Insurance · head to head
Embroker vs Proofpoint

Proofpoint
Cybersecurity
Email security and data protection suite from a private company owned by Thoma Bravo, licensed per user with modules sold separately.
- From
- $6/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Embroker no pricing published on website; requires completing an application and underwriting process; Proofpoint licensing is per user per year with each capability as a separate stock item, so the platform shown in a proof of concept is normally several products, and adding awareness training, data loss prevention or insider threat monitoring later is a fresh negotiation rather than enabling a feature.
- They diverge on capability: Embroker covers Benefits management, Proofpoint covers Inline secure email gateway.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Embroker and Proofpoint actually diverge.
| Attribute | Embroker | Proofpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $6/month |
| Platforms | Web, Ios, Android | Email, Cloud, Web |
| Category | Insurance | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2017 | 2002 |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Embroker
- Benefits management
- Policy administration
- Employee portal
- Analytics and reporting
- Claims management
- Mobile app
- Compliance tools
- Integration support
Only in Proofpoint
- Inline secure email gateway
- Attachment sandboxing
- URL rewriting and click-time analysis
- Threat Response Auto-Pull
- Email Fraud Defense
- Security awareness training
- Insider Threat Management
- Enterprise DLP
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Embroker
- Employee benefits managementnot Proofpoint
Proofpoint
- A regulated organisation that needs a filtering layer, DMARC enforcement and archiving with an auditable trail across all threenot Embroker
- An organisation that suffered a business email compromise and must show its board a control that stops delivery rather than remediating afterwardsnot Embroker
- Concentrating stronger controls and training on the specific individuals who actually receive targeted attacks rather than applying uniform policynot Embroker
- Retracting a phishing message from thousands of mailboxes after the verdict changes, including copies that were forwarded internallynot Embroker
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Embroker
- No pricing published on website; requires completing an application and underwriting process
- Pricing varies by state and is subject to application approval
Proofpoint
- Licensing is per user per year with each capability as a separate stock item, so the platform shown in a proof of concept is normally several products, and adding awareness training, data loss prevention or insider threat monitoring later is a fresh negotiation rather than enabling a feature.
- It sits inline with MX records pointed at it, so any service degradation is a mail outage for the entire organisation, and both migrating on and migrating off are cutovers with queueing, rollback planning and a real risk of message loss.
- Most customers on Microsoft 365 E5 or Google Workspace Enterprise are already paying for native filtering, so Proofpoint is a second licence layered over a capability the organisation owns, and that comparison is raised by finance at every single renewal.
- The administration console carries a decade of acquisitions: the classic gateway policy routes and filters do not share a model with the newer module interfaces, rule evaluation is order-sensitive in ways that surprise untrained administrators, and mistakes there silently change what is delivered.
- Quarantine management is a standing helpdesk workload because legitimate bulk mail, invoices and supplier notifications are held, and unless end-user digests are configured and users are taught to use them, the security team becomes the mail release desk.
Pricing, plan by plan
Embroker
On request- Professional$undefined/month
- Benefits management
- Policy administration
- Employee portal
Proofpoint
$6/month- Email Protection$6/month
- Per user
- Advanced threat detection
- Data loss prevention
- Compliance$8/month
- All Email Protection
- Archive & search
- eDiscovery
- Advanced Threat$10/month
- All Compliance features
- Targeted attack detection
- Behavior analytics
Which should you pick?
Choose Embroker if
- You need benefits management.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want policy administration.
Choose Proofpoint if
- You need inline secure email gateway.
- You work on Email, Cloud, Web.
- You also want attachment sandboxing.
Questions people ask
- Is Embroker or Proofpoint better?
- Neither clearly leads. Embroker starts at On request and Proofpoint at $6/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Embroker or Proofpoint?
- Embroker starts at On request and Proofpoint at $6/month.
- Does Embroker or Proofpoint run on more platforms?
- Embroker runs on Web, Ios, Android. Proofpoint runs on Email, Cloud, Web.
- What is Embroker best used for?
- Embroker is most often used for employee benefits management. Of those, employee benefits management is not what Proofpoint is typically brought in for.
- What can Embroker do that Proofpoint cannot?
- Embroker covers Benefits management, Policy administration, Employee portal, Analytics and reporting. Proofpoint covers Inline secure email gateway, Attachment sandboxing, URL rewriting and click-time analysis, Threat Response Auto-Pull.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Embroker: How much does Embroker insurance cost?
Embroker does not publish pricing. The vendor emphasizes 'custom quotes in minutes' and positions themselves as offering 'transparent solutions.' Customers must click 'Get a Quote' to access the application portal. Services and pricing vary by state and are subject to application and underwriting requirements.
SourceProofpoint: Does it replace Microsoft Defender for Office 365?
Functionally it overlaps heavily, and running both means paying twice for filtering. Most Proofpoint customers on Microsoft 365 keep Defender licensed because it is bundled in E5 and use Proofpoint as the inline gateway. Expect to justify that duplication annually.
Embroker: How can you request a quote from Embroker?
Click the 'Get a Quote' button to access their application portal, or contact Embroker at 1.844.436.2765 (Mon-Fri) or use their contact form.
SourceProofpoint: Who owns Proofpoint?
Thoma Bravo, a private equity firm, which took the company private in 2021. It has continued to acquire since, including Tessian, Normalyze and Hornetsecurity, which is why the portfolio spans so many adjacent categories.
Proofpoint: Do I have to change my MX records?
For the gateway, yes. That is what makes it inline and able to block before delivery. Some newer capabilities integrate through the mailbox API instead, but the core protection model is MX-level.
Proofpoint: Is security awareness training included?
No, it is a separate subscription. It integrates well with the threat data, so training can target the users actually being attacked, but it is a distinct line item on the quote.
Proofpoint: What does Threat Response Auto-Pull actually do?
It removes messages from mailboxes after delivery when the verdict changes, including copies that users forwarded internally. It is the answer to the case where a link was clean at delivery and weaponised an hour later.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Embroker vs Guidewire ClaimCenter
- Embroker vs Duck Creek
- Embroker vs Duck Creek Policy
- Embroker vs Applied Epic
- Embroker vs Origami Risk
- Embroker vs Insurity Suite
- Embroker vs Majesco Policy for L&A
- Embroker vs Sapiens CoreSuite
- Embroker vs ClaimVantage
- Embroker vs FRISS
- Embroker vs Insureon
- Embroker vs Jenesis Software
- Embroker vs Kin Insurance
- Embroker vs Ladder
- Embroker vs Metromile
- Embroker vs Guidewire InsuranceNow
- Embroker vs Ivans
- Embroker vs Guidewire PolicyCenter
- Embroker vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Embroker vs Norton 360
- Embroker vs 1Password
- Embroker vs LastPass
- Embroker vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Embroker vs Mimecast
- Embroker vs Qualys VMDR
- Embroker vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Embroker vs IBM QRadar
- Embroker vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Embroker vs VMware Carbon Black
- Embroker vs Sysdig
- Embroker vs Dahua Technology
- Embroker vs Descope
- Embroker vs Drata
- Embroker vs DTiQ
- Embroker vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Embroker vs ExpressVPN
- Proofpoint vs Guidewire ClaimCenter
- Proofpoint vs Duck Creek
- Proofpoint vs Duck Creek Policy
- Proofpoint vs Applied Epic
- Proofpoint vs Origami Risk
- Proofpoint vs Insurity Suite
- Proofpoint vs Majesco Policy for L&A
- Proofpoint vs Sapiens CoreSuite
- Proofpoint vs ClaimVantage
- Proofpoint vs FRISS
- Proofpoint vs Insureon
- Proofpoint vs Jenesis Software
- Proofpoint vs Kin Insurance
- Proofpoint vs Ladder
- Proofpoint vs Metromile
- Proofpoint vs Guidewire InsuranceNow
- Proofpoint vs Ivans
- Proofpoint vs Guidewire PolicyCenter
- Proofpoint vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Proofpoint vs Norton 360
- Proofpoint vs 1Password
- Proofpoint vs LastPass
- Proofpoint vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Proofpoint vs Mimecast
- Proofpoint vs Qualys VMDR
- Proofpoint vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Proofpoint vs IBM QRadar
- Proofpoint vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Proofpoint vs VMware Carbon Black
- Proofpoint vs Sysdig
- Proofpoint vs Dahua Technology
- Proofpoint vs Descope
- Proofpoint vs Drata
- Proofpoint vs DTiQ
- Proofpoint vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Proofpoint vs ExpressVPN

