Software · head to head
Datadog Logs vs Kibana

Datadog Logs
Software
Log Management and Analytics
- From
- $0.1/per GB ingested per month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Kibana has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Datadog Logs complex, multi-tiered pricing model based on ingestion, indexing, and storage; can become expensive at scale; Kibana requires Elasticsearch; it is a front end for data held there rather than a standalone analytics tool
- They diverge on capability: Datadog Logs covers Log ingestion, Kibana covers Data visualization.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Datadog Logs and Kibana actually diverge.
| Attribute | Datadog Logs | Kibana |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $0.1/per GB ingested per month | Free |
| Pricing model | usage-based | open-source |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Cloud (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud) | Web, Api |
| Founded | 2010 | 2011 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Datadog Logs
- Log ingestion
- Full-text search
- Custom dashboards
- Log-based metrics
Only in Kibana
- Data visualization
- Dashboard creation
- Log discovery
- Alerting
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Datadog Logs
- Centralised log aggregation and analysisnot Kibana
- Multi-source log correlation with metrics and tracesnot Kibana
- Root cause analysis and troubleshootingnot Kibana
- Security monitoring and threat detectionnot Kibana
Kibana
- Querying and visualising data held in Elasticsearchnot Datadog Logs
- Dashboards over log and metric datanot Datadog Logs
- Anomaly detection with machine learning jobsnot Datadog Logs
- Geospatial analysis on indexed location datanot Datadog Logs
- Alerting on query thresholdsnot Datadog Logs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Datadog Logs
- Complex, multi-tiered pricing model based on ingestion, indexing, and storage; can become expensive at scale
- Ingestion pricing of $0.10/GB can accumulate rapidly for high-volume logging environments
Kibana
- Requires Elasticsearch; it is a front end for data held there rather than a standalone analytics tool
- Self-managed means running and scaling the Elastic stack yourself
- Cost is not Kibana's own; it follows whichever Elastic deployment sits underneath
Pricing, plan by plan
Datadog Logs
$0.1/per GB ingested per monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Datadog Logs review.
Kibana
Free- FreeFree
- Data visualization
- Dashboard creation
- Log discovery
Which should you pick?
Choose Datadog Logs if
- You need log ingestion.
- You work on Cloud (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud).
- You also want full-text search.
Choose Kibana if
- You need data visualization.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want dashboard creation.
Questions people ask
- Is Datadog Logs or Kibana better?
- Neither clearly leads. Datadog Logs starts at $0.1/per GB ingested per month and Kibana at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Datadog Logs or Kibana?
- Kibana has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $0.1/per GB ingested per month for Datadog Logs and Free for Kibana.
- Does Datadog Logs or Kibana run on more platforms?
- Datadog Logs runs on Cloud (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud). Kibana runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Kibana for free?
- Yes. Kibana has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Datadog Logs starts at $0.1/per GB ingested per month.
- What is Datadog Logs best used for?
- Datadog Logs is most often used for centralised log aggregation and analysis, multi-source log correlation with metrics and traces, root cause analysis and troubleshooting, security monitoring and threat detection. Of those, centralised log aggregation and analysis and multi-source log correlation with metrics and traces are not what Kibana is typically brought in for.
- What can Datadog Logs do that Kibana cannot?
- Datadog Logs covers Log ingestion, Full-text search, Custom dashboards, Log-based metrics. Kibana covers Data visualization, Dashboard creation, Log discovery, Alerting. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Related pages
More on Datadog Logs
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Datadog Logs vs Elastic Stack
- Datadog Logs vs New Relic
- Datadog Logs vs Coralogix
- Datadog Logs vs Grafana Loki
- Datadog Logs vs CloudWatch
- Datadog Logs vs Dynatrace
- Datadog Logs vs InfluxDB
- Datadog Logs vs Airbrake
- Datadog Logs vs AppDynamics
- Datadog Logs vs Axiom
- Datadog Logs vs Azure Monitor
- Datadog Logs vs Better Stack
- Datadog Logs vs Bugsnag
- Datadog Logs vs Dynatrace Logs
- Datadog Logs vs Elastic
- Datadog Logs vs Elastic APM
- Datadog Logs vs Elasticsearch Service
- Datadog Logs vs ELK Stack
- Kibana vs Elastic Stack
- Kibana vs New Relic
- Kibana vs Coralogix
- Kibana vs Grafana Loki
- Kibana vs CloudWatch
- Kibana vs Dynatrace
- Kibana vs InfluxDB
- Kibana vs Airbrake
- Kibana vs AppDynamics
- Kibana vs Axiom
- Kibana vs Azure Monitor
- Kibana vs Better Stack
- Kibana vs Bugsnag
- Kibana vs Dynatrace Logs
- Kibana vs Elastic
- Kibana vs Elastic APM
- Kibana vs Elasticsearch Service
- Kibana vs ELK Stack

