APIs · head to head
Convoy vs Firefly III

Convoy
APIs
Open source webhooks gateway you self-host, handling both sending and receiving
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Firefly III
Personal Finance
Free, open source, self-hosted personal finance manager with double-entry style accounting
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Convoy the default deployment is self-hosted, so you operate Convoy plus Postgres and Redis and carry the on-call burden for the system that delivers your customers' events.; Firefly III there is no official managed hosting, so a non-technical user has no easy on-ramp the way Actual Budget offers with its paid hosted sync.
- They diverge on capability: Convoy covers Inbound and outbound, Firefly III covers Double-entry style ledger.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Convoy and Firefly III actually diverge.
| Attribute | Convoy | Firefly III |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per month, flat rate regardless of volume | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud | Web, Linux, Docker |
| Category | APIs | Personal Finance |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Convoy
- Inbound and outbound
- Broker-driven ingestion
- Payload transformation
- Portal links
- Circuit breaking
- Retry policies
- OpenTelemetry export
- Role-based access control
Only in Firefly III
- Double-entry style ledger
- Multi-currency accounts
- Bill and subscription tracking
- Rule engine
- Reports and charts
- API access
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Convoy
- A fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party SaaS for compliance reasonsnot Firefly III
- A high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licencenot Firefly III
- A team that also receives webhooks from many providers and wants ingestion, verification and deduplication in the same gatewaynot Firefly III
- An engineering group that wants webhook delivery driven directly from an existing Kafka or SQS topicnot Firefly III
Firefly III
- A self-hoster already running a home server or NAS who wants their financial ledger on the same infrastructurenot Convoy
- Someone who wants double-entry style accuracy rather than simple envelope budgetingnot Convoy
- A privacy-focused user who refuses to put financial data on any third-party server, hosted or otherwisenot Convoy
- A developer who wants API access to build custom bank import scripts for accounts with no standard connectornot Convoy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Convoy
- The default deployment is self-hosted, so you operate Convoy plus Postgres and Redis and carry the on-call burden for the system that delivers your customers' events.
- Frain Technologies is a small startup, and putting customer-facing delivery infrastructure on it means accepting real vendor continuity risk on a component that is hard to swap out quickly.
- The premium tier at a flat 999 US dollars a month is poor value below substantial volume, while the community edition omits the portal, transformations and RBAC that most production deployments end up wanting.
- The hosted cloud trial is capped at one project and 100 events a day, which is too small to properly evaluate the service before committing.
- Documentation and the third-party ecosystem are thinner than the established webhook services, so unusual configurations often mean reading the Go source.
Firefly III
- There is no official managed hosting, so a non-technical user has no easy on-ramp the way Actual Budget offers with its paid hosted sync.
- The double-entry-influenced model is less intuitive for newcomers than simple envelope budgeting, and the learning curve is real.
- Automatic bank sync depends on the community-run importer and third-party connectors, and coverage and reliability vary a lot by bank and country.
- Mobile access is via a web interface rather than a polished native app, which is a step behind Actual Budget or Lunch Money on phones.
- Because there is no company behind it, security patching and feature development depend entirely on volunteer maintainer time.
Pricing, plan by plan
Convoy
Free- CommunityFree
- Self-hosted open source gateway
- Inbound and outbound webhooks
- Automatic retries and message broker support
- Premium$999/month
- Flat rate irrespective of message volume
- Portal links and payload transformation
- RBAC, circuit breaking and white labelling
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- SAML SSO
- Dedicated support with SLA
- On-premises deployment assistance
- Cloud$undefined/month
- Hosted by Convoy
- 14 day trial limited to one project and 100 events a day
- Usage-based tiers above the trial
Firefly III
Free- Firefly IIIFree
- Full functionality, self-hosted
- No usage limits
- Community support, donations accepted
Which should you pick?
Choose Convoy if
- You need inbound and outbound.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want broker-driven ingestion.
Choose Firefly III if
- You need double-entry style ledger.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Docker.
- You also want multi-currency accounts.
Questions people ask
- Is Convoy or Firefly III better?
- Neither clearly leads. Convoy starts at Free and Firefly III at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Convoy or Firefly III?
- Convoy starts at Free and Firefly III at Free.
- Does Convoy or Firefly III run on more platforms?
- Convoy runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud. Firefly III runs on Web, Linux, Docker.
- Can I use Convoy for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Convoy best used for?
- Convoy is most often used for a fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party saas for compliance reasons, a high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licence, a team that also receives webhooks from many providers and wants ingestion, verification and deduplication in the same gateway, an engineering group that wants webhook delivery driven directly from an existing kafka or sqs topic. Of those, a fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party saas for compliance reasons and a high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licence are not what Firefly III is typically brought in for.
- What can Convoy do that Firefly III cannot?
- Convoy covers Inbound and outbound, Broker-driven ingestion, Payload transformation, Portal links. Firefly III covers Double-entry style ledger, Multi-currency accounts, Bill and subscription tracking, Rule engine.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Convoy: Is Convoy really open source?
Yes, the community edition is open source and self-hostable, covering both inbound and outbound webhooks with retries.
Firefly III: Can I pay someone to host Firefly III for me?
Not through the core project; some third-party providers sell Firefly III hosting independently, but there is no official managed service.
Convoy: What does premium cost?
A flat 999 US dollars a month, self-hosted, regardless of message volume.
Firefly III: Does it support multiple currencies?
Yes, natively, including accounts and transactions in different currencies.
Convoy: Does it receive webhooks as well as send them?
Yes, inbound ingestion with verification and deduplication is a first-class feature, unlike most webhook services.
Firefly III: Is it really free with no paid tier?
Yes, the software is free and open source under the AGPL; the project accepts donations but sells nothing.
Convoy: Do I have to self-host?
No, there is a hosted cloud, but the trial is capped at 100 events a day and self-hosting is the primary model.
Related pages
More on Firefly III
Other head to heads
- Convoy vs Kong
- Convoy vs Svix
- Convoy vs Tyk
- Convoy vs Janus Gateway
- Convoy vs Appwrite
- Convoy vs Gravitee
- Convoy vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Convoy vs Formance
- Convoy vs AWS API Gateway
- Convoy vs Hasura
- Convoy vs PocketBase
- Convoy vs Sensedia
- Convoy vs Sila
- Convoy vs Swagger
- Convoy vs TIBCO Mashery
- Convoy vs Zeplo
- Convoy vs Kong Gateway
- Convoy vs Actual Budget
- Convoy vs Lunch Money
- Convoy vs YNAB
- Convoy vs GnuCash
- Convoy vs Money Manager
- Convoy vs Wise
- Convoy vs Affirm
- Convoy vs Kraken
- Convoy vs Coinbase
- Convoy vs PayPal
- Convoy vs Monzo
- Convoy vs Revolut
- Convoy vs Banktivity
- Convoy vs Charles Schwab
- Convoy vs Copilot Money
- Convoy vs Credit Karma
- Convoy vs E*TRADE
- Convoy vs EveryDollar
- Firefly III vs Kong
- Firefly III vs Svix
- Firefly III vs Tyk
- Firefly III vs Janus Gateway
- Firefly III vs Appwrite
- Firefly III vs Gravitee
- Firefly III vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Firefly III vs Formance
- Firefly III vs AWS API Gateway
- Firefly III vs Hasura
- Firefly III vs PocketBase
- Firefly III vs Sensedia
- Firefly III vs Sila
- Firefly III vs Swagger
- Firefly III vs TIBCO Mashery
- Firefly III vs Zeplo
- Firefly III vs Kong Gateway
- Firefly III vs Actual Budget
- Firefly III vs Lunch Money
- Firefly III vs YNAB
- Firefly III vs GnuCash
- Firefly III vs Money Manager
- Firefly III vs Wise
- Firefly III vs Affirm
- Firefly III vs Kraken
- Firefly III vs Coinbase
- Firefly III vs PayPal
- Firefly III vs Monzo
- Firefly III vs Revolut
- Firefly III vs Banktivity
- Firefly III vs Charles Schwab
- Firefly III vs Copilot Money
- Firefly III vs Credit Karma
- Firefly III vs E*TRADE
- Firefly III vs EveryDollar
