Cybersecurity · head to head
HashiCorp Boundary vs Zeabur

HashiCorp Boundary
Cybersecurity
Identity-aware session broker for infrastructure access without distributing credentials
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: HashiCorp Boundary hashiCorp was acquired by IBM in February 2025 and Enterprise licensing now runs through IBM Passport Advantage; IBM has already retired HCP Vault Secrets, so Boundary's roadmap depends on IBM portfolio decisions rather than HashiCorp's own product strategy.; Zeabur free plan limited to single server with 48-hour log retention
- They diverge on capability: HashiCorp Boundary covers Identity-based access, Zeabur covers AI Agent.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which HashiCorp Boundary and Zeabur actually diverge.
| Attribute | HashiCorp Boundary | Zeabur |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | Fixed monthly plans |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows, Web | Web, CLI |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Cloud |
| Founded | Unknown | 2025 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in HashiCorp Boundary
- Identity-based access
- Just-in-time credentials
- Dynamic host catalogues
- Session recording
- Transparent sessions
- Multi-hop workers
- Audit logging
- Terraform provider
Only in Zeabur
- AI Agent
- Managed Servers
- Domain and DNS Management
- Email Service
- AI Hub
- Deploy Templates
- Git Integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
HashiCorp Boundary
- A platform team replacing shared SSH keys and a bastion host so that leavers lose access the moment they are removed from the identity providernot Zeabur
- Granting contractors time-boxed database access without ever issuing them a credential they could keepnot Zeabur
- An estate where autoscaling replaces hosts continuously and a static access list is always out of datenot Zeabur
- Producing session recordings as evidence for an audit that requires proof of who touched production and what they rannot Zeabur
Zeabur
- Deploying full-stack web applications without DevOps expertisenot HashiCorp Boundary
- Building AI agent infrastructure with integrated API accessnot HashiCorp Boundary
- Managing multi-region deployments with automated scalingnot HashiCorp Boundary
- Running containerized services with built-in domain and emailnot HashiCorp Boundary
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
HashiCorp Boundary
- HashiCorp was acquired by IBM in February 2025 and Enterprise licensing now runs through IBM Passport Advantage; IBM has already retired HCP Vault Secrets, so Boundary's roadmap depends on IBM portfolio decisions rather than HashiCorp's own product strategy.
- Enterprise pricing is not published anywhere, and the features most organisations actually need for compliance, notably session recording, are Enterprise only, so the free community edition is rarely the version you end up buying.
- It solves access to infrastructure, not to applications; browser-based internal tools, SaaS admin consoles and APIs need a separate control, so Boundary is one component of a zero-trust programme rather than the whole thing.
- Running it yourself means operating controllers, worker nodes and a Postgres database in a highly available configuration, and if that control plane is down nobody can reach production, which makes it a new critical dependency.
- It is materially easier to adopt if you already run Vault and Terraform; teams without that ecosystem face a steeper learning curve than a device-based mesh product like Tailscale, for a similar access outcome.
Zeabur
- Free plan limited to single server with 48-hour log retention
- Small team size may limit support and feature velocity
- Building spec upgrades limited on lower tiers
- Enterprise support not clearly documented
Pricing, plan by plan
HashiCorp Boundary
Free- Boundary Community EditionFree
- MPL 2.0 open source
- Self-hosted controllers and workers
- Identity-based target access
- Boundary Enterprise$undefined/year
- Session recording and playback
- Multi-hop and transparent sessions
- Multi-tenancy via scopes
Zeabur
Free- FreeFree
- 1 manageable server
- 2C4G build specs
- 48-hour log retention
- Dev$5/month
- 3 manageable servers
- 7-day log retention
- 250 MB file uploads
- Pro$19/month
- 10 manageable servers
- 4C8G build specs
- 30-day log retention
- Team$79/month
- 3 included seats
- Unlimited manageable servers
- 90-day log retention
Which should you pick?
Choose HashiCorp Boundary if
- You need identity-based access.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Web.
- You also want just-in-time credentials.
Choose Zeabur if
- You need ai agent.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI.
- You also want managed servers.
Questions people ask
- Is HashiCorp Boundary or Zeabur better?
- Neither clearly leads. HashiCorp Boundary starts at Free and Zeabur at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, HashiCorp Boundary or Zeabur?
- HashiCorp Boundary starts at Free and Zeabur at Free.
- Does HashiCorp Boundary or Zeabur run on more platforms?
- HashiCorp Boundary runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Web. Zeabur runs on Web, CLI.
- Can I use HashiCorp Boundary for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is HashiCorp Boundary best used for?
- HashiCorp Boundary is most often used for a platform team replacing shared ssh keys and a bastion host so that leavers lose access the moment they are removed from the identity provider, granting contractors time-boxed database access without ever issuing them a credential they could keep, an estate where autoscaling replaces hosts continuously and a static access list is always out of date, producing session recordings as evidence for an audit that requires proof of who touched production and what they ran. Of those, a platform team replacing shared ssh keys and a bastion host so that leavers lose access the moment they are removed from the identity provider and granting contractors time-boxed database access without ever issuing them a credential they could keep are not what Zeabur is typically brought in for.
- What can HashiCorp Boundary do that Zeabur cannot?
- HashiCorp Boundary covers Identity-based access, Just-in-time credentials, Dynamic host catalogues, Session recording. Zeabur covers AI Agent, Managed Servers, Domain and DNS Management, Email Service.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
HashiCorp Boundary: Is Boundary open source?
The community edition is, under MPL 2.0. Boundary Enterprise is commercial and is now sold through IBM Passport Advantage.
Zeabur: What is included in the free plan?
The free plan includes 1 manageable server, 2C4G build specifications, 48-hour log retention, 50 MB file upload limit, and community support.
SourceHashiCorp Boundary: Does it replace a VPN?
For infrastructure access, largely yes. It grants a session to a specific target rather than putting the user on a network, but it does not cover browser-based internal applications.
Zeabur: How do additional seats work on the Team plan?
The Team plan includes 3 seats with additional seats available at $24 per seat per month.
SourceHashiCorp Boundary: What does Boundary Enterprise cost?
HashiCorp does not publish Boundary pricing. It is quoted, and since the IBM acquisition it is transacted on IBM licensing paper.
Zeabur: Is there a free trial period?
The Dev and Pro plans include 14 days free before billing begins.
SourceHashiCorp Boundary: Do I need Vault to use it?
No, but the just-in-time credential brokering that makes Boundary worthwhile depends on Vault or an equivalent secrets store.
Related pages
More on HashiCorp Boundary
Other head to heads
- HashiCorp Boundary vs BeyondTrust
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Teleport
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Delinea
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Infisical
- HashiCorp Boundary vs 1Password
- HashiCorp Boundary vs LastPass
- HashiCorp Boundary vs authentik
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Logto
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Ory
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Saviynt
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Beyond Identity
- HashiCorp Boundary vs One Identity
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Keygen
- HashiCorp Boundary vs KnowBe4
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Legit Security
- HashiCorp Boundary vs LogRhythm SIEM
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Metasploit
- HashiCorp Boundary vs MetricStream
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Railway
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Fly.io
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Porter
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Encore
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Vultr
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Hetzner Cloud
- HashiCorp Boundary vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Linode
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Google Cloud Platform
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Microsoft Azure
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Coolify
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Wasabi
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Terragrunt
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Thanos
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Zipkin
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Anyscale
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Fireworks AI
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Zeabur vs BeyondTrust
- Zeabur vs Teleport
- Zeabur vs Delinea
- Zeabur vs Infisical
- Zeabur vs 1Password
- Zeabur vs LastPass
- Zeabur vs authentik
- Zeabur vs Logto
- Zeabur vs Ory
- Zeabur vs Saviynt
- Zeabur vs Beyond Identity
- Zeabur vs One Identity
- Zeabur vs Keygen
- Zeabur vs KnowBe4
- Zeabur vs Legit Security
- Zeabur vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Zeabur vs Metasploit
- Zeabur vs MetricStream
- Zeabur vs Railway
- Zeabur vs Fly.io
- Zeabur vs Porter
- Zeabur vs Encore
- Zeabur vs Vultr
- Zeabur vs Hetzner Cloud
- Zeabur vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Zeabur vs Linode
- Zeabur vs Google Cloud Platform
- Zeabur vs Microsoft Azure
- Zeabur vs Coolify
- Zeabur vs Wasabi
- Zeabur vs Terragrunt
- Zeabur vs Thanos
- Zeabur vs Zipkin
- Zeabur vs Anyscale
- Zeabur vs Fireworks AI
- Zeabur vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)

