Libraries · head to head
Evergreen ILS vs Lonboard

Lonboard
Maps
Python map rendering in Jupyter that skips GeoJSON and moves millions of features without choking
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Evergreen ILS server installation is supported only on Debian 10, 11, 12 and 13 and Ubuntu 22.04 and 24.04; Lonboard it is a notebook visualisation library, not a mapping application, so there is no editing, no layout, no map export for print and no sharing beyond distributing the notebook or an HTML file
- They diverge on capability: Evergreen ILS covers Circulation management, Lonboard covers GeoArrow binary transfer.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Evergreen ILS and Lonboard actually diverge.
| Attribute | Evergreen ILS | Lonboard |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Web, Desktop, Api | Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Category | Libraries | Maps |
| Founded | 2006 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Evergreen ILS
- Circulation management
- MARC cataloging
- Acquisitions
- Serials management
- OPAC with faceted search
- Patron management
- Offline circulation
- Consortia support
Only in Lonboard
- GeoArrow binary transfer
- GeoPandas input
- deck.gl layers
- Jupyter widget
- Large dataset handling
- Styling by attribute
- Open source licence
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Evergreen ILS
- Running a consortium-scale library catalogue and circulation systemnot Lonboard
- Self-hosting an open source integrated library system across multiple branchesnot Lonboard
Lonboard
- An analyst exploring a national road or parcel dataset in a notebook where pydeck or ipyleaflet becomes unusable at that sizenot Evergreen ILS
- A researcher publishing a reproducible analysis where the visualisation must run from the same script as the processingnot Evergreen ILS
- A data scientist joining spatial data to model outputs in pandas and needing to see the result immediately without exporting to a GISnot Evergreen ILS
- A team building an internal analysis pipeline on GeoParquet that wants rendering without a serialisation step in the middlenot Evergreen ILS
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Evergreen ILS
- Server installation is supported only on Debian 10, 11, 12 and 13 and Ubuntu 22.04 and 24.04
- PostgreSQL 14 is the minimum supported version
- OpenSRF 3.3.0 or later must be installed separately before Evergreen itself
- Installation is a manual multi-service process requiring a dedicated PostgreSQL superuser account and shell access
Lonboard
- It is a notebook visualisation library, not a mapping application, so there is no editing, no layout, no map export for print and no sharing beyond distributing the notebook or an HTML file
- Maintenance sits with Development Seed as an open source side output of a consultancy, so roadmap priorities follow client projects and there is no support contract to buy
- Layer coverage is a subset of deck.gl, so an analyst needing a less common layer type has to drop to pydeck or write JavaScript rather than staying in Python
- It expects data already in GeoPandas or Arrow form, which means the performance benefit depends on the rest of your pipeline being Arrow-friendly; reading a large Shapefile is still the slow step
- Rendering happens in the browser, so very large datasets are ultimately limited by the client machine's memory and GPU rather than by the server, and a laptop will still fail on data a workstation handles
Pricing, plan by plan
Evergreen ILS
Free- Self-HostedFree
- Full ILS functionality
- Circulation system
- OPAC
- Hosted (via partners)$200/month
- Everything in Self-Hosted
- Managed hosting
- Professional support
Lonboard
Free- LonboardFree
- Open source, no licence fee
- No usage limits
- Installed from PyPI or conda
Which should you pick?
Choose Evergreen ILS if
- You need circulation management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Desktop, Api.
- You also want marc cataloging.
Choose Lonboard if
- You need geoarrow binary transfer.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want geopandas input.
Questions people ask
- Is Evergreen ILS or Lonboard better?
- Neither clearly leads. Evergreen ILS starts at Free and Lonboard at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Evergreen ILS or Lonboard?
- Evergreen ILS starts at Free and Lonboard at Free.
- Does Evergreen ILS or Lonboard run on more platforms?
- Evergreen ILS runs on Web, Desktop, Api. Lonboard runs on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use Evergreen ILS for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Evergreen ILS best used for?
- Evergreen ILS is most often used for running a consortium-scale library catalogue and circulation system, self-hosting an open source integrated library system across multiple branches. Of those, running a consortium-scale library catalogue and circulation system and self-hosting an open source integrated library system across multiple branches are not what Lonboard is typically brought in for.
- What can Evergreen ILS do that Lonboard cannot?
- Evergreen ILS covers Circulation management, MARC cataloging, Acquisitions, Serials management. Lonboard covers GeoArrow binary transfer, GeoPandas input, deck.gl layers, Jupyter widget.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Evergreen ILS: Is Evergreen ILS free?
Yes, Evergreen ILS is a free open source library management system. The software is available at no cost for libraries and organizations to install, deploy, and customize according to their needs.
SourceLonboard: Why not just use pydeck?
pydeck serialises geometry to GeoJSON to reach the browser. Lonboard uses a binary GeoArrow pipeline, which is the reason it handles far larger datasets in the same notebook.
Evergreen ILS: Does Evergreen ILS offer commercial support or hosting?
Evergreen ILS website does not list commercial hosting or support services. As an open source project, it relies on community contributions and institutional deployments. Libraries may arrange custom support through integrators or consultants, but no official commercial offerings are detailed on the website.
SourceLonboard: Who maintains it?
Development Seed, a geospatial engineering consultancy, as an open source project. There is no commercial support offering.
Lonboard: Does it work outside Jupyter?
It is built as a Jupyter widget. Exporting to standalone HTML is possible, but the intended environment is a notebook.
Lonboard: Is it free for commercial use?
Yes, it is open source with no licence fee.
Related pages
More on Evergreen ILS
Other head to heads
- Evergreen ILS vs VuFind
- Evergreen ILS vs ArchivesSpace
- Evergreen ILS vs CONTENTdm
- Evergreen ILS vs Omeka
- Evergreen ILS vs DSpace
- Evergreen ILS vs Koha
- Evergreen ILS vs SirsiDynix Symphony
- Evergreen ILS vs CollectiveAccess
- Evergreen ILS vs Ant Design
- Evergreen ILS vs Libby
- Evergreen ILS vs Hoopla
- Evergreen ILS vs Vuetify
- Evergreen ILS vs Axiell Collections
- Evergreen ILS vs Base UI
- Evergreen ILS vs daisyUI
- Evergreen ILS vs Ex Libris Alma
- Evergreen ILS vs OCLC WorldShare Management Services
- Evergreen ILS vs deck.gl
- Evergreen ILS vs QGIS
- Evergreen ILS vs CARTO
- Evergreen ILS vs Fused
- Evergreen ILS vs Potree
- Evergreen ILS vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Evergreen ILS vs SAGA GIS
- Evergreen ILS vs GRASS GIS
- Evergreen ILS vs WhiteboxTools
- Evergreen ILS vs Kepler.gl
- Evergreen ILS vs Agisoft Metashape
- Evergreen ILS vs Leaflet
- Evergreen ILS vs Sygic GPS Navigation
- Evergreen ILS vs TomTom
- Evergreen ILS vs Transit
- Evergreen ILS vs Waze
- Evergreen ILS vs What3words
- Evergreen ILS vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Lonboard vs VuFind
- Lonboard vs ArchivesSpace
- Lonboard vs CONTENTdm
- Lonboard vs Omeka
- Lonboard vs DSpace
- Lonboard vs Koha
- Lonboard vs SirsiDynix Symphony
- Lonboard vs CollectiveAccess
- Lonboard vs Ant Design
- Lonboard vs Libby
- Lonboard vs Hoopla
- Lonboard vs Vuetify
- Lonboard vs Axiell Collections
- Lonboard vs Base UI
- Lonboard vs daisyUI
- Lonboard vs Ex Libris Alma
- Lonboard vs OCLC WorldShare Management Services
- Lonboard vs deck.gl
- Lonboard vs QGIS
- Lonboard vs CARTO
- Lonboard vs Fused
- Lonboard vs Potree
- Lonboard vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Lonboard vs SAGA GIS
- Lonboard vs GRASS GIS
- Lonboard vs WhiteboxTools
- Lonboard vs Kepler.gl
- Lonboard vs Agisoft Metashape
- Lonboard vs Leaflet
- Lonboard vs Sygic GPS Navigation
- Lonboard vs TomTom
- Lonboard vs Transit
- Lonboard vs Waze
- Lonboard vs What3words
- Lonboard vs TomTom Developer Portal

