Cloud · head to head
Deno Deploy vs Keycloak

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Deno Deploy smaller ecosystem compared to AWS Lambda with fewer third-party integrations; Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Deno Deploy and Keycloak actually diverge.
| Attribute | Deno Deploy | Keycloak |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | open-source |
| Platforms | Cloud/Web | Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API |
| Category | Cloud | Developer Tools |
| Founded | 2021 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Deno Deploy
- Edge Functions
- Deno KV
- Automatic HTTPS
- Global Distribution
- Zero Config Deploy
- Git Integration
- Instant Rollbacks
- Web Standard APIs
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that Deno Deploy does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Deno Deploy
- API endpointsnot Keycloak
- Edge functionsnot Keycloak
- Static sitesnot Keycloak
- Real-time appsnot Keycloak
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Deno Deploy
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Deno Deploy
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Deno Deploy
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Deno Deploy
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Deno Deploy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Deno Deploy
- Smaller ecosystem compared to AWS Lambda with fewer third-party integrations
- Less mature than established serverless platforms; newer company and platform
- 1GB deployment size limit may restrict larger applications
- 512MB memory limit lower than some competitors for memory-intensive workloads
- Smaller user base and community compared to Lambda or Netlify
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Pricing, plan by plan
Deno Deploy
Free- FreeFree
- 1M requests/month
- 100GB outbound bandwidth
- 50ms CPU time per request
- Pro$20/month
- Unlimited requests
- 5GB KV storage
- Priority support
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Deno Deploy if
- You need edge functions.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud/Web.
- You also want deno kv.
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Questions people ask
- Is Deno Deploy or Keycloak better?
- Neither clearly leads. Deno Deploy starts at Free and Keycloak at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Deno Deploy or Keycloak?
- Deno Deploy starts at Free and Keycloak at Free.
- Does Deno Deploy or Keycloak run on more platforms?
- Deno Deploy runs on Cloud/Web. Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
- Can I use Deno Deploy for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Deno Deploy best used for?
- Deno Deploy is most often used for api endpoints, edge functions, static sites, real-time apps. Of those, api endpoints and edge functions are not what Keycloak is typically brought in for.
- What can Deno Deploy do that Keycloak cannot?
- Deno Deploy covers Edge Functions, Deno KV, Automatic HTTPS, Global Distribution.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Deno Deploy: What does Deno Deploy's free tier include?
Deno Deploy free tier includes 1 million requests per month, 100 GB of outbound bandwidth, 50 milliseconds of CPU time per request, 50 custom domains, 1 GiB of KV storage, and up to 5 team members.
SourceKeycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceDeno Deploy: What are Deno Deploy's Pro plan features and pricing?
Deno Deploy Pro costs $20/month and removes request limits, increases KV storage to 5GB, and includes priority support. Additional storage beyond 5GB costs $0.75/GiB.
SourceKeycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceDeno Deploy: What are the deployment size and memory limits for Deno Deploy?
The total size of all files within a deployment (source files and static files) should not exceed 1 gigabyte. Applications have a maximum memory allocation of 512MB.
SourceKeycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceDeno Deploy: Does Deno Deploy support TypeScript natively?
Yes. Deno Deploy runs TypeScript natively with zero-configuration TypeScript support. Code can be written in TypeScript or JavaScript and runs on the same V8 engine.
SourceDeno Deploy: What security features does Deno Deploy provide?
Deno Deploy features an opt-in permission system to mitigate supply chain attacks. Permissions can be explicitly granted for file, network, and environment access, running code securely by default.
SourceRelated pages
More on Deno Deploy
Other head to heads
- Deno Deploy vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Deno Deploy vs Upstash
- Deno Deploy vs Cerebrium
- Deno Deploy vs Beam Cloud
- Deno Deploy vs Serverless Framework
- Deno Deploy vs Koyeb
- Deno Deploy vs Neon
- Deno Deploy vs Pulumi
- Deno Deploy vs Render
- Deno Deploy vs Fly.io
- Deno Deploy vs Fireworks AI
- Deno Deploy vs Fastly
- Deno Deploy vs Oracle Cloud
- Deno Deploy vs Orca Security
- Deno Deploy vs Packer
- Deno Deploy vs Porter
- Deno Deploy vs Rook
- Deno Deploy vs Penpot
- Deno Deploy vs Soketi
- Deno Deploy vs Ansible
- Deno Deploy vs Atlantis
- Deno Deploy vs Vite
- Deno Deploy vs Depot
- Deno Deploy vs Pants Build
- Deno Deploy vs Buildkite
- Deno Deploy vs Coder
- Deno Deploy vs Jitsu
- Deno Deploy vs Bitbucket
- Deno Deploy vs Sweep
- Deno Deploy vs Azure DevOps
- Deno Deploy vs Backstage
- Deno Deploy vs Claude Code
- Deno Deploy vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Deno Deploy vs Cody
- Keycloak vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Keycloak vs Upstash
- Keycloak vs Cerebrium
- Keycloak vs Beam Cloud
- Keycloak vs Serverless Framework
- Keycloak vs Koyeb
- Keycloak vs Neon
- Keycloak vs Pulumi
- Keycloak vs Render
- Keycloak vs Fly.io
- Keycloak vs Fireworks AI
- Keycloak vs Fastly
- Keycloak vs Oracle Cloud
- Keycloak vs Orca Security
- Keycloak vs Packer
- Keycloak vs Porter
- Keycloak vs Rook
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Soketi
- Keycloak vs Ansible
- Keycloak vs Atlantis
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Depot
- Keycloak vs Pants Build
- Keycloak vs Buildkite
- Keycloak vs Coder
- Keycloak vs Jitsu
- Keycloak vs Bitbucket
- Keycloak vs Sweep
- Keycloak vs Azure DevOps
- Keycloak vs Backstage
- Keycloak vs Claude Code
- Keycloak vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Keycloak vs Cody

