CAD · head to head
CoreTechnologie vs SolidWorks

CoreTechnologie
CAD
CAD format conversion, validation and additive build preparation from a German independent
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

SolidWorks
Manufacturing
Parametric desktop 3D CAD from Dassault Systemes, now sold as named-user subscription on the 3DEXPERIENCE platform
- From
- $2820/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CoreTechnologie no pricing is published and the vendor sells through direct and regional channels, so there is no list price to anchor a negotiation and quotes differ by territory.; SolidWorks the desktop application is Windows only, so Mac and Linux users need a virtual machine, a Windows workstation or the separate cloud xDesign product at 2,580 USD a year.
- They diverge on capability: CoreTechnologie covers Native CAD conversion, SolidWorks covers 3D solid modeling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CoreTechnologie and SolidWorks actually diverge.
| Attribute | CoreTechnologie | SolidWorks |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $2820/year |
| Pricing model | quote | Per user per year |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux | Windows |
| Category | CAD | Manufacturing |
| Founded | Unknown | 1993 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CoreTechnologie
- Native CAD conversion
- Automatic geometry healing
- Feature recognition
- Simplification and defeaturing
- Batch and server conversion
- 3D_Analyzer
- 4D_Additive B-rep printing
Only in SolidWorks
- 3D solid modeling
- Assembly design
- Technical drawings
- Simulation
- Rendering
- PDM systems
- ERP systems
- CAM software
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CoreTechnologie
- A tier supplier that receives CATIA from one customer and NX from another and must work in SolidWorksnot SolidWorks
- A company migrating a CAD library off one platform and needing feature-recognised, editable models rather than dumb solidsnot SolidWorks
- Preparing additive builds from exact B-rep geometry where STL faceting would lose the tolerance you neednot SolidWorks
- Giving purchasing and manufacturing staff a viewer with real analysis without buying them CAD seatsnot SolidWorks
SolidWorks
- Product designnot CoreTechnologie
- Engineering analysisnot CoreTechnologie
- Manufacturing documentationnot CoreTechnologie
- Prototypingnot CoreTechnologie
- Quality controlnot CoreTechnologie
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CoreTechnologie
- No pricing is published and the vendor sells through direct and regional channels, so there is no list price to anchor a negotiation and quotes differ by territory.
- Licensing is granular by format read and write pair, so the price you were quoted covers the translations you named and adding a customer with a different CAD platform later means going back for another line item.
- It is a small independent vendor, so a buyer standardising a critical migration pipeline on it should weigh the concentration risk and check the support arrangement in their own region rather than assume global coverage.
- Feature recognition on converted geometry works well on prismatic machined parts and much less well on complex freeform surfaces, so the rebuilt-as-editable claim needs testing on your own worst parts, not on a demo model.
- 4D_Additive competes with entrenched incumbents such as Magics in industrial AM, so machine-side Build Processor support and bureau familiarity are thinner, which matters if you need your service provider to accept the output.
SolidWorks
- The desktop application is Windows only, so Mac and Linux users need a virtual machine, a Windows workstation or the separate cloud xDesign product at 2,580 USD a year.
- Perpetual licences are no longer sold through the vendor online store and come only through resellers, and a perpetual licence still needs a paid annual service contract to get upgrades and support, so buying once and paying nothing again is not really on offer.
- Named-user subscription is per person rather than floating, so an organisation where several engineers each use CAD occasionally pays full seats for part-time use unless it negotiates otherwise.
- History-based parametric modelling breaks noisily: a change high in the feature tree can cascade rebuild errors through an assembly, which is a real productivity cost compared with direct modelling tools.
- Large assemblies stress single-threaded desktop performance, and teams routinely resort to configurations, simplified representations and expensive workstations rather than the software scaling on its own.
- The Maker licence watermarks its files so they can only be opened on other Maker licences, which means hobby work cannot be carried into a commercial seat later without exporting to neutral formats and losing the feature history.
Pricing, plan by plan
CoreTechnologie
On request- 3D_Evolution$undefined/year
- Native CAD conversion across around 36 formats
- Automatic healing and feature recognition
- Simplification and defeaturing
- 3D_Analyzer$undefined/year
- Cross-format viewing and measurement
- Wall thickness, draft and collision analysis
- Model comparison
- 4D_Additive$undefined/year
- B-rep based build preparation
- Texturing, nesting and lattice structures
- Automatic part analysis for printability
SolidWorks
$2820/year- 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS Standard$2820/year
- 235 USD per month billed annually, or 846 USD per quarter
- Per named user, excluding local tax
- Part and assembly modelling and 2D drawings
- 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS Professional$3456/year
- 288 USD per month billed annually, or 1,038 USD per quarter
- Everything in Standard
- Intelligent CAD libraries of standard fasteners
- 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS Premium$4716/year
- 393 USD per month billed annually, or 1,416 USD per quarter
- Everything in Professional
- Linear static analysis for parts and assemblies
- SOLIDWORKS xDesign$2580/year
- 810 USD per quarter
- Browser-based cloud modelling, no local install
- Runs on Mac, Chromebook and tablets as well as Windows
Which should you pick?
Choose CoreTechnologie if
- You need native cad conversion.
- You work on Windows, Linux.
- You also want automatic geometry healing.
Choose SolidWorks if
- You need 3d solid modeling.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want assembly design.
Questions people ask
- Is CoreTechnologie or SolidWorks better?
- Neither clearly leads. CoreTechnologie starts at On request and SolidWorks at $2820/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CoreTechnologie or SolidWorks?
- CoreTechnologie starts at On request and SolidWorks at $2820/year.
- Does CoreTechnologie or SolidWorks run on more platforms?
- CoreTechnologie runs on Windows, Linux. SolidWorks runs on Windows.
- What is CoreTechnologie best used for?
- CoreTechnologie is most often used for a tier supplier that receives catia from one customer and nx from another and must work in solidworks, a company migrating a cad library off one platform and needing feature-recognised, editable models rather than dumb solids, preparing additive builds from exact b-rep geometry where stl faceting would lose the tolerance you need, giving purchasing and manufacturing staff a viewer with real analysis without buying them cad seats. Of those, a tier supplier that receives catia from one customer and nx from another and must work in solidworks and a company migrating a cad library off one platform and needing feature-recognised, editable models rather than dumb solids are not what SolidWorks is typically brought in for.
- What can CoreTechnologie do that SolidWorks cannot?
- CoreTechnologie covers Native CAD conversion, Automatic geometry healing, Feature recognition, Simplification and defeaturing. SolidWorks covers 3D solid modeling, Assembly design, Technical drawings, Simulation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CoreTechnologie: Is CoreTechnologie owned by a CAD vendor?
No. It is an independent German company, which is the main reason it appears in supply chains that must move data between competing CAD platforms.
SolidWorks: Can you still buy a SOLIDWORKS perpetual licence?
Not from the vendor online store, which sells only term subscriptions. Perpetual licences remain available through resellers, but they still require a paid annual subscription service contract for upgrades and support.
CoreTechnologie: Does conversion produce editable models?
3D_Evolution has feature recognition that rebuilds parametric features from solids. It is reliable on prismatic machined geometry and weaker on complex freeform surfaces, so test it on your hardest parts.
SolidWorks: How much does SOLIDWORKS cost per year?
The 3DS store lists Standard at 2,820 USD, Professional at 3,456 USD and Premium at 4,716 USD per named user per year, excluding local tax. Quarterly terms are 846, 1,038 and 1,416 USD.
CoreTechnologie: What makes 4D_Additive different from a normal slicer?
It prepares builds on exact B-rep geometry rather than converting to STL first, so tolerance and surface accuracy are not lost to faceting before printing.
SolidWorks: What is the difference between desktop SOLIDWORKS and the 3DEXPERIENCE cloud tiers?
The desktop application still does the modelling and installs locally on Windows. The 3DEXPERIENCE platform adds cloud storage, versioning, mark-up and shared review around it. SOLIDWORKS xDesign is the separate browser-native modeller at 2,580 USD a year, and it runs on Mac and Chromebook.
CoreTechnologie: Can it run unattended for large migrations?
Yes. Batch and server conversion is designed for high-volume migration and PLM pipeline use rather than desk-by-desk conversion.
SolidWorks: Is there a cheap version for hobbyists?
Yes. 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS for Makers is 48 USD a year or 15 USD a month, limited to personal use with project sales under 2,000 USD a year, and its files are watermarked for Maker licences only.
SolidWorks: Does SOLIDWORKS run on a Mac?
Not natively. Use the browser-based xDesign, or run the desktop application in a Windows virtual machine.
Related pages
More on CoreTechnologie
Other head to heads
- CoreTechnologie vs FreeCAD
- CoreTechnologie vs Siemens NX
- CoreTechnologie vs CATIA
- CoreTechnologie vs nTop
- CoreTechnologie vs ANSYS Fluent
- CoreTechnologie vs Bambu Studio
- CoreTechnologie vs COMSOL Multiphysics
- CoreTechnologie vs MicroSurvey CAD
- CoreTechnologie vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- CoreTechnologie vs Bentley MicroStation
- CoreTechnologie vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- CoreTechnologie vs BricsCAD
- CoreTechnologie vs Arnold
- CoreTechnologie vs Carlson Software
- CoreTechnologie vs Corona Renderer
- CoreTechnologie vs Inventor
- CoreTechnologie vs Mudbox
- CoreTechnologie vs Fusion 360
- CoreTechnologie vs Fulcrum
- CoreTechnologie vs Tulip
- CoreTechnologie vs MachineMetrics
- CoreTechnologie vs Fictiv
- CoreTechnologie vs Aras Innovator
- CoreTechnologie vs AVEVA System Platform
- CoreTechnologie vs Materialise Magics
- CoreTechnologie vs Seeq
- CoreTechnologie vs Propel
- CoreTechnologie vs PTC Windchill
- CoreTechnologie vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- CoreTechnologie vs Flow Software
- CoreTechnologie vs Formlabs PreForm
- CoreTechnologie vs GENESIS Version 11
- CoreTechnologie vs GrabCAD Print
- CoreTechnologie vs Guidewheel
- CoreTechnologie vs JobBOSS²
- SolidWorks vs FreeCAD
- SolidWorks vs Siemens NX
- SolidWorks vs CATIA
- SolidWorks vs nTop
- SolidWorks vs ANSYS Fluent
- SolidWorks vs Bambu Studio
- SolidWorks vs COMSOL Multiphysics
- SolidWorks vs MicroSurvey CAD
- SolidWorks vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- SolidWorks vs Bentley MicroStation
- SolidWorks vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- SolidWorks vs BricsCAD
- SolidWorks vs Arnold
- SolidWorks vs Carlson Software
- SolidWorks vs Corona Renderer
- SolidWorks vs Inventor
- SolidWorks vs Mudbox
- SolidWorks vs Fusion 360
- SolidWorks vs Fulcrum
- SolidWorks vs Tulip
- SolidWorks vs MachineMetrics
- SolidWorks vs Fictiv
- SolidWorks vs Aras Innovator
- SolidWorks vs AVEVA System Platform
- SolidWorks vs Materialise Magics
- SolidWorks vs Seeq
- SolidWorks vs Propel
- SolidWorks vs PTC Windchill
- SolidWorks vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- SolidWorks vs Flow Software
- SolidWorks vs Formlabs PreForm
- SolidWorks vs GENESIS Version 11
- SolidWorks vs GrabCAD Print
- SolidWorks vs Guidewheel
- SolidWorks vs JobBOSS²
