3D covers 3D finite difference modeling, UDEC covers Distinct element modeling.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which FLAC3D and UDEC actually diverge.

Attributes where FLAC3D and UDEC differ
AttributeFLAC3DUDEC

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), platforms (Windows, Linux), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown), founded (1981).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in FLAC3D

  • 3D finite difference modeling
  • Stress-strain analysis
  • Coupled flow analysis
  • Mining-specific features
  • GeoStudio
  • Python scripting

Only in UDEC

  • Distinct element modeling
  • Joint network modeling
  • Block interaction analysis
  • Support interaction
  • FLAC3D
  • 3DEC

Both cover

  • Dynamic analysis
  • AutoCAD
  • Leapfrog
  • Windows support
  • Linux support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

FLAC3D

  • Three dimensional continuum modelling of soil and rock behaviournot UDEC
  • Analysing underground excavation and mine stability including cavingnot UDEC
  • Coupled thermal, dynamic and creep analysis of geotechnical structuresnot UDEC

UDEC

  • Two dimensional distinct element modelling of jointed and fractured rocknot FLAC3D
  • Assessing stability of blocky rock slopes and underground excavationsnot FLAC3D
  • Simulating fluid flow through rock fractures in mining and tunnellingnot FLAC3D

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

FLAC3D

  • The FLAC3D product page publishes no price and routes buyers to a quote request or an external software store
  • Advanced capabilities including Dynamics, Thermal, Creep and IMASS are optional modules sold separately from the base licence
  • Licence portability depends on a physical USB key or a web licence managed centrally, rather than a simple sign in
  • One licence permits only two simultaneous instances on the same computer

UDEC

  • The UDEC product page publishes no price and directs buyers to a quote request or an external software store
  • Fluid Flow, Barton-Bandis joint analysis, Creep, Thermal and User Defined Models are optional add ons charged on top of the base licence
  • Writing custom constitutive models requires the separately licensed UDM option and C++ programming
  • Purchases through the Buy Now route are prepaid annual subscriptions rather than a permanent licence

Pricing, plan by plan

FLAC3D

On request
  • FLAC3D Professional$22000/year
    • 3D finite difference analysis
    • Slope stability
    • Mine design

UDEC

On request
  • UDEC Professional$19000/year
    • Distinct element analysis
    • Joint modeling
    • Block interaction

Which should you pick?

Choose FLAC3D if

  • You need 3d finite difference modeling.
  • You work on Windows, Linux.
  • You also want stress-strain analysis.
FLAC3D review

Choose UDEC if

  • You need distinct element modeling.
  • You work on Windows, Linux.
  • You also want joint network modeling.
UDEC review

Questions people ask

Is FLAC3D or UDEC better?
Neither clearly leads. FLAC3D starts at On request and UDEC at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, FLAC3D or UDEC?
FLAC3D starts at On request and UDEC at On request.
Does FLAC3D or UDEC run on more platforms?
Both run on Windows, Linux, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is FLAC3D best used for?
FLAC3D is most often used for three dimensional continuum modelling of soil and rock behaviour, analysing underground excavation and mine stability including caving, coupled thermal, dynamic and creep analysis of geotechnical structures. Of those, three dimensional continuum modelling of soil and rock behaviour and analysing underground excavation and mine stability including caving are not what UDEC is typically brought in for.
What can FLAC3D do that UDEC cannot?
FLAC3D covers 3D finite difference modeling, Stress-strain analysis, Coupled flow analysis, Mining-specific features. UDEC covers Distinct element modeling, Joint network modeling, Block interaction analysis, Support interaction. Both handle Dynamic analysis, AutoCAD, Leapfrog, Windows support.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on FLAC3D

More on UDEC

Keep looking

Other head to heads