Developer Tools · head to head
Keycloak vs Neon

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain; Neon compute pricing at $0.106-$0.222/CU-hour means costs scale directly with workload, unlike fixed-price alternatives
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Keycloak and Neon actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that Neon does not also cover.
Only in Neon
- Serverless PostgreSQL
- Database Branching
- Autoscaling
- Bottomless Storage
- Point-in-time Recovery
- Connection Pooling
- Read Replicas
- Instant Cloning
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Neon
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Neon
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Neon
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Neon
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Neon
Neon
- Serverless applicationsnot Keycloak
- Development databasesnot Keycloak
- Preview environmentsnot Keycloak
- Testingnot Keycloak
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Neon
- Compute pricing at $0.106-$0.222/CU-hour means costs scale directly with workload, unlike fixed-price alternatives
- Separation of compute and storage may add complexity to cost prediction compared to all-in-one plans
Pricing, plan by plan
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Neon
Free- FreeFree
- 100 CU-hours/month
- 0.5 GB storage
- 1 project
- Launch$15/month
- Pay-as-you-go compute
- $0.35/GB storage
- Multiple projects
- Scale$31/month
- Higher compute rates
- 99.95% SLA
- HIPAA compliance
Which should you pick?
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Choose Neon if
- You need serverless postgresql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud.
- You also want database branching.
Questions people ask
- Is Keycloak or Neon better?
- Neither clearly leads. Keycloak starts at Free and Neon at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Keycloak or Neon?
- Keycloak starts at Free and Neon at Free.
- Does Keycloak or Neon run on more platforms?
- Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API. Neon runs on Cloud.
- Can I use Keycloak for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Keycloak best used for?
- Keycloak is most often used for organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency, companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication, open-source projects and communities requiring free iam without licensing costs, enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisation. Of those, organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency and companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication are not what Neon is typically brought in for.
- What can Keycloak do that Neon cannot?
- Neon covers Serverless PostgreSQL, Database Branching, Autoscaling, Bottomless Storage.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Keycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceNeon: What is Neon and what makes it different?
Neon is a serverless PostgreSQL database that separates compute and storage, enabling automatic scaling and instant database branching. After acquisition by Databricks in May 2025, pricing has been significantly reduced.
SourceKeycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceNeon: Does Neon offer a free tier?
Yes, Neon's free tier includes 100 compute units per month and 0.5 GB of storage. This is suitable for development and small projects.
SourceKeycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceNeon: What are the paid plans and pricing for Neon?
Neon offers consumption-based pricing on Launch ($0.106/CU-hour, approximately $15/month) and Scale ($0.222/CU-hour, approximately $31/month) plans with separate storage billing at $0.35/GB-month. No monthly minimum required.
SourceNeon: What features does Neon provide?
Neon includes git-like branching for database copies, point-in-time recovery, data anonymization for testing, managed authentication, serverless functions, and object storage that branches with projects.
SourceNeon: What compliance and reliability guarantees does Neon provide?
Neon's Scale tier offers 99.95% uptime SLA, HIPAA compliance, SOC2 certification, and private networking via PrivateLink at no extra cost.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Soketi
- Keycloak vs Ansible
- Keycloak vs Atlantis
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Depot
- Keycloak vs Pants Build
- Keycloak vs Buildkite
- Keycloak vs Coder
- Keycloak vs Jitsu
- Keycloak vs Bitbucket
- Keycloak vs Sweep
- Keycloak vs Azure DevOps
- Keycloak vs Backstage
- Keycloak vs Claude Code
- Keycloak vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Keycloak vs Cody
- Keycloak vs Upstash
- Keycloak vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Keycloak vs DigitalOcean
- Keycloak vs Render
- Keycloak vs Oracle Cloud
- Keycloak vs Fly.io
- Keycloak vs Railway
- Keycloak vs Scaleway
- Keycloak vs Proxmox VE
- Keycloak vs Vultr
- Keycloak vs Tencent Cloud
- Keycloak vs Lambda
- Keycloak vs Linode
- Keycloak vs Longhorn
- Keycloak vs Northflank
- Keycloak vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Keycloak vs minikube
- Keycloak vs OpenTelemetry
- Neon vs Penpot
- Neon vs Soketi
- Neon vs Ansible
- Neon vs Atlantis
- Neon vs Vite
- Neon vs Depot
- Neon vs Pants Build
- Neon vs Buildkite
- Neon vs Coder
- Neon vs Jitsu
- Neon vs Bitbucket
- Neon vs Sweep
- Neon vs Azure DevOps
- Neon vs Backstage
- Neon vs Claude Code
- Neon vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Neon vs Cody
- Neon vs Upstash
- Neon vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Neon vs DigitalOcean
- Neon vs Render
- Neon vs Oracle Cloud
- Neon vs Fly.io
- Neon vs Railway
- Neon vs Scaleway
- Neon vs Proxmox VE
- Neon vs Vultr
- Neon vs Tencent Cloud
- Neon vs Lambda
- Neon vs Linode
- Neon vs Longhorn
- Neon vs Northflank
- Neon vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Neon vs minikube
- Neon vs OpenTelemetry

