Logging · head to head
Grafana Loki vs Kibana
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Grafana Loki grafana Cloud Logs Pro plan includes only 30-day retention; retention beyond 30 days requires Enterprise plan with minimum $25,000 annual commitment; Kibana requires Elasticsearch; it is a front end for data held there rather than a standalone analytics tool
- They diverge on capability: Grafana Loki covers Log aggregation, Kibana covers Data visualization.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Grafana Loki and Kibana actually diverge.
| Attribute | Grafana Loki | Kibana |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | open-source |
| Platforms | Self-hosted (open source), Managed (Grafana Cloud Logs), Enterprise (self-managed with support) | Web, Api |
| Founded | 2014 | 2011 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logging).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Grafana Loki
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- LogQL language
- Cost-effective
Only in Kibana
- Data visualization
- Dashboard creation
- Log discovery
- Alerting
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Grafana Loki
- Cost-sensitive organisations deploying Kubernetes and Prometheus ecosystemsnot Kibana
- Teams needing index-free log aggregation for high-volume environmentsnot Kibana
Kibana
- Querying and visualising data held in Elasticsearchnot Grafana Loki
- Dashboards over log and metric datanot Grafana Loki
- Anomaly detection with machine learning jobsnot Grafana Loki
- Geospatial analysis on indexed location datanot Grafana Loki
- Alerting on query thresholdsnot Grafana Loki
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Grafana Loki
- Grafana Cloud Logs Pro plan includes only 30-day retention; retention beyond 30 days requires Enterprise plan with minimum $25,000 annual commitment
- Open-source version requires self-hosting all infrastructure including storage and scaling
Kibana
- Requires Elasticsearch; it is a front end for data held there rather than a standalone analytics tool
- Self-managed means running and scaling the Elastic stack yourself
- Cost is not Kibana's own; it follows whichever Elastic deployment sits underneath
Pricing, plan by plan
Grafana Loki
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Grafana Loki review.
Kibana
Free- FreeFree
- Data visualization
- Dashboard creation
- Log discovery
Which should you pick?
Choose Grafana Loki if
- You need log aggregation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted (open source), Managed (Grafana Cloud Logs), Enterprise (self-managed with support).
- You also want label-based indexing.
Choose Kibana if
- You need data visualization.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want dashboard creation.
Questions people ask
- Is Grafana Loki or Kibana better?
- Neither clearly leads. Grafana Loki starts at Free and Kibana at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Grafana Loki or Kibana?
- Grafana Loki starts at Free and Kibana at Free.
- Does Grafana Loki or Kibana run on more platforms?
- Grafana Loki runs on Self-hosted (open source), Managed (Grafana Cloud Logs), Enterprise (self-managed with support). Kibana runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Grafana Loki for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Grafana Loki best used for?
- Grafana Loki is most often used for cost-sensitive organisations deploying kubernetes and prometheus ecosystems, teams needing index-free log aggregation for high-volume environments. Of those, cost-sensitive organisations deploying kubernetes and prometheus ecosystems and teams needing index-free log aggregation for high-volume environments are not what Kibana is typically brought in for.
- What can Grafana Loki do that Kibana cannot?
- Grafana Loki covers Log aggregation, Label-based indexing, LogQL language, Cost-effective. Kibana covers Data visualization, Dashboard creation, Log discovery, Alerting. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Grafana Loki: Is there a free tier for Grafana Cloud?
Yes, Grafana Cloud has a Free Forever plan at no cost with no registration required. The free tier is suitable for personal projects and early-stage startups.
SourceKibana: Is Kibana available for free?
Kibana is offered with a free trial across all deployment models (Elastic Cloud Serverless, Hosted, and self-managed). Kibana is a component of the Elastic product suite and is not priced separately.
SourceGrafana Loki: How long is data retained in Grafana's free plan?
The free tier retains metrics, logs, traces, and profiles for 14 days.
SourceKibana: How is Kibana priced?
Kibana pricing is bundled with Elasticsearch or other Elastic products. Pricing varies by deployment model: Elastic Cloud Serverless uses usage-based pricing, Hosted uses resource-based pricing, and self-managed is free to download.
SourceGrafana Loki: What is the minimum cost for Grafana Enterprise?
Grafana Enterprise has a minimum annual commitment of 25,000 dollars.
SourceGrafana Loki: Do I need a credit card to use Grafana's free tier?
No, Grafana Cloud's Free Forever plan requires no credit card to get started.
SourceGrafana Loki: How is Grafana Cloud billed?
Grafana Cloud Pro starts at 19 dollars per month with usage-based charges on top. Billing is monthly based on your consumption. Grafana offers automatic volume discounts based on your spending.
SourceRelated pages
More on Grafana Loki
Other head to heads
- Grafana Loki vs Elastic Stack
- Grafana Loki vs New Relic
- Grafana Loki vs Datadog Logs
- Grafana Loki vs Coralogix
- Grafana Loki vs Axiom
- Grafana Loki vs Logz.io
- Grafana Loki vs InfluxDB
- Grafana Loki vs Better Stack
- Grafana Loki vs Graylog
- Grafana Loki vs Papertrail
- Grafana Loki vs Raygun
- Grafana Loki vs Retrace
- Grafana Loki vs Rollbar
- Grafana Loki vs Sematext
- Grafana Loki vs Elastic APM
- Grafana Loki vs New Relic Logs
- Grafana Loki vs ELK Stack
- Grafana Loki vs Filebeat
- Grafana Loki vs Elastic
- Grafana Loki vs Fluentd
- Grafana Loki vs Traceloop
- Grafana Loki vs incident.io
- Grafana Loki vs Splunk Cloud
- Grafana Loki vs Stackdriver
- Grafana Loki vs Telegraf
- Grafana Loki vs Splunk Enterprise
- Kibana vs Elastic Stack
- Kibana vs New Relic
- Kibana vs Datadog Logs
- Kibana vs Coralogix
- Kibana vs Axiom
- Kibana vs Logz.io
- Kibana vs InfluxDB
- Kibana vs Better Stack
- Kibana vs Graylog
- Kibana vs Papertrail
- Kibana vs Raygun
- Kibana vs Retrace
- Kibana vs Rollbar
- Kibana vs Sematext
- Kibana vs Elastic APM
- Kibana vs New Relic Logs
- Kibana vs ELK Stack
- Kibana vs Filebeat
- Kibana vs Elastic
- Kibana vs Fluentd
- Kibana vs Traceloop
- Kibana vs incident.io
- Kibana vs Splunk Cloud
- Kibana vs Stackdriver
- Kibana vs Telegraf
- Kibana vs Splunk Enterprise


