Databases · head to head
Convex vs Nile

Convex
Databases
Reactive backend combining a document database, TypeScript server functions and live queries, source-available under the Functional Source Licence.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Nile
Databases
PostgreSQL database platform built for multi-tenant SaaS applications
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Convex the Functional Source Licence is not an OSI open source licence: competing use is prohibited until each release reaches its second anniversary and converts to Apache 2.0, so you may self-host but you may not build a service on it.; Nile limited to B2B SaaS use cases, not optimized for single-tenant applications
- They diverge on capability: Convex covers Reactive queries, Nile covers Multi-tenant virtualization.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Convex and Nile actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Convex
- Reactive queries
- TypeScript server functions
- ACID transactions
- Document database
- Scheduling and workflows
- File storage
- Text and vector search
- End-to-end types
Only in Nile
- Multi-tenant virtualization
- Serverless compute
- Vector embeddings
- Tenant branching
- Schema migration
- Tenant dashboards
- Global deployment
- PostgreSQL compatible
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Convex
- Collaborative applications where several users see the same data and every client must reflect a change immediatelynot Nile
- Agent backends that need durable state, scheduled work and transactional writes without assembling a queue, a database and a cachenot Nile
- Small product teams who need a complete backend, including auth integration, file storage and subscriptions, without hiring infrastructure engineersnot Nile
- Prototypes that must become production without a rewrite of the data layer, where end-to-end TypeScript types remove a class of integration bugsnot Nile
Nile
- Multi-tenant SaaS applications with per-customer isolationnot Convex
- Serverless workloads needing cost-efficient auto-scalingnot Convex
- RAG applications leveraging vector embeddingsnot Convex
- Applications requiring per-tenant analytics dashboardsnot Convex
- Cross-customer analytics using shared data tablesnot Convex
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Convex
- The Functional Source Licence is not an OSI open source licence: competing use is prohibited until each release reaches its second anniversary and converts to Apache 2.0, so you may self-host but you may not build a service on it.
- Transactions are bounded at one second of user code, 16 MiB read and written, 32,000 documents scanned and 16,000 written, so every backfill, migration or bulk import has to be chunked into scheduled batches rather than written as a single operation.
- There is no SQL and no query planner; you declare up to 32 indexes per table and traverse them, and joins are loops in TypeScript, so an unanticipated access pattern requires a schema and index change rather than a new query.
- It is not an analytical database, so reporting means streaming data out to a warehouse and BI tools cannot be pointed at Convex directly, which adds a pipeline the architecture diagram did not originally include.
- The application is written against Convex's function and client APIs rather than a standard protocol, so leaving means rewriting the data access layer and replacing the reactivity model, not repointing a connection string.
Nile
- Limited to B2B SaaS use cases, not optimized for single-tenant applications
- Query token abstraction makes pricing less transparent than traditional compute pricing
- Free plan limited to 50M query tokens and 1GB storage for development
- Serverless startup latency may impact performance-sensitive applications
- Per-million token overages require careful monitoring to avoid surprise costs
Pricing, plan by plan
Convex
Free- Free & StarterFree
- Supports 1-6 developers
- Reactive database
- File storage
- Professional$25/month per developer
- Supports up to 20 developers
- All Starter features
- Log streaming
- Business & Enterprise$2500/month minimum
- Supports 50+ developers
- SAML/SSO
- Service SLAs
Nile
Free- FreeFree
- 50M query tokens included
- 1 GB storage
- 500 connections
- Pro$15/month
- 150M query tokens included
- 5 GB storage
- 10,000 connections
- Scale$350/month
- 500M query tokens included
- 50 GB storage
- 100,000 connections
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Custom resource allocation
- Large-scale workloads supporting millions of tenants
- Designated support
Which should you pick?
Choose Convex if
- You need reactive queries.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want typescript server functions.
Choose Nile if
- You need multi-tenant virtualization.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want serverless compute.
Questions people ask
- Is Convex or Nile better?
- Neither clearly leads. Convex starts at Free and Nile at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Convex or Nile?
- Convex starts at Free and Nile at Free.
- Does Convex or Nile run on more platforms?
- Convex runs on Web. Nile runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Convex for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Convex best used for?
- Convex is most often used for collaborative applications where several users see the same data and every client must reflect a change immediately, agent backends that need durable state, scheduled work and transactional writes without assembling a queue, a database and a cache, small product teams who need a complete backend, including auth integration, file storage and subscriptions, without hiring infrastructure engineers, prototypes that must become production without a rewrite of the data layer, where end-to-end typescript types remove a class of integration bugs. Of those, collaborative applications where several users see the same data and every client must reflect a change immediately and agent backends that need durable state, scheduled work and transactional writes without assembling a queue, a database and a cache are not what Nile is typically brought in for.
- What can Convex do that Nile cannot?
- Convex covers Reactive queries, TypeScript server functions, ACID transactions, Document database. Nile covers Multi-tenant virtualization, Serverless compute, Vector embeddings, Tenant branching.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Convex: Is Convex open source?
It is source-available under FSL-1.1-Apache-2.0. You may read, modify and self-host it, but competing use is prohibited until each release converts to Apache 2.0 on its second anniversary.
Nile: What are query tokens and how are they calculated?
Query tokens are abstract units of CPU and memory used when queries execute on Nile's serverless compute. The platform uses this abstraction to enable fair, predictable pay-per-use pricing.
SourceConvex: Can I self-host it?
Yes. The backend, dashboard and CLI can run on your own infrastructure, with most of the features of the cloud product. Self-hosted instances include a telemetry beacon that can be disabled.
Nile: Do all Nile plans include multi-tenant isolation?
Yes. All plans including the free tier include unlimited databases, tenants, and vector embeddings with built-in data isolation.
SourceConvex: Does it support SQL?
No. Data is accessed through a TypeScript query builder over declared indexes. Relationships are traversed in code, which is explicit and type-safe but means no ad hoc querying.
Nile: What is included in the Pro plan?
The Pro plan ($15/month) includes 150M query tokens, 5GB storage, 10,000 connections, and a 99.95% SLA. SAML and MFA authentication features are available on Pro and above.
SourceConvex: What happens if a mutation exceeds the limits?
It fails rather than running longer, so bulk work must be split into batches and scheduled. The limits are per transaction: one second of user code, 16 MiB read and written, 32,000 documents scanned and 16,000 written.
Convex: How does reactivity actually work?
Queries are deterministic functions and Convex records the data each one read. When a mutation changes that data, affected queries are re-run and subscribed clients receive the new result, so cache invalidation is handled by the platform.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Convex vs PostgreSQL
- Convex vs Airtable
- Convex vs Cockroach Labs
- Convex vs Amazon Aurora
- Convex vs Readyset
- Convex vs FaunaDB
- Convex vs LanceDB
- Convex vs Xata
- Convex vs Materialize
- Convex vs BigQuery
- Convex vs dbt
- Convex vs Apache Doris
- Convex vs ArangoDB
- Convex vs Canary Labs
- Convex vs Chroma
- Convex vs Cloudinary
- Convex vs DynamoDB
- Convex vs Apache Solr
- Convex vs PlanetScale
- Convex vs MotherDuck
- Convex vs Turso
- Convex vs Aiven
- Convex vs DataStax
- Convex vs Zilliz
- Convex vs DuckDB
- Convex vs EMQX
- Convex vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Convex vs Google Cloud SQL
- Convex vs Firestore
- Nile vs PostgreSQL
- Nile vs Airtable
- Nile vs Cockroach Labs
- Nile vs Amazon Aurora
- Nile vs Readyset
- Nile vs FaunaDB
- Nile vs LanceDB
- Nile vs Xata
- Nile vs Materialize
- Nile vs BigQuery
- Nile vs dbt
- Nile vs Apache Doris
- Nile vs ArangoDB
- Nile vs Canary Labs
- Nile vs Chroma
- Nile vs Cloudinary
- Nile vs DynamoDB
- Nile vs Apache Solr
- Nile vs PlanetScale
- Nile vs MotherDuck
- Nile vs Turso
- Nile vs Aiven
- Nile vs DataStax
- Nile vs Zilliz
- Nile vs DuckDB
- Nile vs EMQX
- Nile vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Nile vs Google Cloud SQL
- Nile vs Firestore
