Cloud · head to head
Encore vs HashiCorp Boundary

HashiCorp Boundary
Cybersecurity
Identity-aware session broker for infrastructure access without distributing credentials
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Encore limited language support (TypeScript and Go only); HashiCorp Boundary hashiCorp was acquired by IBM in February 2025 and Enterprise licensing now runs through IBM Passport Advantage; IBM has already retired HCP Vault Secrets, so Boundary's roadmap depends on IBM portfolio decisions rather than HashiCorp's own product strategy.
- They diverge on capability: Encore covers Local development environment, HashiCorp Boundary covers Identity-based access.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Encore and HashiCorp Boundary actually diverge.
| Attribute | Encore | HashiCorp Boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Web, CLI | Linux, macOS, Windows, Web |
| Category | Cloud | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Encore
- Local development environment
- Preview environments
- Infrastructure automation
- Cloud deployment
- Self-service operations
- Distributed tracing
Only in HashiCorp Boundary
- Identity-based access
- Just-in-time credentials
- Dynamic host catalogues
- Session recording
- Transparent sessions
- Multi-hop workers
- Audit logging
- Terraform provider
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Encore
- Building microservices with database provisioningnot HashiCorp Boundary
- Creating feature branch preview environmentsnot HashiCorp Boundary
- Deploying TypeScript and Go backends to AWS/GCPnot HashiCorp Boundary
HashiCorp Boundary
- A platform team replacing shared SSH keys and a bastion host so that leavers lose access the moment they are removed from the identity providernot Encore
- Granting contractors time-boxed database access without ever issuing them a credential they could keepnot Encore
- An estate where autoscaling replaces hosts continuously and a static access list is always out of datenot Encore
- Producing session recordings as evidence for an audit that requires proof of who touched production and what they rannot Encore
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Encore
- Limited language support (TypeScript and Go only)
- Pro tier requires per-member subscription pricing
- Additional resource costs beyond subscription for AWS/GCP provisioning
HashiCorp Boundary
- HashiCorp was acquired by IBM in February 2025 and Enterprise licensing now runs through IBM Passport Advantage; IBM has already retired HCP Vault Secrets, so Boundary's roadmap depends on IBM portfolio decisions rather than HashiCorp's own product strategy.
- Enterprise pricing is not published anywhere, and the features most organisations actually need for compliance, notably session recording, are Enterprise only, so the free community edition is rarely the version you end up buying.
- It solves access to infrastructure, not to applications; browser-based internal tools, SaaS admin consoles and APIs need a separate control, so Boundary is one component of a zero-trust programme rather than the whole thing.
- Running it yourself means operating controllers, worker nodes and a Postgres database in a highly available configuration, and if that control plane is down nobody can reach production, which makes it a new critical dependency.
- It is materially easier to adopt if you already run Vault and Terraform; teams without that ecosystem face a steeper learning curve than a device-based mesh product like Tailscale, for a similar access outcome.
Pricing, plan by plan
Encore
Free- StarterFree
- 2 free dev environments
- 1M distributed tracing events/month
- 7-day log retention
- Pro$49/month
- Unlimited free dev environments
- 20M tracing events/month
- 30-day log retention
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Enterprise security and compliance
- SSO/SAML
- Custom RBAC
HashiCorp Boundary
Free- Boundary Community EditionFree
- MPL 2.0 open source
- Self-hosted controllers and workers
- Identity-based target access
- Boundary Enterprise$undefined/year
- Session recording and playback
- Multi-hop and transparent sessions
- Multi-tenancy via scopes
Which should you pick?
Choose Encore if
- You need local development environment.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI.
- You also want preview environments.
Choose HashiCorp Boundary if
- You need identity-based access.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Web.
- You also want just-in-time credentials.
Questions people ask
- Is Encore or HashiCorp Boundary better?
- Neither clearly leads. Encore starts at Free and HashiCorp Boundary at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Encore or HashiCorp Boundary?
- Encore starts at Free and HashiCorp Boundary at Free.
- Does Encore or HashiCorp Boundary run on more platforms?
- Encore runs on Web, CLI. HashiCorp Boundary runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Web.
- Can I use Encore for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Encore best used for?
- Encore is most often used for building microservices with database provisioning, creating feature branch preview environments, deploying typescript and go backends to aws/gcp. Of those, building microservices with database provisioning and creating feature branch preview environments are not what HashiCorp Boundary is typically brought in for.
- What can Encore do that HashiCorp Boundary cannot?
- Encore covers Local development environment, Preview environments, Infrastructure automation, Cloud deployment. HashiCorp Boundary covers Identity-based access, Just-in-time credentials, Dynamic host catalogues, Session recording.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Encore: What happens after the free tier?
The Pro plan costs $49/member/month plus usage charges of $2.50 per resource and $99 per AWS/GCP environment.
SourceHashiCorp Boundary: Is Boundary open source?
The community edition is, under MPL 2.0. Boundary Enterprise is commercial and is now sold through IBM Passport Advantage.
Encore: Do I own my infrastructure?
Yes, Encore deploys infrastructure in your own AWS or GCP cloud account, so you maintain complete control and avoid vendor lock-in.
SourceHashiCorp Boundary: Does it replace a VPN?
For infrastructure access, largely yes. It grants a session to a specific target rather than putting the user on a network, but it does not cover browser-based internal applications.
HashiCorp Boundary: What does Boundary Enterprise cost?
HashiCorp does not publish Boundary pricing. It is quoted, and since the IBM acquisition it is transacted on IBM licensing paper.
HashiCorp Boundary: Do I need Vault to use it?
No, but the just-in-time credential brokering that makes Boundary worthwhile depends on Vault or an equivalent secrets store.
Related pages
More on HashiCorp Boundary
Other head to heads
- Encore vs Pulumi
- Encore vs Zeabur
- Encore vs Porter
- Encore vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Encore vs Hetzner Cloud
- Encore vs Linode
- Encore vs Vultr
- Encore vs Google Cloud Platform
- Encore vs Microsoft Azure
- Encore vs Nitric
- Encore vs SST
- Encore vs Heroku
- Encore vs Thanos
- Encore vs Zipkin
- Encore vs Anyscale
- Encore vs Fireworks AI
- Encore vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Encore vs BeyondTrust
- Encore vs Teleport
- Encore vs Delinea
- Encore vs Infisical
- Encore vs 1Password
- Encore vs LastPass
- Encore vs authentik
- Encore vs Logto
- Encore vs Ory
- Encore vs Saviynt
- Encore vs Beyond Identity
- Encore vs One Identity
- Encore vs Keygen
- Encore vs KnowBe4
- Encore vs Legit Security
- Encore vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Encore vs Metasploit
- Encore vs MetricStream
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Pulumi
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Zeabur
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Porter
- HashiCorp Boundary vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Hetzner Cloud
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Linode
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Vultr
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Google Cloud Platform
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Microsoft Azure
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Nitric
- HashiCorp Boundary vs SST
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Heroku
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Thanos
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Zipkin
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Anyscale
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Fireworks AI
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- HashiCorp Boundary vs BeyondTrust
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Teleport
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Delinea
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Infisical
- HashiCorp Boundary vs 1Password
- HashiCorp Boundary vs LastPass
- HashiCorp Boundary vs authentik
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Logto
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Ory
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Saviynt
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Beyond Identity
- HashiCorp Boundary vs One Identity
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Keygen
- HashiCorp Boundary vs KnowBe4
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Legit Security
- HashiCorp Boundary vs LogRhythm SIEM
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Metasploit
- HashiCorp Boundary vs MetricStream

