Research · head to head
DNAnexus vs Wasabi

DNAnexus
Research
Regulated cloud platform for genomic and multiomic data, with GxP and FedRAMP coverage
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: DNAnexus no pricing is published, so an organisation cannot compare the total cost against running the same pipelines on its own cloud account until it is deep in a sales process.; Wasabi 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- They diverge on capability: DNAnexus covers Governed data storage, Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DNAnexus and Wasabi actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DNAnexus
- Governed data storage
- Workflow execution
- App building
- Controlled collaboration
- Compliance posture
- Cohort browsing
Only in Wasabi
- Hot Cloud Storage
- S3 Compatible API
- Object Lock
- Versioning
- Multi-region
- Data Migration Tools
- Immutability
- Ransomware Protection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DNAnexus
- A clinical diagnostics laboratory that needs a CLIA and CAP aligned environment for production sequencing pipelines without building the compliance evidence itselfnot Wasabi
- A pharma sponsor analysing genomic endpoints in a registrational programme where 21 CFR Part 11 records are requirednot Wasabi
- A biobank or consortium giving hundreds of external researchers governed access to a dataset too large to distributenot Wasabi
- A diagnostics vendor packaging its pipeline as a versioned app so partner laboratories can run it without receiving the source codenot Wasabi
Wasabi
- Backup and recoverynot DNAnexus
- Media storagenot DNAnexus
- Archive replacementnot DNAnexus
- Ransomware protectionnot DNAnexus
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DNAnexus
- No pricing is published, so an organisation cannot compare the total cost against running the same pipelines on its own cloud account until it is deep in a sales process.
- Compute and storage are billed through the platform rather than at underlying cloud list price, so the compliance envelope carries a persistent margin on every terabyte and core hour, which grows with the science rather than staying fixed.
- Data egress at genomic scale is slow and chargeable, so leaving the platform later is a real project rather than a contract decision, and that gravity weakens negotiating position at renewal.
- The regulated and validated configurations sit in a higher commercial tier than the research configuration, so an organisation that starts in research mode and later needs GxP faces a repricing rather than a setting change.
- Bioinformaticians used to running Nextflow on their own infrastructure find the platform abstractions constraining, and porting an existing pipeline into the app model is engineering work that does not carry over to any other platform.
Wasabi
- 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- Significantly smaller global footprint than AWS with only 16 regions, resulting in higher latency for users in underserved regions
- Performance can degrade with high-volume transactions requiring throughput management strategies
- Hot storage only, no cold/archival storage tier for long-term data at lower cost
- Support responsiveness gaps with teams experiencing multi-day waits for critical issue resolution
Pricing, plan by plan
DNAnexus
On request- DNAnexus Platform$undefined/year
- Quoted per organisation through a sales process
- Storage and compute billed through the platform rather than at cloud list price
- Regulated and validated configurations are a separate commercial tier
Wasabi
$7.99/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Wasabi review.
Which should you pick?
Choose DNAnexus if
- You need governed data storage.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want workflow execution.
Choose Wasabi if
- You need hot cloud storage.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want s3 compatible api.
Questions people ask
- Is DNAnexus or Wasabi better?
- Neither clearly leads. DNAnexus starts at On request and Wasabi at $7.99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DNAnexus or Wasabi?
- DNAnexus starts at On request and Wasabi at $7.99/month.
- Does DNAnexus or Wasabi run on more platforms?
- DNAnexus runs on Web, Linux. Wasabi runs on Web, API.
- What is DNAnexus best used for?
- DNAnexus is most often used for a clinical diagnostics laboratory that needs a clia and cap aligned environment for production sequencing pipelines without building the compliance evidence itself, a pharma sponsor analysing genomic endpoints in a registrational programme where 21 cfr part 11 records are required, a biobank or consortium giving hundreds of external researchers governed access to a dataset too large to distribute, a diagnostics vendor packaging its pipeline as a versioned app so partner laboratories can run it without receiving the source code. Of those, a clinical diagnostics laboratory that needs a clia and cap aligned environment for production sequencing pipelines without building the compliance evidence itself and a pharma sponsor analysing genomic endpoints in a registrational programme where 21 cfr part 11 records are required are not what Wasabi is typically brought in for.
- What can DNAnexus do that Wasabi cannot?
- DNAnexus covers Governed data storage, Workflow execution, App building, Controlled collaboration. Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage, S3 Compatible API, Object Lock, Versioning.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
DNAnexus: Why pay for DNAnexus instead of raw AWS?
For the compliance evidence. GxP, FedRAMP, CLIA, CAP and Part 11 coverage removes a validation programme most organisations would otherwise have to build and maintain themselves.
Wasabi: What is Wasabi's pricing structure?
Wasabi offers pay-as-you-go pricing at $7.99 per TB per month as of July 2026, with no egress or API request fees. Reserved capacity plans are available for multi-year terms with volume discounts.
SourceDNAnexus: Is validated use included?
No. Regulated and validated configurations sit in a separate commercial tier from ordinary research use.
Wasabi: Does Wasabi charge for data downloads or API calls?
No. Wasabi includes zero egress fees and zero API request fees, which is a major cost advantage over AWS S3. Customers can plan their budget to the penny without worrying about surprise data transfer charges.
SourceDNAnexus: Can I get my data out?
Yes, but egress at genomic scale is chargeable and slow, so plan exit costs at the point of signing.
Wasabi: Is there a minimum storage duration requirement?
Yes. Wasabi enforces a 90-day minimum storage term. Users who delete data before 90 days are still charged for the full 90-day period.
SourceDNAnexus: Does it host UK Biobank?
Yes, DNAnexus hosts the UK Biobank research analysis platform, which has its own access approval and cost terms.
Wasabi: Is Wasabi S3-compatible?
Yes. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is fully S3-compatible, meaning organizations can integrate it into existing workflows without rewriting application code used with AWS S3.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- DNAnexus vs Benchling
- DNAnexus vs Terra
- DNAnexus vs Seven Bridges
- DNAnexus vs Form Bio
- DNAnexus vs Labguru
- DNAnexus vs Dotmatics
- DNAnexus vs TetraScience
- DNAnexus vs Schrodinger
- DNAnexus vs LabWare
- DNAnexus vs STARLIMS
- DNAnexus vs Castor EDC
- DNAnexus vs Condens
- DNAnexus vs SurveySparrow
- DNAnexus vs Contentsquare
- DNAnexus vs LabArchives
- DNAnexus vs NVivo
- DNAnexus vs GWI
- DNAnexus vs Aurelius
- DNAnexus vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- DNAnexus vs DigitalOcean
- DNAnexus vs Hetzner Cloud
- DNAnexus vs Scaleway
- DNAnexus vs Linode
- DNAnexus vs Vultr
- DNAnexus vs Zeabur
- DNAnexus vs Porter
- DNAnexus vs Contabo
- DNAnexus vs Encore
- DNAnexus vs Google Cloud Platform
- DNAnexus vs Microsoft Azure
- DNAnexus vs HAProxy
- DNAnexus vs IBM Cloud
- DNAnexus vs kind
- DNAnexus vs Koyeb
- DNAnexus vs Kustomize
- DNAnexus vs Linkerd
- Wasabi vs Benchling
- Wasabi vs Terra
- Wasabi vs Seven Bridges
- Wasabi vs Form Bio
- Wasabi vs Labguru
- Wasabi vs Dotmatics
- Wasabi vs TetraScience
- Wasabi vs Schrodinger
- Wasabi vs LabWare
- Wasabi vs STARLIMS
- Wasabi vs Castor EDC
- Wasabi vs Condens
- Wasabi vs SurveySparrow
- Wasabi vs Contentsquare
- Wasabi vs LabArchives
- Wasabi vs NVivo
- Wasabi vs GWI
- Wasabi vs Aurelius
- Wasabi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Wasabi vs DigitalOcean
- Wasabi vs Hetzner Cloud
- Wasabi vs Scaleway
- Wasabi vs Linode
- Wasabi vs Vultr
- Wasabi vs Zeabur
- Wasabi vs Porter
- Wasabi vs Contabo
- Wasabi vs Encore
- Wasabi vs Google Cloud Platform
- Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure
- Wasabi vs HAProxy
- Wasabi vs IBM Cloud
- Wasabi vs kind
- Wasabi vs Koyeb
- Wasabi vs Kustomize
- Wasabi vs Linkerd

