Software · head to head
Evergreen ILS vs CONTENTdm

CONTENTdm
Software
Build, showcase, and preserve digital collections
- From
- $1495/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Evergreen ILS has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Evergreen ILS server installation is supported only on Debian 10, 11, 12 and 13 and Ubuntu 22.04 and 24.04; CONTENTdm pricing requires custom quote with no public pricing available
- They diverge on capability: Evergreen ILS covers Circulation management, CONTENTdm covers Digital collection management.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Evergreen ILS and CONTENTdm actually diverge.
| Attribute | Evergreen ILS | CONTENTdm |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $1495/year |
| Pricing model | open-source | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Desktop, Api | Cloud |
| Founded | 2006 | 1967 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Evergreen ILS
- Circulation management
- MARC cataloging
- Acquisitions
- Serials management
- OPAC with faceted search
- Patron management
- Offline circulation
- Consortia support
Only in CONTENTdm
- Digital collection management
- Metadata management
- Compound object support
- Full-text search
- Faceted browse
- IIIF viewer
- WorldCat integration
- Custom websites
Both cover
- Cloud deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Evergreen ILS
- Running a consortium-scale library catalogue and circulation systemnot CONTENTdm
- Self-hosting an open source integrated library system across multiple branchesnot CONTENTdm
CONTENTdm
- Digital collectionsnot Evergreen ILS
- Digitization projectsnot Evergreen ILS
- Archival collectionsnot Evergreen ILS
- Special collectionsnot Evergreen ILS
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Evergreen ILS
- Server installation is supported only on Debian 10, 11, 12 and 13 and Ubuntu 22.04 and 24.04
- PostgreSQL 14 is the minimum supported version
- OpenSRF 3.3.0 or later must be installed separately before Evergreen itself
- Installation is a manual multi-service process requiring a dedicated PostgreSQL superuser account and shell access
CONTENTdm
- Pricing requires custom quote with no public pricing available
- Expensive relative to open-source alternatives
Pricing, plan by plan
Evergreen ILS
Free- Self-HostedFree
- Full ILS functionality
- Circulation system
- OPAC
- Hosted (via partners)$200/month
- Everything in Self-Hosted
- Managed hosting
- Professional support
CONTENTdm
$1495/year- Basic$1495/year
- Up to 10,000 items
- 5GB storage
- Basic discovery
- Standard$2995/year
- Up to 50,000 items
- 25GB storage
- Custom branding
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Unlimited items
- Custom storage
- IIIF support
Which should you pick?
Choose Evergreen ILS if
- You need circulation management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Desktop, Api.
- You also want marc cataloging.
Choose CONTENTdm if
- You need digital collection management.
- You work on Cloud.
- You also want metadata management.
Questions people ask
- Is Evergreen ILS or CONTENTdm better?
- Neither clearly leads. Evergreen ILS starts at Free and CONTENTdm at $1495/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Evergreen ILS or CONTENTdm?
- Evergreen ILS has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Evergreen ILS and $1495/year for CONTENTdm.
- Does Evergreen ILS or CONTENTdm run on more platforms?
- Evergreen ILS runs on Web, Desktop, Api. CONTENTdm runs on Cloud.
- Can I use Evergreen ILS for free?
- Yes. Evergreen ILS has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. CONTENTdm starts at $1495/year.
- What is Evergreen ILS best used for?
- Evergreen ILS is most often used for running a consortium-scale library catalogue and circulation system, self-hosting an open source integrated library system across multiple branches. Of those, running a consortium-scale library catalogue and circulation system and self-hosting an open source integrated library system across multiple branches are not what CONTENTdm is typically brought in for.
- What can Evergreen ILS do that CONTENTdm cannot?
- Evergreen ILS covers Circulation management, MARC cataloging, Acquisitions, Serials management. CONTENTdm covers Digital collection management, Metadata management, Compound object support, Full-text search. Both handle Cloud deployment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CONTENTdm: What types of organizations use CONTENTdm?
CONTENTdm is used by libraries of all types including academic and research libraries, public libraries, historical societies, museums, and other cultural heritage institutions worldwide.
SourceCONTENTdm: Does CONTENTdm preserve digital collections?
Yes, CONTENTdm secures and monitors digital originals in a cloud-based preservation archive to ensure collections remain safe for the future.
SourceCONTENTdm: How much metadata access does CONTENTdm provide?
CONTENTdm allows libraries to describe digitized materials with structured metadata and provides access to over 153 million books and 169 million library-vetted tags.
SourceRelated pages
More on Evergreen ILS
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Evergreen ILS vs ArchivesSpace
- Evergreen ILS vs Omeka
- Evergreen ILS vs DSpace
- Evergreen ILS vs VuFind
- Evergreen ILS vs CollectiveAccess
- Evergreen ILS vs Koha
- Evergreen ILS vs Archivematica
- Evergreen ILS vs Axiell Collections
- Evergreen ILS vs Ex Libris Alma
- Evergreen ILS vs FOLIO
- Evergreen ILS vs LibraryThing for Libraries
- Evergreen ILS vs OCLC WorldShare Management Services
- Evergreen ILS vs SirsiDynix Symphony
- CONTENTdm vs ArchivesSpace
- CONTENTdm vs Omeka
- CONTENTdm vs DSpace
- CONTENTdm vs VuFind
- CONTENTdm vs CollectiveAccess
- CONTENTdm vs Koha
- CONTENTdm vs Archivematica
- CONTENTdm vs Axiell Collections
- CONTENTdm vs Ex Libris Alma
- CONTENTdm vs FOLIO
- CONTENTdm vs LibraryThing for Libraries
- CONTENTdm vs OCLC WorldShare Management Services
- CONTENTdm vs SirsiDynix Symphony

