Software · head to head
Cursor vs Together AI
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cursor cannot work fully offline; AI features require internet connection; Together AI fine tuning carries a minimum charge of $4.00 per job regardless of dataset size
- They diverge on capability: Cursor covers AI code completion, Together AI covers Open-source models.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cursor and Together AI actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cursor | Together AI |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | usage-based |
| Platforms | Windows, Macos, Linux | Api, Cloud |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown), founded (2022).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cursor
- AI code completion
- Natural language editing
- Codebase chat
- Multi-file editing
- Code generation
- Bug fixing assistance
- Refactoring suggestions
- AI pair programming
Only in Together AI
- Open-source models
- Fine-tuning
- Fast inference
- Embeddings
- REST API
- Python SDK
- OpenAI compatible
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cursor
- AI-assisted codingnot Together AI
- Code generationnot Together AI
- Bug fixingnot Together AI
- Refactoringnot Together AI
- Learning new codebasesnot Together AI
- Rapid prototypingnot Together AI
Together AI
- Serverless inference against open source chat, vision, embedding, image and video modelsnot Cursor
- Renting dedicated single tenant H100, H200 or B200 GPU clusters by the hournot Cursor
- Fine tuning open weight models on a per token basisnot Cursor
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cursor
- Cannot work fully offline; AI features require internet connection
- Local models require requests to route through Cursor's backend, not true localhost support
- Free tier capped at 2,000 completions per month
- Codebase indexing uploads code chunks to compute embeddings, with file caching handled server-side
Together AI
- Fine tuning carries a minimum charge of $4.00 per job regardless of dataset size
- Reserved GPU commitments beyond 180 days are priced by contacting sales with no published rate
- Volume and enterprise discounts are quote only with no published threshold
- Reserved dedicated inference pricing is contact sales while only on demand rates of $5.49 to $8.99 per GPU hour are published
Pricing, plan by plan
Cursor
Free- HobbyFree
- 2,000 completions/month
- 50 slow premium requests
- Basic autocomplete
- Pro$20/month
- Unlimited completions
- 500 fast premium requests
- Composer multi-file editor
- Pro+$60/month
- 3x Pro limits on Agent requests
- Priority feature access
- Teams Standard$40/user/month
- All Individual Pro features
- Centralized billing
- SAML/OIDC SSO
Together AI
Free- FreeFree
- $5 credits
- API access
- Pay-per-use$0.2/per-million-tokens
- All models
- Fine-tuning
Which should you pick?
Choose Cursor if
- You need ai code completion.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Macos, Linux.
- You also want natural language editing.
Choose Together AI if
- You need open-source models.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Api, Cloud.
- You also want fine-tuning.
Questions people ask
- Is Cursor or Together AI better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cursor starts at Free and Together AI at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cursor or Together AI?
- Cursor starts at Free and Together AI at Free.
- Does Cursor or Together AI run on more platforms?
- Cursor runs on Windows, Macos, Linux. Together AI runs on Api, Cloud.
- Can I use Cursor for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cursor best used for?
- Cursor is most often used for ai-assisted coding, code generation, bug fixing, refactoring. Of those, ai-assisted coding and code generation are not what Together AI is typically brought in for.
- What can Cursor do that Together AI cannot?
- Cursor covers AI code completion, Natural language editing, Codebase chat, Multi-file editing. Together AI covers Open-source models, Fine-tuning, Fast inference, Embeddings.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cursor: What's included in Cursor's free tier and what are its limits?
The free Hobby plan provides 2,000 completions per month and 50 slow premium requests, with access to basic autocomplete features. Codebase-wide indexing and the Composer multi-file editor are not available on the free plan.
SourceCursor: Does Cursor require an internet connection to edit code?
While Cursor can open and edit files locally, its AI features including autocomplete, chat, agents, and codebase-aware reasoning require internet access to cloud-hosted models.
SourceCursor: Can I use Cursor with local models running on my machine?
Cursor can integrate with local models, but requests still route through Cursor's backend for prompt building. True localhost mode without external endpoints is not supported. The paid plan ($20+/month) is required to use local models.
SourceCursor: What privacy controls does Cursor offer?
Cursor offers Privacy Mode (enabled on paid Team plans) which prevents customer data from being used for model training, with zero data retention agreements with all AI providers. When disabled, Cursor may use codebase data to improve features.
SourceCursor: What are the differences between Pro and Pro+ plans?
Pro ($20/month) includes unlimited completions and 500 fast premium requests, while Pro+ ($60/month) provides 3x those request limits, priority feature access, and extended Agent capabilities.
SourceCursor: Does Cursor support SSO and on which plan?
SSO with SAML/OIDC is included on Teams Standard ($40/user/month) and higher plans, with full team administration and audit logs.
SourceRelated pages
More on Together AI
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Cursor vs Windsurf
- Cursor vs Zed
- Cursor vs Amp
- Cursor vs Codacy
- Cursor vs DeepSource
- Cursor vs Augment Code
- Cursor vs Drizzle ORM
- Cursor vs Flagsmith
- Cursor vs Unleash
- Cursor vs Baseten
- Cursor vs Braintrust
- Cursor vs Bun
- Cursor vs Cline
- Cursor vs Devin
- Cursor vs Factory
- Cursor vs Humanloop
- Cursor vs Langfuse
- Cursor vs LangSmith
- Cursor vs Pika
- Cursor vs Anthropic API
- Cursor vs D-ID
- Cursor vs Fathom
- Cursor vs Stable Diffusion
- Cursor vs Perplexity
- Cursor vs Arize AI
- Cursor vs Black Forest Labs
- Cursor vs Cartesia
- Cursor vs Deepgram
- Cursor vs Helicone
- Cursor vs Ideogram
- Cursor vs Jasper
- Cursor vs PromptLayer
- Cursor vs Resemble AI
- Cursor vs AI21 Labs
- Cursor vs Copy.ai
- Cursor vs HeyGen
- Together AI vs Windsurf
- Together AI vs Zed
- Together AI vs Amp
- Together AI vs Codacy
- Together AI vs DeepSource
- Together AI vs Augment Code
- Together AI vs Drizzle ORM
- Together AI vs Flagsmith
- Together AI vs Unleash
- Together AI vs Baseten
- Together AI vs Braintrust
- Together AI vs Bun
- Together AI vs Cline
- Together AI vs Devin
- Together AI vs Factory
- Together AI vs Humanloop
- Together AI vs Langfuse
- Together AI vs LangSmith
- Together AI vs Pika
- Together AI vs Anthropic API
- Together AI vs D-ID
- Together AI vs Fathom
- Together AI vs Stable Diffusion
- Together AI vs Perplexity
- Together AI vs Arize AI
- Together AI vs Black Forest Labs
- Together AI vs Cartesia
- Together AI vs Deepgram
- Together AI vs Helicone
- Together AI vs Ideogram
- Together AI vs Jasper
- Together AI vs PromptLayer
- Together AI vs Resemble AI
- Together AI vs AI21 Labs
- Together AI vs Copy.ai
- Together AI vs HeyGen


