Databases · head to head
Firestore vs Keycloak

Firestore
Databases
Flexible, scalable NoSQL cloud database from Firebase
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Keycloak is an open-source IAM platform supporting OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.
- Both are free.
- Where Firestore falls short: the no-cost Spark plan caps Standard edition at 50,000 document reads, 20,000 writes and 20,000 deletes per day.
- Where Keycloak falls short: requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Firestore and Keycloak actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
Not yet recorded: founded for Keycloak.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Firestore
- Document Model
- Real-time Updates
- Offline Support
- ACID Transactions
- Expressive Queries
- Multi-region
- Security Rules
- Firebase Auth
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that Firestore does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Firestore
- Storing structured application data with realtime listenersnot Keycloak
- Backing mobile and web apps with a serverless document databasenot Keycloak
- Building offline first apps that sync when connectivity returnsnot Keycloak
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Firestore
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Firestore
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Firestore
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Firestore
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Firestore
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Firestore
- The no-cost Spark plan caps Standard edition at 50,000 document reads, 20,000 writes and 20,000 deletes per day
- The Spark plan caps storage at 1 GiB and network egress at 10 GiB per month
- Charging is per document read, so a query returning many documents bills for every one of them
- Going beyond the free thresholds requires the pay as you go Blaze plan billed at Google Cloud rates with no fixed monthly ceiling
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Pricing, plan by plan
Firestore
Free- SparkFree
- 1GB storage
- 50K reads/day
- 20K writes/day
- BlazeFree
- Pay as you go
- Unlimited operations
- Multi-region
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Firestore if
- You need document model.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Flutter.
- You also want real-time updates.
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Linux, Windows, API.
Questions people ask
- Is Firestore or Keycloak better?
- Neither clearly leads. Firestore starts at Free and Keycloak at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Firestore or Keycloak?
- Firestore starts at Free and Keycloak at Free.
- Does Firestore or Keycloak run on more platforms?
- Firestore runs on Web, iOS, Android, Flutter. Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Linux, Windows, API.
- Can I use Firestore for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Firestore best used for?
- Firestore is most often used for storing structured application data with realtime listeners, backing mobile and web apps with a serverless document database, building offline first apps that sync when connectivity returns. Of those, storing structured application data with realtime listeners and backing mobile and web apps with a serverless document database are not what Keycloak is typically brought in for.
- What can Firestore do that Keycloak cannot?
- Firestore covers Document Model, Real-time Updates, Offline Support, ACID Transactions.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Firestore: What are the free limits on Cloud Firestore?
The Spark Plan includes 1 GiB of stored data, 50,000 reads per day, 20,000 writes per day, and 20,000 deletes per day at no cost.
SourceKeycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceFirestore: What happens when I exceed the Spark Plan free tier?
Exceeding the free tier requires upgrading to the Blaze Plan, which bills based on actual usage through Google Cloud pricing. Charges apply for reads, writes, deletes, and data storage.
SourceKeycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceFirestore: Can I use Firestore without a credit card?
Yes, you can use the Spark Plan indefinitely without a credit card. To use the Blaze Plan (pay-as-you-go), a credit card is required.
SourceKeycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceFirestore: Is there a trial period for Cloud Firestore?
No trial period is specified. The Spark Plan free tier serves as the trial, with no time limit.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Firestore vs MongoDB
- Firestore vs Couchbase
- Firestore vs CouchDB
- Firestore vs RavenDB
- Firestore vs Supabase
- Firestore vs Estuary
- Firestore vs ArangoDB
- Firestore vs ClickHouse
- Firestore vs Redis
- Firestore vs DataGrip
- Firestore vs Firebolt
- Firestore vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Firestore vs QuestDB
- Firestore vs Vitess
- Firestore vs Apache Pinot
- Firestore vs Apache Kafka
- Firestore vs Apache Druid
- Firestore vs Cassandra
- Firestore vs Jenkins
- Firestore vs Atlantis
- Firestore vs Soketi
- Firestore vs Kubernetes
- Firestore vs GitLab
- Firestore vs Vite
- Firestore vs Depot
- Firestore vs Ansible
- Firestore vs Buildkite
- Firestore vs Coder
- Firestore vs Bitbucket
- Firestore vs Sweep
- Firestore vs Git
- Firestore vs GitHub Desktop
- Firestore vs GoLand
- Firestore vs Hookdeck
- Firestore vs Istio
- Firestore vs JFrog Artifactory
- Keycloak vs MongoDB
- Keycloak vs Couchbase
- Keycloak vs CouchDB
- Keycloak vs RavenDB
- Keycloak vs Supabase
- Keycloak vs Estuary
- Keycloak vs ArangoDB
- Keycloak vs ClickHouse
- Keycloak vs Redis
- Keycloak vs DataGrip
- Keycloak vs Firebolt
- Keycloak vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Keycloak vs QuestDB
- Keycloak vs Vitess
- Keycloak vs Apache Pinot
- Keycloak vs Apache Kafka
- Keycloak vs Apache Druid
- Keycloak vs Cassandra
- Keycloak vs Jenkins
- Keycloak vs Atlantis
- Keycloak vs Soketi
- Keycloak vs Kubernetes
- Keycloak vs GitLab
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Depot
- Keycloak vs Ansible
- Keycloak vs Buildkite
- Keycloak vs Coder
- Keycloak vs Bitbucket
- Keycloak vs Sweep
- Keycloak vs Git
- Keycloak vs GitHub Desktop
- Keycloak vs GoLand
- Keycloak vs Hookdeck
- Keycloak vs Istio
- Keycloak vs JFrog Artifactory
