Developer Tools · head to head
Dagger vs Strikingly

Dagger
Developer Tools
Programmable CI/CD engine that runs your pipeline as containers on any runner
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Strikingly
Web Development
One-page website builder for small businesses and creators
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Dagger dagger is not a CI provider, so you keep paying for GitHub Actions or GitLab runners underneath it; the Dagger Cloud subscription is an addition to your CI bill, not a replacement for it.; Strikingly strikingly is optimized for single-page sites and is not well suited to building large, multi-section websites.
- They diverge on capability: Dagger covers Pipelines as code, Strikingly covers Drag-and-drop editor.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Dagger and Strikingly actually diverge.
| Attribute | Dagger | Strikingly |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per month per team for Dagger Cloud | freemium |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted | web |
| Category | Developer Tools | Web Development |
| Founded | Unknown | 2012 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Dagger
- Pipelines as code
- Local and CI parity
- Content-addressed caching
- Dagger Functions and modules
- CI-provider agnostic
- Dagger Cloud traces
- GitHub Checks integration
- Container-native execution
Only in Strikingly
- Drag-and-drop editor
- Simple Store
- Blogging
- Forms and live chat
- Traffic analytics
- Social feed integration
- HTTPS/SSL
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Dagger
- A platform team maintaining near-identical build YAML across forty repositories that wants one versioned module every repository calls insteadnot Strikingly
- An engineering organisation migrating off a CI provider that does not want to rewrite every pipeline as part of the migrationnot Strikingly
- A team whose engineers waste hours pushing commits to debug CI-only failures and needs to reproduce the exact run locallynot Strikingly
- A monorepo where most commits touch a small subset of services and cache-accurate step skipping cuts build minutes materiallynot Strikingly
Strikingly
- Personal portfolio or resume sitenot Dagger
- Single-product or small online storenot Dagger
- Event or landing pagenot Dagger
- Small business brochure sitenot Dagger
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Dagger
- Dagger is not a CI provider, so you keep paying for GitHub Actions or GitLab runners underneath it; the Dagger Cloud subscription is an addition to your CI bill, not a replacement for it.
- Writing pipelines in Go or TypeScript raises the barrier to entry: a release engineer who could edit a YAML step now needs to read code, and the people who can fix a broken build shrink to those comfortable with the SDK.
- The engine runs as a container on the runner and needs a persistent cache volume to deliver its main benefit, so ephemeral CI runners give you correctness without the speed, and provisioning durable cache storage is extra platform work.
- The Team plan caps at ten users and ten million events per month; an organisation of any size crosses that quickly and moves to Enterprise pricing that is not published, so cost at scale is unknowable up front.
- The module ecosystem is young and thinly maintained relative to the marketplace of a mature CI provider, so integrations that exist as a one-line Action often have to be written yourself as a Dagger function.
Strikingly
- Strikingly is optimized for single-page sites and is not well suited to building large, multi-section websites.
- Transaction fees of 2-5% apply to store sales on lower-tier plans in addition to payment processor fees.
- Design customization is limited compared to code-based site builders, since sites are built from fixed templates.
- The free plan does not support a custom domain, limiting its use for professional or commercial sites.
Pricing, plan by plan
Dagger
Free- IndividualFree
- One user
- One million events per month
- Workflow logs and function call traces
- Team$50/month
- Up to ten users
- Ten million events per month
- Module insights and module catalogue
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom user and event limits
- SSO
- Managed single-tenant deployment
Strikingly
Free- Limited$8/month
- 2 sites
- 1 GB storage per site
- Up to 5 pages
- Pro$16/month
- 3 sites
- 20 GB storage per site
- Up to 100 pages
- VIP$49/month
- 5 sites
- 100 GB storage per site
- Up to 500 products
Which should you pick?
Choose Dagger if
- You need pipelines as code.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted.
- You also want local and ci parity.
Choose Strikingly if
- You need drag-and-drop editor.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web.
- You also want simple store.
Questions people ask
- Is Dagger or Strikingly better?
- Neither clearly leads. Dagger starts at Free and Strikingly at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Dagger or Strikingly?
- Dagger starts at Free and Strikingly at Free.
- Does Dagger or Strikingly run on more platforms?
- Dagger runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted. Strikingly runs on web.
- Can I use Dagger for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Dagger best used for?
- Dagger is most often used for a platform team maintaining near-identical build yaml across forty repositories that wants one versioned module every repository calls instead, an engineering organisation migrating off a ci provider that does not want to rewrite every pipeline as part of the migration, a team whose engineers waste hours pushing commits to debug ci-only failures and needs to reproduce the exact run locally, a monorepo where most commits touch a small subset of services and cache-accurate step skipping cuts build minutes materially. Of those, a platform team maintaining near-identical build yaml across forty repositories that wants one versioned module every repository calls instead and an engineering organisation migrating off a ci provider that does not want to rewrite every pipeline as part of the migration are not what Strikingly is typically brought in for.
- What can Dagger do that Strikingly cannot?
- Dagger covers Pipelines as code, Local and CI parity, Content-addressed caching, Dagger Functions and modules. Strikingly covers Drag-and-drop editor, Simple Store, Blogging, Forms and live chat.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Dagger: Does Dagger replace GitHub Actions?
No. Dagger runs inside GitHub Actions or any other CI. It replaces the YAML that describes your pipeline steps, not the trigger and runner layer.
Strikingly: Does Strikingly have a free plan?
Strikingly offers a free tier for getting started, with paid plans beginning at $8/month (billed yearly) adding a custom domain, more storage, and lower transaction fees on store sales.
SourceDagger: Is the engine open source?
Yes, the Dagger engine and SDKs are open source and free. Dagger Cloud, the observability product, is what costs money.
Strikingly: Does Strikingly charge transaction fees on store sales?
Yes. The Limited plan charges a 5% transaction fee, the Pro plan charges 2%, and the VIP plan removes the transaction fee entirely, in addition to any payment processor fees.
SourceDagger: What is an event in the pricing?
Dagger Cloud meters pipeline telemetry events. One million per month is free; the Team plan at 50 USD per month allows ten million.
Strikingly: What payment methods can I use to sell products?
Strikingly's built-in Simple Store supports accepting payments through PayPal and Stripe.
SourceDagger: Can I run the same pipeline on my laptop?
Yes, that is the main reason teams adopt it. The dagger CLI executes the identical graph locally, so CI-only failures become reproducible.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Dagger vs Earthly
- Dagger vs Buildkite
- Dagger vs Tilt
- Dagger vs Nixpacks
- Dagger vs Depot
- Dagger vs Blacksmith
- Dagger vs WarpBuild
- Dagger vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Dagger vs Nx Cloud
- Dagger vs Namespace
- Dagger vs Pants Build
- Dagger vs Jitsu
- Dagger vs GoLand
- Dagger vs Hookdeck
- Dagger vs JFrog Artifactory
- Dagger vs Nix
- Dagger vs Wix Studio
- Dagger vs Carrd
- Dagger vs Astro
- Dagger vs Bootstrap
- Dagger vs Qwik
- Dagger vs Flask
- Dagger vs Docusaurus
- Dagger vs SolidStart
- Dagger vs Bolt.new
- Dagger vs Drupal
- Dagger vs Lit
- Dagger vs Apache HTTP Server
- Dagger vs .NET
- Dagger vs Express.js
- Dagger vs FastAPI
- Dagger vs Wix
- Strikingly vs Earthly
- Strikingly vs Buildkite
- Strikingly vs Tilt
- Strikingly vs Nixpacks
- Strikingly vs Depot
- Strikingly vs Blacksmith
- Strikingly vs WarpBuild
- Strikingly vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Strikingly vs Nx Cloud
- Strikingly vs Namespace
- Strikingly vs Pants Build
- Strikingly vs Jitsu
- Strikingly vs GoLand
- Strikingly vs Hookdeck
- Strikingly vs JFrog Artifactory
- Strikingly vs Nix
- Strikingly vs Wix Studio
- Strikingly vs Carrd
- Strikingly vs Astro
- Strikingly vs Bootstrap
- Strikingly vs Qwik
- Strikingly vs Flask
- Strikingly vs Docusaurus
- Strikingly vs SolidStart
- Strikingly vs Bolt.new
- Strikingly vs Drupal
- Strikingly vs Lit
- Strikingly vs Apache HTTP Server
- Strikingly vs .NET
- Strikingly vs Express.js
- Strikingly vs FastAPI
- Strikingly vs Wix
