Technology · head to head
Confluent Cloud vs Depot

Confluent Cloud
Technology
The data streaming platform built on Apache Kafka, delivered as a fully managed cloud service
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Depot
Developer Tools
Cloud-based builds and CI runs 55x faster with less cost
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Confluent Cloud requires understanding of eCKU (Elastic Confluent Unit) billing; Depot developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Confluent Cloud and Depot actually diverge.
| Attribute | Confluent Cloud | Depot |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | Unknown |
| Platforms | Web | Cloud, GitHub, CLI |
| Category | Technology | Developer Tools |
| Founded | Unknown | 2022 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Confluent Cloud
Nothing recorded that Depot does not also cover.
Only in Depot
- Depot CI
- Container builds
- GitHub Actions runners
- Distributed caching
- Build API
- Depot Registry
- Cross-platform builds
- SSH debugging
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Confluent Cloud
- Apache Kafka event streaming and processingnot Depot
- Real-time data pipeline architecturenot Depot
- Multi-cloud event broker deploymentnot Depot
- Stream processing and analyticsnot Depot
- Microservices data synchronizationnot Depot
Depot
- Accelerating Docker builds for container-based developmentnot Confluent Cloud
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster infrastructurenot Confluent Cloud
- Distributing cache across Monorepo buildsnot Confluent Cloud
- Debugging failed CI builds interactively with SSHnot Confluent Cloud
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Confluent Cloud
- Requires understanding of eCKU (Elastic Confluent Unit) billing
- Data in/egress costs add $0.014-$0.050 per GB
- Storage costs of $0.03-$0.08 per GB-month
- Minimum commitment recommended for cost optimization
Depot
- Developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development
- Startup plan at $200/mo is expensive for smaller teams
- Business plan requires custom pricing consultation
- macOS M2 runners not available on Developer plan
Pricing, plan by plan
Confluent Cloud
Free- BasicFree
- Free first eCKU
- Then $0.14 per eCKU-hour
- 99.5% uptime
- Standard$385/month
- $0.75 per eCKU-hour
- 99.99% uptime with 2+ eCKUs
- Infinite storage
- Enterprise$895/month
- $1.75-$2.25 per eCKU-hour
- Private networking
- GBps+ scaling
- Freight$2300/month
- $2.25 per eCKU-hour
- Specialty logging tier
- Highest throughput requirements
Depot
Free- Developer$20/month
- 1 user
- 500 Docker build minutes per month
- 2,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Startup$200/month
- Unlimited users
- 5,000 Docker build minutes per month
- 20,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Business$undefined/custom
- Custom pricing
- Unlimited users
- Custom monthly compute
Which should you pick?
Choose Depot if
- You need depot ci.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, GitHub, CLI.
- You also want container builds.
Questions people ask
- Is Confluent Cloud or Depot better?
- Neither clearly leads. Confluent Cloud starts at Free and Depot at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Confluent Cloud or Depot?
- Confluent Cloud starts at Free and Depot at Free.
- Does Confluent Cloud or Depot run on more platforms?
- Confluent Cloud runs on Web. Depot runs on Cloud, GitHub, CLI.
- Can I use Confluent Cloud for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Confluent Cloud best used for?
- Confluent Cloud is most often used for apache kafka event streaming and processing, real-time data pipeline architecture, multi-cloud event broker deployment, stream processing and analytics. Of those, apache kafka event streaming and processing and real-time data pipeline architecture are not what Depot is typically brought in for.
- What can Confluent Cloud do that Depot cannot?
- Depot covers Depot CI, Container builds, GitHub Actions runners, Distributed caching.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Confluent Cloud: How much does Confluent Cloud cost?
Confluent Cloud pricing starts free on Basic tier with $0.14 per eCKU-hour, Standard at $0.75 per eCKU-hour (~$385/month base), Enterprise at $1.75-$2.25 per eCKU-hour (~$895/month base), and Freight specialty tier at $2.25 per eCKU-hour (~$2300/month).
SourceDepot: How much faster are Depot runners compared to GitHub Actions?
Depot runners offer 30% faster CPUs and 10x faster networking than standard GitHub-hosted runners, enabling builds to complete significantly faster.
SourceConfluent Cloud: Is there a free tier for Confluent Cloud?
Yes, the Basic tier is free with one eCKU credit included. Additional usage is billed at $0.14 per eCKU-hour, plus data transfer and storage fees apply.
SourceDepot: What is included in the Developer plan?
Developer plan ($20/month) includes 500 Docker build minutes, 2,000 Depot CI minutes, 2,000 GitHub Actions minutes, 25 GB storage, unlimited concurrency, and community support.
SourceConfluent Cloud: What additional fees does Confluent Cloud charge?
Beyond eCKU hours, Confluent charges data in/egress at $0.014-$0.050 per GB and storage at $0.03-$0.08 per GB-month. Costs vary by tier and region.
SourceDepot: Can I use Depot with my own AWS account?
Yes, Depot Managed allows deployment within customer AWS accounts. This is available to interested customers; contact sales for details.
SourceConfluent Cloud: Does Confluent offer discounts for higher usage?
Yes, volume discounts are negotiated upfront based on annual consumption estimates. Annual commitments allow flexible cross-product allocation with guaranteed cost savings.
SourceRelated pages
More on Confluent Cloud
Other head to heads
- Confluent Cloud vs Linear
- Confluent Cloud vs Asana
- Confluent Cloud vs ClickUp
- Confluent Cloud vs Figma
- Confluent Cloud vs CloudAMQP
- Confluent Cloud vs MongoDB Atlas
- Confluent Cloud vs Google Chrome
- Confluent Cloud vs Apache Spark
- Confluent Cloud vs Nagios XI
- Confluent Cloud vs Zabbix Cloud
- Confluent Cloud vs Monday.com
- Confluent Cloud vs Mozilla Firefox
- Confluent Cloud vs StatusCake
- Confluent Cloud vs Storybook
- Confluent Cloud vs WebStorm
- Confluent Cloud vs Intercom
- Confluent Cloud vs LaunchDarkly
- Confluent Cloud vs WarpBuild
- Confluent Cloud vs Blacksmith
- Confluent Cloud vs Nixpacks
- Confluent Cloud vs Buildkite
- Confluent Cloud vs GitLab CI/CD
- Confluent Cloud vs Namespace
- Confluent Cloud vs Earthly
- Confluent Cloud vs Nx Cloud
- Confluent Cloud vs Dagger
- Confluent Cloud vs Garden
- Confluent Cloud vs Ansible
- Confluent Cloud vs ConfigCat
- Confluent Cloud vs Avo
- Confluent Cloud vs Azure DevOps
- Confluent Cloud vs Backstage
- Confluent Cloud vs Bitbucket
- Confluent Cloud vs Claude Code
- Confluent Cloud vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Depot vs Linear
- Depot vs Asana
- Depot vs ClickUp
- Depot vs Figma
- Depot vs CloudAMQP
- Depot vs MongoDB Atlas
- Depot vs Google Chrome
- Depot vs Apache Spark
- Depot vs Nagios XI
- Depot vs Zabbix Cloud
- Depot vs Monday.com
- Depot vs Mozilla Firefox
- Depot vs StatusCake
- Depot vs Storybook
- Depot vs WebStorm
- Depot vs Intercom
- Depot vs LaunchDarkly
- Depot vs WarpBuild
- Depot vs Blacksmith
- Depot vs Nixpacks
- Depot vs Buildkite
- Depot vs GitLab CI/CD
- Depot vs Namespace
- Depot vs Earthly
- Depot vs Nx Cloud
- Depot vs Dagger
- Depot vs Garden
- Depot vs Ansible
- Depot vs ConfigCat
- Depot vs Avo
- Depot vs Azure DevOps
- Depot vs Backstage
- Depot vs Bitbucket
- Depot vs Claude Code
- Depot vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
