Cybersecurity · head to head
Diligent vs Vanta

Diligent
Cybersecurity
Board management and enterprise GRC platform assembled from Galvanize, Steele and Diligent Boards
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Vanta
Cybersecurity
Compliance automation platform for SOC 2, ISO 27001 and similar frameworks.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Diligent the platform is an assembly of acquisitions, with the analytics engine from ACL, risk from Rsam, ethics and third-party diligence from Steele and the board portal from Diligent itself, so cross-module reporting and consistent user experience should be tested in a proof of concept rather than assumed.; Vanta no published pricing for any tier; all plans require requesting a demo and contacting sales
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Diligent and Vanta actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Diligent
- Diligent Boards
- Entity management
- Audit and analytics
- Risk management
- Third-party risk
- Ethics and compliance
- ESG and sustainability
- Market intelligence
Only in Vanta
Nothing recorded that Diligent does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Diligent
- A listed company that wants board papers, entity records and the audit committee reporting pack produced from one governance systemnot Vanta
- An internal audit function moving from sampling to full-population transaction testing using the ACL heritage analytics enginenot Vanta
- A regulated firm consolidating a whistleblower hotline, third-party due diligence and policy attestation after an enforcement findingnot Vanta
- A group needing sustainability disclosure data collected with the same audit trail and controls as financial reportingnot Vanta
Vanta
- SaaS and fintech companies needing rapid SOC 2 certification for enterprise salesnot Diligent
- Healthcare organisations automating HIPAA compliance managementnot Diligent
- European companies managing GDPR and privacy compliancenot Diligent
- Organisations implementing ISO 27001 and other security standardsnot Diligent
- Companies conducting vendor security assessments and managing third-party risknot Diligent
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Diligent
- The platform is an assembly of acquisitions, with the analytics engine from ACL, risk from Rsam, ethics and third-party diligence from Steele and the board portal from Diligent itself, so cross-module reporting and consistent user experience should be tested in a proof of concept rather than assumed.
- Pricing is unpublished and consistently at the top of the market, and organisations that need only one capability, a board portal or an audit analytics tool, generally pay less and get more from a specialist.
- Renewal leverage is weak once the board portal is embedded, because directors are the least willing user group to be migrated and that dependency is well understood by the vendor at renewal time.
- The analytics engine expects real data skills, and audit teams without an analytics-capable member typically use a fraction of what they licensed while paying for all of it.
- Module-by-module implementation means the promised single view of governance and risk usually arrives years after the first purchase, if the later modules are ever funded.
Vanta
- No published pricing for any tier; all plans require requesting a demo and contacting sales
- Essentials tier limited to one compliance framework; organisations needing multiple frameworks must upgrade to higher tiers
- Plus and Professional tiers feature unclear differentiation; specific pricing and included questionnaires not published
- Enterprise pricing fully custom; no transparency on costs or what features are included
- AI questionnaire automation capped at 25 annually in Plus tier, only 144 annually in Professional tier
Pricing, plan by plan
Diligent
On request- Diligent One Platform$undefined/year
- Quoted by module and user count
- Board portal seats priced separately from GRC modules
- Annual subscription, commonly multi-year
Vanta
On request- Essentials$undefined/variable
- One compliance framework
- Vanta AI Agent features
- Automated evidence collection
- Plus$undefined/variable
- All Essentials features
- Enhanced AI Agent capabilities
- AI-powered questionnaire automation (25 annually)
- Professional$undefined/variable
- All Plus features
- 144 questionnaires annually (marked 'Most Popular')
- Risk management tools
- Enterprise$undefined/variable
- Fully customisable package
- Flexible, scalable, advanced compliance
- Tailored to sophisticated GRC requirements
Which should you pick?
Choose Diligent if
- You need diligent boards.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows.
- You also want entity management.
Questions people ask
- Is Diligent or Vanta better?
- Neither clearly leads. Diligent starts at On request and Vanta at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Diligent or Vanta?
- Diligent starts at On request and Vanta at On request.
- Does Diligent or Vanta run on more platforms?
- Diligent runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows. Vanta runs on Web, API.
- What is Diligent best used for?
- Diligent is most often used for a listed company that wants board papers, entity records and the audit committee reporting pack produced from one governance system, an internal audit function moving from sampling to full-population transaction testing using the acl heritage analytics engine, a regulated firm consolidating a whistleblower hotline, third-party due diligence and policy attestation after an enforcement finding, a group needing sustainability disclosure data collected with the same audit trail and controls as financial reporting. Of those, a listed company that wants board papers, entity records and the audit committee reporting pack produced from one governance system and an internal audit function moving from sampling to full-population transaction testing using the acl heritage analytics engine are not what Vanta is typically brought in for.
- What can Diligent do that Vanta cannot?
- Diligent covers Diligent Boards, Entity management, Audit and analytics, Risk management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Diligent: Is Diligent One the same product as Galvanize?
It contains it. Diligent bought Galvanize, the ACL and Rsam merger, for around one billion dollars in April 2021, and its audit analytics and risk modules are that heritage rebranded into Diligent One.
Vanta: How many compliance frameworks does Vanta support?
Vanta supports 35+ compliance frameworks including SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR and custom frameworks.
SourceDiligent: What does Diligent cost?
Not published. It is quoted by module and user, and board portal seats are priced differently from GRC seats. Expect an annual or multi-year enterprise agreement.
Vanta: Does Vanta automate questionnaires?
Yes. Vanta's AI Agent can automate questionnaire completion, with the number of annually supported questionnaires varying by plan (25 in Plus tier, 144 in Professional tier).
SourceDiligent: Can you buy just the board portal?
Yes, Diligent Boards is sold on its own and is the most common entry point. The GRC modules are separate purchases.
Vanta: How many integrations does Vanta support?
Vanta integrates with 300+ pre-built system connections and supports over 90% automation of compliance tasks through these integrations.
SourceDiligent: Does it replace a SOC 2 automation tool?
No. Diligent is aimed at enterprise audit, risk and governance, not at automated evidence collection for security certifications.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Diligent vs LogicManager
- Diligent vs Resolver
- Diligent vs MetricStream
- Diligent vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Diligent vs Transcend
- Diligent vs OneTrust
- Diligent vs Milestone XProtect
- Diligent vs Camio
- Diligent vs Delinea
- Diligent vs Dahua Technology
- Diligent vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Diligent vs IBM QRadar
- Diligent vs Trivy
- Diligent vs Trulioo
- Diligent vs Unit21
- Diligent vs Veracode
- Diligent vs Very Good Security
- Diligent vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Diligent vs Norton 360
- Diligent vs 1Password
- Diligent vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Diligent vs LastPass
- Diligent vs Drata
- Diligent vs NICE Actimize
- Diligent vs ThetaRay
- Diligent vs Omada Identity
- Diligent vs Saviynt
- Diligent vs Metasploit
- Diligent vs Microsoft Defender
- Diligent vs Mimecast
- Diligent vs Motorola Vigilant
- Diligent vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Vanta vs LogicManager
- Vanta vs Resolver
- Vanta vs MetricStream
- Vanta vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Vanta vs Transcend
- Vanta vs OneTrust
- Vanta vs Milestone XProtect
- Vanta vs Camio
- Vanta vs Delinea
- Vanta vs Dahua Technology
- Vanta vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Vanta vs IBM QRadar
- Vanta vs Trivy
- Vanta vs Trulioo
- Vanta vs Unit21
- Vanta vs Veracode
- Vanta vs Very Good Security
- Vanta vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Vanta vs Norton 360
- Vanta vs 1Password
- Vanta vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Vanta vs LastPass
- Vanta vs Drata
- Vanta vs NICE Actimize
- Vanta vs ThetaRay
- Vanta vs Omada Identity
- Vanta vs Saviynt
- Vanta vs Metasploit
- Vanta vs Microsoft Defender
- Vanta vs Mimecast
- Vanta vs Motorola Vigilant
- Vanta vs Microsoft Sentinel
