Softwr

Developer Tools · head to head

ConfigCat vs Remix

ConfigCat logo

ConfigCat

Developer Tools

Feature flag service priced per flag and environment with unlimited seats and unlimited monthly active users

From
Free
Free plan
Yes
Full reviewWebsite
Remix logo

Remix

Web Development

Full-stack JavaScript framework for building modern web applications

From
Free
Free plan
Yes
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: ConfigCat there is no experimentation or statistical analysis engine, so teams wanting real A/B tests with significance testing must buy and integrate a separate analytics or experimentation product.; Remix different mental model than traditional React SPAs requires learning curve
  • They diverge on capability: ConfigCat covers Feature flags and configuration, Remix covers Server-side rendering.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which ConfigCat and Remix actually diverge.

Attributes where ConfigCat and Remix differ
AttributeConfigCatRemix
Pricing modelPer month by feature flag and environment countopen-source
PlatformsWeb, API, iOS, Android, Node.js, .NET, Java, Python, GoWeb
CategoryDeveloper ToolsWeb Development

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in ConfigCat

  • Feature flags and configuration
  • Percentage rollouts
  • Targeting rules and segments
  • Unlimited seats
  • Global CDN delivery
  • Audit log
  • Public API and webhooks
  • SDKs across languages

Only in Remix

  • Server-side rendering
  • File-based routing
  • Data loading patterns
  • Form handling
  • Error boundaries
  • Client-side navigation
  • Web standard APIs

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

ConfigCat

  • A consumer or mobile app with millions of users where per-MAU flag pricing would cost more than the flags are worthnot Remix
  • A team that wants every engineer, product manager and support agent to have a login without paying per seatnot Remix
  • Decoupling deployment from release with percentage rollouts and a kill switch, without buying an experimentation platformnot Remix
  • A small team that needs ten flags permanently and can run indefinitely on the free tiernot Remix

Remix

  • Building full-stack applications with progressive enhancementnot ConfigCat
  • Server-rendered applications with rapid page transitionsnot ConfigCat
  • Projects prioritizing web standards and accessibilitynot ConfigCat
  • Applications requiring sophisticated data loading patternsnot ConfigCat

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

ConfigCat

  • There is no experimentation or statistical analysis engine, so teams wanting real A/B tests with significance testing must buy and integrate a separate analytics or experimentation product.
  • Pricing by flag count punishes exactly the hygiene you want: the Pro tier caps at 100 flags, so teams that do not aggressively retire stale flags are pushed to the 325 dollar Smart tier for housekeeping reasons rather than growth.
  • The free tier allows only 2 environments, which does not cover the common development, staging and production split, so almost any real deployment starts on a paid plan.
  • It is a smaller vendor than the category incumbents, so enterprise procurement teams will find less depth in compliance attestations, contractual terms and reference architecture than LaunchDarkly offers.
  • Flag evaluation relies on SDK-side caching of a CDN-delivered config, which is fast but means propagation of a change is eventually consistent rather than instant, something to understand before relying on it as an emergency kill switch.

Remix

  • Different mental model than traditional React SPAs requires learning curve
  • Smaller ecosystem compared to Next.js despite Shopify backing
  • SSR adds server-side complexity for teams preferring client-first architecture
  • Form-first approach not optimal for highly interactive UI-heavy applications

Pricing, plan by plan

ConfigCat

Free
  • Forever FreeFree
    • 10 feature flags
    • 2 environments and 2 products
    • 2 segments
  • Pro$110/month
    • 100 feature flags
    • 3 environments and 3 products
    • Unlimited seats and MAUs
  • Smart$325/month
    • Unlimited feature flags
    • Unlimited environments, products and segments
    • Unlimited seats and MAUs
  • Enterprise$900/month
    • Everything in Smart
    • Enterprise support and controls
    • Unlimited everything on flag counts

Remix

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the Remix review.

Which should you pick?

Choose ConfigCat if

  • You need feature flags and configuration.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, API, iOS, Android, Node.js, .NET, Java, Python, Go.
  • You also want percentage rollouts.
ConfigCat review

Choose Remix if

  • You need server-side rendering.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You also want file-based routing.
Remix review

Questions people ask

Is ConfigCat or Remix better?
Neither clearly leads. ConfigCat starts at Free and Remix at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, ConfigCat or Remix?
ConfigCat starts at Free and Remix at Free.
Does ConfigCat or Remix run on more platforms?
ConfigCat runs on Web, API, iOS, Android, Node.js, .NET, Java, Python, Go. Remix runs on Web.
Can I use ConfigCat for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is ConfigCat best used for?
ConfigCat is most often used for a consumer or mobile app with millions of users where per-mau flag pricing would cost more than the flags are worth, a team that wants every engineer, product manager and support agent to have a login without paying per seat, decoupling deployment from release with percentage rollouts and a kill switch, without buying an experimentation platform, a small team that needs ten flags permanently and can run indefinitely on the free tier. Of those, a consumer or mobile app with millions of users where per-mau flag pricing would cost more than the flags are worth and a team that wants every engineer, product manager and support agent to have a login without paying per seat are not what Remix is typically brought in for.
What can ConfigCat do that Remix cannot?
ConfigCat covers Feature flags and configuration, Percentage rollouts, Targeting rules and segments, Unlimited seats. Remix covers Server-side rendering, File-based routing, Data loading patterns, Form handling.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

ConfigCat: How is ConfigCat priced?

By feature flag, environment and product count. Seats, monthly active users and flag reads are unlimited on every plan.

Remix: Does Remix require React?

Yes, Remix is built on React and uses React components for the UI layer, though Remix simplifies server-side rendering and data loading patterns.

Source
ConfigCat: Is the free tier usable?

For small projects yes, but at 10 flags and 2 environments it will not cover a dev, staging and production setup.

Remix: Can Remix be used for static site generation?

Remix is primarily a server-rendering framework; it supports static exports but is optimized for dynamic server-rendered applications.

Source
ConfigCat: Can it run A/B tests?

It can split traffic, but there is no statistics engine. You need a separate analytics tool to decide a winner.

Remix: How does Remix compare to Next.js?

Both are full-stack frameworks, but Remix emphasizes web fundamentals and simpler mental models while Next.js focuses on both static generation and server rendering.

Source
ConfigCat: How fast does a flag change take effect?

SDKs poll and cache, so changes propagate on the polling interval rather than instantly.

Share

Related pages

More on ConfigCat

More on Remix

Keep looking

Other head to heads