ERP · head to head
Ecount vs Zip

Zip
ERP
Procurement intake and orchestration that sits on top of the systems you already run
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Ecount mobile app provides only essential features, not full desktop functionality; Zip it is a layer on top of systems you already pay for, so the business case rests on adoption and cycle time rather than replacing a licence, and that is harder to defend to a finance director cutting software spend.
- They diverge on capability: Ecount covers Financial management, Zip covers Unified intake.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ecount and Zip actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (ERP).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ecount
- Financial management
- Manufacturing
- Supply chain
- Inventory
- CRM
- Multi-currency
- REST APIs
- Third-party systems
Only in Zip
- Unified intake
- Approval orchestration
- Vendor onboarding
- Contract repository
- ERP write-back
- Renewal management
- Spend visibility
- AI request handling
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ecount
- Asian market operationsnot Zip
- Multi-currency managementnot Zip
- Manufacturing optimizationnot Zip
- Regional compliancenot Zip
Zip
- A company that owns a source-to-pay suite nobody uses because employees cannot navigate itnot Ecount
- An organisation where every software purchase needs security, legal, privacy and finance sign-off and currently does it in email threadsnot Ecount
- A finance team that keeps discovering contracts that auto-renewed because nobody owned the renewal datenot Ecount
- A business needing an auditable record of who approved a third-party engagement and on what evidencenot Ecount
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ecount
- Mobile app provides only essential features, not full desktop functionality
- Complex navigation and setup requiring time investment and sometimes expert assistance
Zip
- It is a layer on top of systems you already pay for, so the business case rests on adoption and cycle time rather than replacing a licence, and that is harder to defend to a finance director cutting software spend.
- Value depends entirely on integration depth into your specific ERP and ticketing tools, and a shallow connector reduces it to a workflow tool that someone rekeys out of.
- Pricing is not published and is structured around company size and integration scope, so buyers cannot benchmark without peer references.
- If procurement policy itself is unclear, Zip encodes the confusion: the tool routes requests according to rules someone must first write, and organisations without that clarity see slow implementations.
- It does not do sourcing, auctions or spend analysis, so organisations expecting a full procurement capability will still need a suite or specialist tools alongside it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Ecount
$55/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Ecount review.
Zip
On request- Zip$undefined/year
- Intake and approval orchestration
- Vendor onboarding and diligence workflows
- Integrations with ERP, contract and ticketing systems
Which should you pick?
Choose Ecount if
- You need financial management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, macOS.
- You also want manufacturing.
Choose Zip if
- You need unified intake.
- You work on Web, iOS.
- You also want approval orchestration.
Questions people ask
- Is Ecount or Zip better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ecount starts at $55/month and Zip at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ecount or Zip?
- Ecount starts at $55/month and Zip at On request.
- Does Ecount or Zip run on more platforms?
- Ecount runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, macOS. Zip runs on Web, iOS.
- What is Ecount best used for?
- Ecount is most often used for asian market operations, multi-currency management, manufacturing optimization, regional compliance. Of those, asian market operations and multi-currency management are not what Zip is typically brought in for.
- What can Ecount do that Zip cannot?
- Ecount covers Financial management, Manufacturing, Supply chain, Inventory. Zip covers Unified intake, Approval orchestration, Vendor onboarding, Contract repository.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ecount: What is the pricing for Ecount ERP?
Ecount ERP costs $55 per month with unlimited users included. All features and unlimited users are available at this single tier, with no additional per-user fees.
SourceZip: Is this the buy now pay later company?
No. This is Zip at ziphq.com, a procurement orchestration platform, unrelated to the payments company of the same name.
Ecount: What platforms does Ecount support?
Ecount ERP is 100% web-based and cloud-based, accessible via Chrome, Edge, Safari and other browsers on Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android without software installation.
SourceZip: Does it replace Coupa or Ariba?
No, and that is the point. It sits in front of them, providing the intake and approval experience employees actually use, and writes back into the suite.
Ecount: Does Ecount offer integrations with other business systems?
Yes. Ecount integrates with 400+ business applications including payment systems, ecommerce platforms (eBay, Shopee, Lazada), shipping solutions, and custom systems via Open API.
SourceZip: What does it cost?
Not published. Quoted by company size, modules and the integrations you need. Get peer benchmarks before negotiating.
Ecount: What support does Ecount provide?
Ecount offers 24/7 customer support, on-site training, and video resources. The platform is ISO/IEC 27001 certified for security.
SourceZip: What is the prerequisite for success?
A written procurement policy. Zip automates the routing rules you give it; if nobody can say who approves what, implementation stalls.
Ecount: How long is the typical implementation time for Ecount?
Implementation varies but typically requires significant time investment for data migration from previous systems. Expert assistance may be needed depending on system complexity and customization needs.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Ecount vs Infor CloudSuite
- Ecount vs NetSuite
- Ecount vs Focus Softnet
- Ecount vs TOTVS
- Ecount vs MRPeasy
- Ecount vs Priority Software
- Ecount vs DEAR Systems
- Ecount vs Aptean
- Ecount vs QAD
- Ecount vs Kingdee
- Ecount vs Plex Manufacturing Cloud
- Ecount vs Protean ERP
- Ecount vs Ramco
- Ecount vs Rootstock
- Ecount vs Striven
- Ecount vs Oracle ERP Cloud
- Ecount vs QAD ERP
- Ecount vs Omnea
- Ecount vs Jaggaer
- Ecount vs Zycus
- Ecount vs Levelpath
- Ecount vs Ivalua
- Ecount vs SAP S/4HANA
- Ecount vs Metasfresh
- Ecount vs GEP SMART
- Ecount vs Deltek
- Ecount vs Axelor
- Ecount vs Axonaut
- Ecount vs BatchMaster
- Ecount vs bexio
- Ecount vs Bling
- Ecount vs Blue Link ERP
- Zip vs Infor CloudSuite
- Zip vs NetSuite
- Zip vs Focus Softnet
- Zip vs TOTVS
- Zip vs MRPeasy
- Zip vs Priority Software
- Zip vs DEAR Systems
- Zip vs Aptean
- Zip vs QAD
- Zip vs Kingdee
- Zip vs Plex Manufacturing Cloud
- Zip vs Protean ERP
- Zip vs Ramco
- Zip vs Rootstock
- Zip vs Striven
- Zip vs Oracle ERP Cloud
- Zip vs QAD ERP
- Zip vs Omnea
- Zip vs Jaggaer
- Zip vs Zycus
- Zip vs Levelpath
- Zip vs Ivalua
- Zip vs SAP S/4HANA
- Zip vs Metasfresh
- Zip vs GEP SMART
- Zip vs Deltek
- Zip vs Axelor
- Zip vs Axonaut
- Zip vs BatchMaster
- Zip vs bexio
- Zip vs Bling
- Zip vs Blue Link ERP

