AI · head to head
Fathom vs Qovery

Qovery
Cloud
Deployment platform that provisions and operates Kubernetes inside your own cloud account
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Fathom has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Fathom team plan requires minimum 2 users; cannot purchase single seat at team pricing; Qovery no plan publishes a price, deployment minute overage rates are not disclosed, and there is a 14 day trial rather than a free tier, so you cannot budget or compare against alternatives without going through sales.
- They diverge on capability: Fathom covers Auto-recording, Qovery covers Bring your own cloud.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fathom and Qovery actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fathom
- Auto-recording
- AI summaries
- Transcription
- Highlight clips
- Zoom
- Google Meet
- HubSpot
- Salesforce
Only in Qovery
- Bring your own cloud
- Preview environments
- Cluster lifecycle
- Terraform provider
- MCP server
- Policy as code
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fathom
- AI-powered meeting transcription and automatic note-taking for sales teams and professionalsnot Qovery
- Meeting analysis with AI scorecards and action item generation that syncs to CRMsnot Qovery
Qovery
- A regulated business that must keep application data inside its own AWS account but has nobody to build a deployment platformnot Fathom
- Giving twenty engineers preview environments per pull request without writing and maintaining Terraform and Helm by handnot Fathom
- Standardising deployment across AWS and GCP when acquisitions have left the organisation on two cloudsnot Fathom
- Replacing a managed platform when data residency rules put every hosted option out of reachnot Fathom
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fathom
- Team plan requires minimum 2 users; cannot purchase single seat at team pricing
- CRM field sync and deal view summaries available only on Business plan ($34/user/month) and above
Qovery
- No plan publishes a price, deployment minute overage rates are not disclosed, and there is a 14 day trial rather than a free tier, so you cannot budget or compare against alternatives without going through sales.
- The GPL-3.0 engine and console do not constitute a self-hostable product, because the control plane and API are closed and the self-hosted option is gated behind Enterprise, so the open licence gives you no exit if the company changes direction.
- Qovery provisions managed Kubernetes into your account, which means the cloud bill sits on top of the licence and Qovery initiates control plane and ingress controller upgrades on infrastructure your team is accountable for.
- The company repositioned to agentic infrastructure in June 2026 and now ships a deployment platform, a browser development portal and autonomous coding agents concurrently, so a buyer of the deployment product is not at the centre of the roadmap.
- Team and Business are capped at two and three connected clusters with fixed 4 vCPU CI runners and no single sign-on on Team, which pushes teams of moderate size onto quoted Enterprise pricing earlier than the plan names imply.
Pricing, plan by plan
Fathom
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fathom review.
Qovery
On request- Team$undefined/year
- Billed on usage with no published rate card
- 10 users, up to 100 environments, 2 connected clusters
- 5,000 deployment minutes and 7 day audit logs
- Business$undefined/year
- Billed on usage with no published rate card
- 20 users, up to 250 environments, 3 connected clusters
- 10,000 deployment minutes and 30 day audit logs
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom users, environments and clusters
- Self-hosted or air-gapped control plane
- On-premises and bring-your-own-Kubernetes
Which should you pick?
Choose Fathom if
- You need auto-recording.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams.
- You also want ai summaries.
Choose Qovery if
- You need bring your own cloud.
- You work on Web, CLI, REST API, Kubernetes.
- You also want preview environments.
Questions people ask
- Is Fathom or Qovery better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fathom starts at Free and Qovery at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fathom or Qovery?
- Fathom has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Fathom and On request for Qovery.
- Does Fathom or Qovery run on more platforms?
- Fathom runs on Web, Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams. Qovery runs on Web, CLI, REST API, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Fathom for free?
- Yes. Fathom has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Qovery starts at On request.
- What is Fathom best used for?
- Fathom is most often used for ai-powered meeting transcription and automatic note-taking for sales teams and professionals, meeting analysis with ai scorecards and action item generation that syncs to crms. Of those, ai-powered meeting transcription and automatic note-taking for sales teams and professionals and meeting analysis with ai scorecards and action item generation that syncs to crms are not what Qovery is typically brought in for.
- What can Fathom do that Qovery cannot?
- Fathom covers Auto-recording, AI summaries, Transcription, Highlight clips. Qovery covers Bring your own cloud, Preview environments, Cluster lifecycle, Terraform provider.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Fathom: What is the most affordable paid plan for individuals, and what does it include?
Fathom Premium costs $20 per month (or $16 per month billed annually). It includes advanced summaries, action items, and a conversational AI assistant, in addition to the features in the free plan.
SourceQovery: Does Qovery run my applications on its own servers?
No. It provisions and operates Kubernetes inside your AWS, GCP, Azure or Scaleway account, so compute and data stay with your cloud provider and that bill is entirely separate from the Qovery licence.
Fathom: What is included in Fathom's free plan?
The free plan includes unlimited recordings, transcriptions, AI summaries, clips, and playlists at no cost forever.
SourceQovery: Can I self-host Qovery?
Only on Enterprise. The deployment engine and console are GPL-3.0, but the control plane is closed source and the self-hosted and air-gapped deployments are commercial Enterprise features.
Fathom: How much does the Team plan cost per user, and what features does it add?
The Team plan costs $19 per month per user (minimum 2 users, or $15 per month annually). It includes everything from Premium plus global search, collaboration features, and team playlists.
SourceQovery: What does it cost?
Qovery does not publish a rate card. Team and Business are billed on usage and quoted through sales, and Enterprise is fully custom. There is a 14 day trial with no card required.
Fathom: What trial or guarantee is available before committing to a paid plan?
All paid plans offer a 90-day guarantee to test features risk-free.
SourceQovery: What survives if I stop paying?
The Kubernetes cluster and the workloads keep running in your cloud account, but you lose the console, the deployment pipeline, preview environments and every process built on top of them.
Fathom: Does Fathom offer free or discounted plans for startups or nonprofits?
Yes, qualified portfolio companies get up to 2 years free, and nonprofits can apply for 10 free seats.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Fathom vs Stable Diffusion
- Fathom vs Together AI
- Fathom vs AI21 Labs
- Fathom vs Banana
- Fathom vs DeepSeek
- Fathom vs Grok
- Fathom vs NotebookLM
- Fathom vs RunPod
- Fathom vs Pika
- Fathom vs D-ID
- Fathom vs Anthropic API
- Fathom vs ChatGPT
- Fathom vs Rev
- Fathom vs Aider
- Fathom vs Lambda Labs
- Fathom vs Leonardo AI
- Fathom vs Murf
- Fathom vs Render
- Fathom vs Porter
- Fathom vs Northflank
- Fathom vs CapRover
- Fathom vs Coolify
- Fathom vs Railway
- Fathom vs Dokku
- Fathom vs Scaleway
- Fathom vs Portworx
- Fathom vs Podman
- Fathom vs containerd
- Fathom vs Encore
- Fathom vs Oracle Cloud
- Fathom vs Orca Security
- Fathom vs Packer
- Fathom vs OpenTelemetry
- Fathom vs Rook
- Qovery vs Stable Diffusion
- Qovery vs Together AI
- Qovery vs AI21 Labs
- Qovery vs Banana
- Qovery vs DeepSeek
- Qovery vs Grok
- Qovery vs NotebookLM
- Qovery vs RunPod
- Qovery vs Pika
- Qovery vs D-ID
- Qovery vs Anthropic API
- Qovery vs ChatGPT
- Qovery vs Rev
- Qovery vs Aider
- Qovery vs Lambda Labs
- Qovery vs Leonardo AI
- Qovery vs Murf
- Qovery vs Render
- Qovery vs Porter
- Qovery vs Northflank
- Qovery vs CapRover
- Qovery vs Coolify
- Qovery vs Railway
- Qovery vs Dokku
- Qovery vs Scaleway
- Qovery vs Portworx
- Qovery vs Podman
- Qovery vs containerd
- Qovery vs Encore
- Qovery vs Oracle Cloud
- Qovery vs Orca Security
- Qovery vs Packer
- Qovery vs OpenTelemetry
- Qovery vs Rook

