Developer Tools · head to head
Fig vs shadcn/ui
Fig
Developer Tools
IDE-style autocomplete for your existing terminal
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

shadcn/ui
Web Development
Copy-paste React components you own, not a dependency
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fig shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete; shadcn/ui no upgrade path: once copied, upstream fixes and improvements are yours to port by hand
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fig and shadcn/ui actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fig
Nothing recorded that shadcn/ui does not also cover.
Only in shadcn/ui
- Copy, not install
- Radix primitives
- Tailwind styling
- Themeable
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fig
No use cases recorded yet. See the Fig review.
shadcn/ui
- Projects already using Tailwind that need accessible components without a theming fightnot Fig
- Design systems that will diverge from any library’s defaults anywaynot Fig
- Teams who have been burned by breaking changes in component library upgradesnot Fig
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fig
- Shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- The standalone desktop app is no longer available or supported
- The completion specs remain open source on GitHub, but the product that consumed them is gone
shadcn/ui
- No upgrade path: once copied, upstream fixes and improvements are yours to port by hand
- Requires Tailwind and React, so it is not an option outside that stack
- Component code lives in your repository, which grows it and puts maintenance on your team
- Its popularity has made the default look recognisable, which undercuts the customisation argument
Pricing, plan by plan
Fig
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fig review.
shadcn/ui
Free- shadcn/uiFree
- Full functionality
- Commercial use permitted
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose shadcn/ui if
- You need copy, not install.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want radix primitives.
Questions people ask
- Is Fig or shadcn/ui better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fig starts at Free and shadcn/ui at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fig or shadcn/ui?
- Fig starts at Free and shadcn/ui at Free.
- Does Fig or shadcn/ui run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Fig for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What can Fig do that shadcn/ui cannot?
- shadcn/ui covers Copy, not install, Radix primitives, Tailwind styling, Themeable.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
shadcn/ui: Is shadcn/ui free?
Yes, open source and free for commercial use.
shadcn/ui: Why is it not an npm package?
So you own the code. Components are copied into your project, which makes customisation trivial — at the cost of receiving no automatic updates.
shadcn/ui: Do I need Tailwind?
Yes. Components are styled with Tailwind utility classes and built on Radix primitives, so both are required.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Fig vs Visual Studio Code
- Fig vs ESLint
- Fig vs Turborepo
- Fig vs pnpm
- Fig vs Sweep
- Fig vs Cody
- Fig vs Warp
- Fig vs Keycloak
- Fig vs Rust
- Fig vs CodeSandbox
- Fig vs Vite
- Fig vs Daytona
- Fig vs Visual Studio
- Fig vs Xlinesoft
- Fig vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Fig vs Sourcegraph
- Fig vs MUI
- Fig vs Radix UI
- Fig vs Tailwind CSS
- Fig vs Chakra UI
- Fig vs Docusaurus
- Fig vs Bootstrap
- Fig vs v0 by Vercel
- Fig vs React
- Fig vs Remix
- Fig vs Lit
- Fig vs SolidJS
- Fig vs Apache HTTP Server
- Fig vs Bolt.new
- Fig vs .NET
- Fig vs Drupal
- Fig vs Express.js
- Fig vs FastAPI
- Fig vs Next.js
- shadcn/ui vs Visual Studio Code
- shadcn/ui vs ESLint
- shadcn/ui vs Turborepo
- shadcn/ui vs pnpm
- shadcn/ui vs Sweep
- shadcn/ui vs Cody
- shadcn/ui vs Warp
- shadcn/ui vs Keycloak
- shadcn/ui vs Rust
- shadcn/ui vs CodeSandbox
- shadcn/ui vs Vite
- shadcn/ui vs Daytona
- shadcn/ui vs Visual Studio
- shadcn/ui vs Xlinesoft
- shadcn/ui vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- shadcn/ui vs Sourcegraph
- shadcn/ui vs MUI
- shadcn/ui vs Radix UI
- shadcn/ui vs Tailwind CSS
- shadcn/ui vs Chakra UI
- shadcn/ui vs Docusaurus
- shadcn/ui vs Bootstrap
- shadcn/ui vs v0 by Vercel
- shadcn/ui vs React
- shadcn/ui vs Remix
- shadcn/ui vs Lit
- shadcn/ui vs SolidJS
- shadcn/ui vs Apache HTTP Server
- shadcn/ui vs Bolt.new
- shadcn/ui vs .NET
- shadcn/ui vs Drupal
- shadcn/ui vs Express.js
- shadcn/ui vs FastAPI
- shadcn/ui vs Next.js
