Cybersecurity · head to head
Diligent vs WorkOS

Diligent
Cybersecurity
Board management and enterprise GRC platform assembled from Galvanize, Steele and Diligent Boards
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

WorkOS
Cybersecurity
Developer platform for enterprise-ready authentication and identity.
- From
- $125/one-time per connection
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Diligent the platform is an assembly of acquisitions, with the analytics engine from ACL, risk from Rsam, ethics and third-party diligence from Steele and the board portal from Diligent itself, so cross-module reporting and consistent user experience should be tested in a proof of concept rather than assumed.; WorkOS authKit free tier limited to 1 million monthly active users; additional millions cost $2,500/month
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Diligent and WorkOS actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Diligent
- Diligent Boards
- Entity management
- Audit and analytics
- Risk management
- Third-party risk
- Ethics and compliance
- ESG and sustainability
- Market intelligence
Only in WorkOS
Nothing recorded that Diligent does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Diligent
- A listed company that wants board papers, entity records and the audit committee reporting pack produced from one governance systemnot WorkOS
- An internal audit function moving from sampling to full-population transaction testing using the ACL heritage analytics enginenot WorkOS
- A regulated firm consolidating a whistleblower hotline, third-party due diligence and policy attestation after an enforcement findingnot WorkOS
- A group needing sustainability disclosure data collected with the same audit trail and controls as financial reportingnot WorkOS
WorkOS
- SaaS applications needing rapid enterprise SSO deploymentnot Diligent
- Companies selling to mid-market and enterprise customersnot Diligent
- Applications requiring SCIM directory sync with corporate identity systemsnot Diligent
- Product teams needing audit logs for compliance (SOC 2, ISO 27001)not Diligent
- Platforms with multiple identity provider requirementsnot Diligent
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Diligent
- The platform is an assembly of acquisitions, with the analytics engine from ACL, risk from Rsam, ethics and third-party diligence from Steele and the board portal from Diligent itself, so cross-module reporting and consistent user experience should be tested in a proof of concept rather than assumed.
- Pricing is unpublished and consistently at the top of the market, and organisations that need only one capability, a board portal or an audit analytics tool, generally pay less and get more from a specialist.
- Renewal leverage is weak once the board portal is embedded, because directors are the least willing user group to be migrated and that dependency is well understood by the vendor at renewal time.
- The analytics engine expects real data skills, and audit teams without an analytics-capable member typically use a fraction of what they licensed while paying for all of it.
- Module-by-module implementation means the promised single view of governance and risk usually arrives years after the first purchase, if the later modules are ever funded.
WorkOS
- AuthKit free tier limited to 1 million monthly active users; additional millions cost $2,500/month
- Per-connection pricing for SSO and Directory Sync ($125–$50 each) scales poorly for enterprises with many identity providers
- Audit logs require separate subscription at $125/month per SIEM connection or $99/month per 1 million events
- Radar fraud protection billed separately at $100/month per 50,000 additional checks beyond 1,000 free checks
- Custom domain feature requires $99/month subscription
- Requires annual commitment for SLA and support guarantees; pay-as-you-go tier lacks uptime guarantee
Pricing, plan by plan
Diligent
On request- Diligent One Platform$undefined/year
- Quoted by module and user count
- Board portal seats priced separately from GRC modules
- Annual subscription, commonly multi-year
WorkOS
$125/one-time per connection- Pay as You Go$undefined/variable
- Per-connection pricing from $125 to $50 with volume discounts
- Up to 60% discount at scale
- Quick deployment
- Annual Credits$undefined/variable
- Custom pricing with volume discounts
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Guided migration
Which should you pick?
Choose Diligent if
- You need diligent boards.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows.
- You also want entity management.
Questions people ask
- Is Diligent or WorkOS better?
- Neither clearly leads. Diligent starts at On request and WorkOS at $125/one-time per connection, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Diligent or WorkOS?
- Diligent starts at On request and WorkOS at $125/one-time per connection.
- Does Diligent or WorkOS run on more platforms?
- Diligent runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows. WorkOS runs on Web, API.
- What is Diligent best used for?
- Diligent is most often used for a listed company that wants board papers, entity records and the audit committee reporting pack produced from one governance system, an internal audit function moving from sampling to full-population transaction testing using the acl heritage analytics engine, a regulated firm consolidating a whistleblower hotline, third-party due diligence and policy attestation after an enforcement finding, a group needing sustainability disclosure data collected with the same audit trail and controls as financial reporting. Of those, a listed company that wants board papers, entity records and the audit committee reporting pack produced from one governance system and an internal audit function moving from sampling to full-population transaction testing using the acl heritage analytics engine are not what WorkOS is typically brought in for.
- What can Diligent do that WorkOS cannot?
- Diligent covers Diligent Boards, Entity management, Audit and analytics, Risk management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Diligent: Is Diligent One the same product as Galvanize?
It contains it. Diligent bought Galvanize, the ACL and Rsam merger, for around one billion dollars in April 2021, and its audit analytics and risk modules are that heritage rebranded into Diligent One.
WorkOS: How quickly can I implement WorkOS SSO?
Developers can implement single sign-on in minutes instead of months. Multiple customers report setting up SSO in less than a week, with WorkOS handling the complexity of SAML and OIDC protocols.
SourceDiligent: What does Diligent cost?
Not published. It is quoted by module and user, and board portal seats are priced differently from GRC seats. Expect an annual or multi-year enterprise agreement.
WorkOS: What SDKs does WorkOS provide?
WorkOS offers SDKs for Node.js, Python, Ruby, Go, PHP, Java, and .NET.
SourceDiligent: Can you buy just the board portal?
Yes, Diligent Boards is sold on its own and is the most common entry point. The GRC modules are separate purchases.
WorkOS: Does WorkOS support SCIM provisioning?
Yes. WorkOS supports SCIM provisioning integration with systems like Okta and Entra ID for automated user management.
SourceDiligent: Does it replace a SOC 2 automation tool?
No. Diligent is aimed at enterprise audit, risk and governance, not at automated evidence collection for security certifications.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Diligent vs LogicManager
- Diligent vs Resolver
- Diligent vs MetricStream
- Diligent vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Diligent vs Transcend
- Diligent vs OneTrust
- Diligent vs Milestone XProtect
- Diligent vs Camio
- Diligent vs Delinea
- Diligent vs Dahua Technology
- Diligent vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Diligent vs IBM QRadar
- Diligent vs Trivy
- Diligent vs Trulioo
- Diligent vs Unit21
- Diligent vs Veracode
- Diligent vs Very Good Security
- Diligent vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Diligent vs 1Password
- Diligent vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Diligent vs Norton 360
- Diligent vs LastPass
- Diligent vs JumpCloud
- Diligent vs Logto
- Diligent vs Authelia
- Diligent vs Authy
- Diligent vs Clerk
- Diligent vs Mullvad VPN
- Diligent vs Doppler
- Diligent vs Malwarebytes
- Diligent vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Diligent vs Netwrix
- Diligent vs NordVPN
- Diligent vs Microsoft Intune
- WorkOS vs LogicManager
- WorkOS vs Resolver
- WorkOS vs MetricStream
- WorkOS vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- WorkOS vs Transcend
- WorkOS vs OneTrust
- WorkOS vs Milestone XProtect
- WorkOS vs Camio
- WorkOS vs Delinea
- WorkOS vs Dahua Technology
- WorkOS vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- WorkOS vs IBM QRadar
- WorkOS vs Trivy
- WorkOS vs Trulioo
- WorkOS vs Unit21
- WorkOS vs Veracode
- WorkOS vs Very Good Security
- WorkOS vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- WorkOS vs 1Password
- WorkOS vs Bitdefender Total Security
- WorkOS vs Norton 360
- WorkOS vs LastPass
- WorkOS vs JumpCloud
- WorkOS vs Logto
- WorkOS vs Authelia
- WorkOS vs Authy
- WorkOS vs Clerk
- WorkOS vs Mullvad VPN
- WorkOS vs Doppler
- WorkOS vs Malwarebytes
- WorkOS vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- WorkOS vs Netwrix
- WorkOS vs NordVPN
- WorkOS vs Microsoft Intune
