Cybersecurity · head to head
Falco vs Zscaler Internet Access

Falco
Cybersecurity
CNCF-graduated runtime threat detection for Linux and Kubernetes using eBPF
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Zscaler Internet Access
Cybersecurity
Secure cloud-native internet and SaaS access
- From
- $100/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Falco has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Falco falco detects and alerts but does not block; stopping an attack requires wiring up Falco Talon or your own response tooling, so out of the box a confirmed detection still means a human intervening after the fact.; Zscaler Internet Access the pricing page names two base tiers, Essentials Platform and Zscaler Platform, plus modular add ons including three Digital Experience Monitoring tiers, but publishes no dollar figures anywhere and routes buyers to a demo request for cost
- They diverge on capability: Falco covers eBPF kernel instrumentation, Zscaler Internet Access covers Secure web gateway.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Falco and Zscaler Internet Access actually diverge.
| Attribute | Falco | Zscaler Internet Access |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $100/year |
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Linux, Kubernetes, Self-hosted | Web, Desktop, Mobile |
| Founded | Unknown | 2007 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Falco
- eBPF kernel instrumentation
- System call rules engine
- Container and Kubernetes context
- Default rule set
- Falcosidekick
- Falco Talon
- Plugins framework
- DaemonSet deployment
Only in Zscaler Internet Access
- Secure web gateway
- Cloud firewall
- URL filtering
- Advanced threat protection
- Data loss prevention
- Cloud sandbox
- Browser isolation
- CASB
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Falco
- A platform team that needs to know when a shell is opened inside a production container, which image scanning cannot detect because it happens at runtimenot Zscaler Internet Access
- A regulated business required to evidence host and container intrusion detection on Kubernetes nodes for an auditnot Zscaler Internet Access
- A security team wanting a vendor-neutral detection layer whose rules they can read and modify rather than a black-box agentnot Zscaler Internet Access
- A cluster where a compromised dependency might write to sensitive paths or open unexpected outbound connections, and only kernel-level visibility will catch itnot Zscaler Internet Access
Zscaler Internet Access
- Cloud Securitynot Falco
- Zero Trustnot Falco
- Web Securitynot Falco
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Falco
- Falco detects and alerts but does not block; stopping an attack requires wiring up Falco Talon or your own response tooling, so out of the box a confirmed detection still means a human intervening after the fact.
- The default rule set is noisy in real clusters and generates a large volume of benign matches from normal operational activity; without weeks of tuning, alert fatigue sets in and the team stops reading the feed, which is the usual failure mode.
- There is no storage, console, search or case management in the project, so a working detection capability means also running Falcosidekick, an event store, a dashboard and alert routing, all of which you build, host and maintain.
- The modern eBPF driver requires kernel 5.8 or later; older hosts fall back to the legacy probe or the kernel module, which brings driver-building against kernel headers and the operational fragility that comes with it on every kernel upgrade.
- Per-node syscall instrumentation carries measurable CPU overhead on busy hosts, and the cost scales with syscall volume rather than with cluster size, so the noisiest and most performance-sensitive workloads are exactly the ones that feel it most.
Zscaler Internet Access
- The pricing page names two base tiers, Essentials Platform and Zscaler Platform, plus modular add ons including three Digital Experience Monitoring tiers, but publishes no dollar figures anywhere and routes buyers to a demo request for cost
Pricing, plan by plan
Falco
Free- Falco (open source)Free
- Apache 2.0 licence, CNCF graduated project
- eBPF and kernel module drivers
- Full rules engine and default rule set
Zscaler Internet Access
$100/year- ZIA Business$100/year
- Web security
- URL filtering
- Cloud firewall
- ZIA Transformation$200/year
- All Business features
- Advanced threat protection
- Cloud sandbox
- ZIA Unlimited$350/year
- All Transformation features
- Cloud browser isolation
- CASB
Which should you pick?
Choose Falco if
- You need ebpf kernel instrumentation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want system call rules engine.
Choose Zscaler Internet Access if
- You need secure web gateway.
- You work on Web, Desktop, Mobile.
- You also want cloud firewall.
Questions people ask
- Is Falco or Zscaler Internet Access better?
- Neither clearly leads. Falco starts at Free and Zscaler Internet Access at $100/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Falco or Zscaler Internet Access?
- Falco has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Falco and $100/year for Zscaler Internet Access.
- Does Falco or Zscaler Internet Access run on more platforms?
- Falco runs on Linux, Kubernetes, Self-hosted. Zscaler Internet Access runs on Web, Desktop, Mobile.
- Can I use Falco for free?
- Yes. Falco has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Zscaler Internet Access starts at $100/year.
- What is Falco best used for?
- Falco is most often used for a platform team that needs to know when a shell is opened inside a production container, which image scanning cannot detect because it happens at runtime, a regulated business required to evidence host and container intrusion detection on kubernetes nodes for an audit, a security team wanting a vendor-neutral detection layer whose rules they can read and modify rather than a black-box agent, a cluster where a compromised dependency might write to sensitive paths or open unexpected outbound connections, and only kernel-level visibility will catch it. Of those, a platform team that needs to know when a shell is opened inside a production container, which image scanning cannot detect because it happens at runtime and a regulated business required to evidence host and container intrusion detection on kubernetes nodes for an audit are not what Zscaler Internet Access is typically brought in for.
- What can Falco do that Zscaler Internet Access cannot?
- Falco covers eBPF kernel instrumentation, System call rules engine, Container and Kubernetes context, Default rule set. Zscaler Internet Access covers Secure web gateway, Cloud firewall, URL filtering, Advanced threat protection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Falco: Does Falco block attacks?
No. It detects and emits events. Response requires Falco Talon or your own automation on top.
Zscaler Internet Access: How many pricing tiers does Zscaler Internet Access offer?
Zscaler Internet Access offers two main platform bundles: the Essentials Platform (entry-level) and the Zscaler Platform (comprehensive). Specific pricing is not published online.
SourceFalco: Is Falco owned by Sysdig?
Sysdig created and open sourced it, but it graduated within the CNCF in February 2024, so governance sits with the foundation rather than the vendor.
Zscaler Internet Access: Are there optional add-on modules available?
Yes. Zscaler offers extensive optional capabilities in five categories including Inline Cyberthreat Protection, Private Access enhancements, Data Security, Security Operations, and Zero Trust Branch.
SourceFalco: What does it cost?
The project is Apache 2.0 with no licence fee. The cost is the storage, routing, tuning and staff time needed to make its output useful.
Zscaler Internet Access: How is Zscaler Zero Trust Branch priced?
Zero Trust Branch is sized by encrypted throughput (200 Mbps to 10 Gbps) or endpoint count (200 to 5,000 endpoints), with pricing varying by configuration.
SourceFalco: What kernel version do I need?
Kernel 5.8 or later for the default modern eBPF driver. Older hosts need the legacy eBPF probe or the kernel module.
Zscaler Internet Access: How do I get Zscaler pricing?
Zscaler does not publish pricing online. You must request a demo or contact their sales team to receive a pricing quote.
SourceRelated pages
More on Zscaler Internet Access
Other head to heads
- Falco vs Snyk
- Falco vs Teleport
- Falco vs Darktrace
- Falco vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Falco vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Falco vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Falco vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Falco vs WireGuard
- Falco vs Bitwarden
- Falco vs Infisical
- Falco vs Semgrep
- Falco vs Trivy
- Falco vs One Identity
- Falco vs Ory Kratos
- Falco vs OWASP ZAP
- Falco vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Falco vs Passbolt
- Falco vs Ping Identity
- Falco vs Norton 360
- Falco vs 1Password
- Falco vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Falco vs LastPass
- Falco vs Qualys VMDR
- Falco vs Proofpoint
- Falco vs IBM QRadar
- Falco vs Recorded Future
- Falco vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Falco vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Falco vs Omada Identity
- Falco vs Ory
- Falco vs ProtonVPN
- Falco vs Resolver
- Falco vs Saviynt
- Falco vs Securiti
- Zscaler Internet Access vs Snyk
- Zscaler Internet Access vs Teleport
- Zscaler Internet Access vs Darktrace
- Zscaler Internet Access vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Zscaler Internet Access vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Zscaler Internet Access vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Zscaler Internet Access vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Zscaler Internet Access vs WireGuard
- Zscaler Internet Access vs Bitwarden
- Zscaler Internet Access vs Infisical
- Zscaler Internet Access vs Semgrep
- Zscaler Internet Access vs Trivy
- Zscaler Internet Access vs One Identity
- Zscaler Internet Access vs Ory Kratos
- Zscaler Internet Access vs OWASP ZAP
- Zscaler Internet Access vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Zscaler Internet Access vs Passbolt
- Zscaler Internet Access vs Ping Identity
- Zscaler Internet Access vs Norton 360
- Zscaler Internet Access vs 1Password
- Zscaler Internet Access vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Zscaler Internet Access vs LastPass
- Zscaler Internet Access vs Qualys VMDR
- Zscaler Internet Access vs Proofpoint
- Zscaler Internet Access vs IBM QRadar
- Zscaler Internet Access vs Recorded Future
- Zscaler Internet Access vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Zscaler Internet Access vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Zscaler Internet Access vs Omada Identity
- Zscaler Internet Access vs Ory
- Zscaler Internet Access vs ProtonVPN
- Zscaler Internet Access vs Resolver
- Zscaler Internet Access vs Saviynt
- Zscaler Internet Access vs Securiti
