Browser Extensions · head to head
FireMonkey vs Wireshark

FireMonkey
Browser Extensions
User scripts and user styles in one Firefox extension
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Wireshark
Cybersecurity
The world's foremost network protocol analyzer
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: FireMonkey firefox only, and requires a recent one: version 93 on desktop, 113 on Android.; Wireshark free and open source under the GNU GPL; downloadable without paying any license fee, no commercial tier
- They diverge on capability: FireMonkey covers Scripts and styles together, Wireshark covers Deep packet inspection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 15 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which FireMonkey and Wireshark actually diverge.
| Attribute | FireMonkey | Wireshark |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | free |
| Platforms | Firefox | Desktop, Cli |
| Category | Browser Extensions | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | Unknown | 1998 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in FireMonkey
- Scripts and styles together
- Monaco editor with ESLint
- Unlimited client-side storage
- Global injection
- Notifications and clipboard
- Firefox for Android
Only in Wireshark
- Deep packet inspection
- Live capture
- Offline analysis
- 3000+ protocol support
- Rich display filters
- VoIP analysis
- Decryption support
- Scripting with Lua
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
FireMonkey
- Running user scripts and user styles without two separate extensionsnot Wireshark
- Restyling sites with CSS alongside scripted behaviour changesnot Wireshark
- Editing scripts in a full editor inside the browsernot Wireshark
- Injecting CSS globally across every sitenot Wireshark
- Managing a mixed library of scripts and styles from one dashboardnot Wireshark
Wireshark
- Network Securitynot FireMonkey
- Packet Analysisnot FireMonkey
- Open Sourcenot FireMonkey
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
FireMonkey
- Firefox only, and requires a recent one: version 93 on desktop, 113 on Android.
- Not a drop-in replacement for Greasemonkey, Tampermonkey or Stylus. The project says so itself, so an existing library may need adjusting.
- A much smaller user base than Tampermonkey or Violentmonkey, which means fewer people have hit the bug you are about to hit.
- No Chrome, Edge or Safari build, so it cannot be the answer for anyone working across browsers.
- Combining scripts and styles in one extension also combines the blast radius: one extension with permission to inject both into every page.
Wireshark
- Free and open source under the GNU GPL; downloadable without paying any license fee, no commercial tier
Pricing, plan by plan
FireMonkey
Free- Open sourceFree
- MPL-2.0 licensed
- Unlimited scripts and styles
- No account required
Wireshark
Free- Free & Open SourceFree
- Full functionality
- Deep inspection
- Live capture
Which should you pick?
Choose FireMonkey if
- You need scripts and styles together.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Firefox.
- You also want monaco editor with eslint.
Choose Wireshark if
- You need deep packet inspection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli.
- You also want live capture.
Questions people ask
- Is FireMonkey or Wireshark better?
- Neither clearly leads. FireMonkey starts at Free and Wireshark at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, FireMonkey or Wireshark?
- FireMonkey starts at Free and Wireshark at Free.
- Does FireMonkey or Wireshark run on more platforms?
- FireMonkey runs on Firefox. Wireshark runs on Desktop, Cli.
- Can I use FireMonkey for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is FireMonkey best used for?
- FireMonkey is most often used for running user scripts and user styles without two separate extensions, restyling sites with css alongside scripted behaviour changes, editing scripts in a full editor inside the browser, injecting css globally across every site. Of those, running user scripts and user styles without two separate extensions and restyling sites with css alongside scripted behaviour changes are not what Wireshark is typically brought in for.
- What can FireMonkey do that Wireshark cannot?
- FireMonkey covers Scripts and styles together, Monaco editor with ESLint, Unlimited client-side storage, Global injection. Wireshark covers Deep packet inspection, Live capture, Offline analysis, 3000+ protocol support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
FireMonkey: What makes FireMonkey different from Violentmonkey?
It manages user styles as well as user scripts. The usual arrangement is a script manager plus a separate style manager such as Stylus; FireMonkey replaces both with one extension.
SourceWireshark: Is there a cost to download and use Wireshark?
No, Wireshark is completely free. It's distributed under the GNU General Public License version 2, making it "free software" with no demo limitations. The full version is available at no cost.
SourceFireMonkey: Which browsers does FireMonkey support?
Firefox only. Desktop requires Firefox 93 or later and Android requires 113, with an API minimum of 102.
SourceWireshark: What support options are available for Wireshark users?
Wireshark offers multiple support channels including mailing lists, an active Discord community, the Ask Wireshark Q&A platform, comprehensive documentation, a user guide, and developer resources for those needing technical assistance.
SourceFireMonkey: Is FireMonkey open source?
Yes, under the MPL-2.0 licence.
SourceWireshark: Are there different pricing tiers or subscription levels?
Wireshark does not offer pricing tiers or subscriptions. There is one free version available to all users regardless of use case, personal, professional, or organizational.
SourceFireMonkey: Will my existing Tampermonkey scripts work?
Not necessarily. The project states that while it shares functionality with Greasemonkey, Tampermonkey and Stylus, there are differences, so scripts and styles written for those may need adjusting.
SourceFireMonkey: What editor does FireMonkey use?
Current versions use the Monaco editor with ESLint, the same editor component that powers VS Code.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- FireMonkey vs Greasemonkey
- FireMonkey vs Violentmonkey
- FireMonkey vs Tampermonkey
- FireMonkey vs Userscripts
- FireMonkey vs Stay
- FireMonkey vs GoFullPage
- FireMonkey vs Stylus
- FireMonkey vs Pocket
- FireMonkey vs Dark Reader
- FireMonkey vs Raindrop.io
- FireMonkey vs Privacy Badger
- FireMonkey vs AdBlock Plus
- FireMonkey vs Night Eye
- FireMonkey vs React Developer Tools
- FireMonkey vs Save to Google Drive
- FireMonkey vs Vimeo Record
- FireMonkey vs Vue.js Devtools
- FireMonkey vs 1Password
- FireMonkey vs Bitdefender Total Security
- FireMonkey vs Norton 360
- FireMonkey vs LastPass
- FireMonkey vs Bitwarden
- FireMonkey vs OWASP ZAP
- FireMonkey vs Syft
- FireMonkey vs Metasploit
- FireMonkey vs Cosign
- FireMonkey vs HashiCorp Vault
- FireMonkey vs Infisical
- FireMonkey vs Semgrep
- FireMonkey vs Fenergo
- FireMonkey vs Google Authenticator
- FireMonkey vs Hanwha Vision
- FireMonkey vs Idira
- FireMonkey vs IVPN
- FireMonkey vs Grype
- Wireshark vs Greasemonkey
- Wireshark vs Violentmonkey
- Wireshark vs Tampermonkey
- Wireshark vs Userscripts
- Wireshark vs Stay
- Wireshark vs GoFullPage
- Wireshark vs Stylus
- Wireshark vs Pocket
- Wireshark vs Dark Reader
- Wireshark vs Raindrop.io
- Wireshark vs Privacy Badger
- Wireshark vs AdBlock Plus
- Wireshark vs Night Eye
- Wireshark vs React Developer Tools
- Wireshark vs Save to Google Drive
- Wireshark vs Vimeo Record
- Wireshark vs Vue.js Devtools
- Wireshark vs 1Password
- Wireshark vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Wireshark vs Norton 360
- Wireshark vs LastPass
- Wireshark vs Bitwarden
- Wireshark vs OWASP ZAP
- Wireshark vs Syft
- Wireshark vs Metasploit
- Wireshark vs Cosign
- Wireshark vs HashiCorp Vault
- Wireshark vs Infisical
- Wireshark vs Semgrep
- Wireshark vs Fenergo
- Wireshark vs Google Authenticator
- Wireshark vs Hanwha Vision
- Wireshark vs Idira
- Wireshark vs IVPN
- Wireshark vs Grype
