Browser Extensions · head to head
FireMonkey vs Infisical

FireMonkey
Browser Extensions
User scripts and user styles in one Firefox extension
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Infisical
Cybersecurity
Security infrastructure for developers and AI agents
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: FireMonkey firefox only, and requires a recent one: version 93 on desktop, 113 on Android.; Infisical free tier limited to 5 identities, suitable only for small teams or evaluation
- They diverge on capability: FireMonkey covers Scripts and styles together, Infisical covers Secrets management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 15 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which FireMonkey and Infisical actually diverge.
| Attribute | FireMonkey | Infisical |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | Unknown |
| Platforms | Firefox | Web, CLI, Cloud, Self-Hosted |
| Category | Browser Extensions | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in FireMonkey
- Scripts and styles together
- Monaco editor with ESLint
- Unlimited client-side storage
- Global injection
- Notifications and clipboard
- Firefox for Android
Only in Infisical
- Secrets management
- Certificate management
- Privileged access management
- Secret versioning
- Dynamic secrets
- SAML SSO
- Open-source core
- Secrets scanning
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
FireMonkey
- Running user scripts and user styles without two separate extensionsnot Infisical
- Restyling sites with CSS alongside scripted behaviour changesnot Infisical
- Editing scripts in a full editor inside the browsernot Infisical
- Injecting CSS globally across every sitenot Infisical
- Managing a mixed library of scripts and styles from one dashboardnot Infisical
Infisical
- Managing secrets across Kubernetes clustersnot FireMonkey
- Automating certificate lifecycle for internal PKInot FireMonkey
- Providing privileged database access with audit trailsnot FireMonkey
- Securing credentials for AI agents at runtimenot FireMonkey
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
FireMonkey
- Firefox only, and requires a recent one: version 93 on desktop, 113 on Android.
- Not a drop-in replacement for Greasemonkey, Tampermonkey or Stylus. The project says so itself, so an existing library may need adjusting.
- A much smaller user base than Tampermonkey or Violentmonkey, which means fewer people have hit the bug you are about to hit.
- No Chrome, Edge or Safari build, so it cannot be the answer for anyone working across browsers.
- Combining scripts and styles in one extension also combines the blast radius: one extension with permission to inject both into every page.
Infisical
- Free tier limited to 5 identities, suitable only for small teams or evaluation
- Pricing tiers are per-identity, which scales costs with team size
- Certificate management requires Enterprise plan for advanced features like wildcards
- Privileged access tier is separate billing from secrets management
Pricing, plan by plan
FireMonkey
Free- Open sourceFree
- MPL-2.0 licensed
- Unlimited scripts and styles
- No account required
Infisical
Free- FreeFree
- 5 identities
- Unlimited projects
- 3 environments
- Pro - Secrets$20/month
- Per-identity pricing
- Unlimited identities
- SAML SSO
- Pro - Secrets (Annual)$20/year
- Annual discount available
- Unlimited identities
- SAML SSO
- Advanced - Secrets$40/month
- Per-identity pricing
- Dynamic secrets
- Gateways
Which should you pick?
Choose FireMonkey if
- You need scripts and styles together.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Firefox.
- You also want monaco editor with eslint.
Choose Infisical if
- You need secrets management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI, Cloud, Self-Hosted.
- You also want certificate management.
Questions people ask
- Is FireMonkey or Infisical better?
- Neither clearly leads. FireMonkey starts at Free and Infisical at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, FireMonkey or Infisical?
- FireMonkey starts at Free and Infisical at Free.
- Does FireMonkey or Infisical run on more platforms?
- FireMonkey runs on Firefox. Infisical runs on Web, CLI, Cloud, Self-Hosted.
- Can I use FireMonkey for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is FireMonkey best used for?
- FireMonkey is most often used for running user scripts and user styles without two separate extensions, restyling sites with css alongside scripted behaviour changes, editing scripts in a full editor inside the browser, injecting css globally across every site. Of those, running user scripts and user styles without two separate extensions and restyling sites with css alongside scripted behaviour changes are not what Infisical is typically brought in for.
- What can FireMonkey do that Infisical cannot?
- FireMonkey covers Scripts and styles together, Monaco editor with ESLint, Unlimited client-side storage, Global injection. Infisical covers Secrets management, Certificate management, Privileged access management, Secret versioning.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
FireMonkey: What makes FireMonkey different from Violentmonkey?
It manages user styles as well as user scripts. The usual arrangement is a script manager plus a separate style manager such as Stylus; FireMonkey replaces both with one extension.
SourceInfisical: How is pricing calculated for Secrets Management?
Pricing is per-identity per month. Free tier includes 5 identities. Pro tier is $20/identity/month, Advanced is $40/identity/month. All pricing in USD.
SourceFireMonkey: Which browsers does FireMonkey support?
Firefox only. Desktop requires Firefox 93 or later and Android requires 113, with an API minimum of 102.
SourceInfisical: Can I self-host Infisical?
Yes, Infisical's core is open-source under the MIT license and can be self-hosted. The managed cloud service is also available with additional features.
SourceFireMonkey: Is FireMonkey open source?
Yes, under the MPL-2.0 licence.
SourceInfisical: What is included in the Enterprise plan?
Enterprise plan includes SCIM, LDAP, approval workflows, external KMS/HSM support, and 99.99% SLA. Pricing is custom and determined by annual commitment.
SourceFireMonkey: Will my existing Tampermonkey scripts work?
Not necessarily. The project states that while it shares functionality with Greasemonkey, Tampermonkey and Stylus, there are differences, so scripts and styles written for those may need adjusting.
SourceFireMonkey: What editor does FireMonkey use?
Current versions use the Monaco editor with ESLint, the same editor component that powers VS Code.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- FireMonkey vs Greasemonkey
- FireMonkey vs Violentmonkey
- FireMonkey vs Tampermonkey
- FireMonkey vs Userscripts
- FireMonkey vs Stay
- FireMonkey vs GoFullPage
- FireMonkey vs Stylus
- FireMonkey vs Pocket
- FireMonkey vs Dark Reader
- FireMonkey vs Raindrop.io
- FireMonkey vs Privacy Badger
- FireMonkey vs AdBlock Plus
- FireMonkey vs Night Eye
- FireMonkey vs React Developer Tools
- FireMonkey vs Save to Google Drive
- FireMonkey vs Vimeo Record
- FireMonkey vs Vue.js Devtools
- FireMonkey vs Akeyless
- FireMonkey vs Doppler
- FireMonkey vs HashiCorp Vault
- FireMonkey vs Chainguard
- FireMonkey vs Authelia
- FireMonkey vs Bitwarden
- FireMonkey vs Delinea
- FireMonkey vs Semgrep
- FireMonkey vs Trivy
- FireMonkey vs Grype
- FireMonkey vs Ory Kratos
- FireMonkey vs Legit Security
- FireMonkey vs LogRhythm SIEM
- FireMonkey vs Metasploit
- FireMonkey vs MetricStream
- FireMonkey vs Microsoft Defender
- FireMonkey vs Ory
- FireMonkey vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Infisical vs Greasemonkey
- Infisical vs Violentmonkey
- Infisical vs Tampermonkey
- Infisical vs Userscripts
- Infisical vs Stay
- Infisical vs GoFullPage
- Infisical vs Stylus
- Infisical vs Pocket
- Infisical vs Dark Reader
- Infisical vs Raindrop.io
- Infisical vs Privacy Badger
- Infisical vs AdBlock Plus
- Infisical vs Night Eye
- Infisical vs React Developer Tools
- Infisical vs Save to Google Drive
- Infisical vs Vimeo Record
- Infisical vs Vue.js Devtools
- Infisical vs Akeyless
- Infisical vs Doppler
- Infisical vs HashiCorp Vault
- Infisical vs Chainguard
- Infisical vs Authelia
- Infisical vs Bitwarden
- Infisical vs Delinea
- Infisical vs Semgrep
- Infisical vs Trivy
- Infisical vs Grype
- Infisical vs Ory Kratos
- Infisical vs Legit Security
- Infisical vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Infisical vs Metasploit
- Infisical vs MetricStream
- Infisical vs Microsoft Defender
- Infisical vs Ory
- Infisical vs Microsoft Sentinel
