Developer Tools · head to head
ConfigCat vs Cosign

ConfigCat
Developer Tools
Feature flag service priced per flag and environment with unlimited seats and unlimited monthly active users
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Cosign
Cybersecurity
Signs and verifies container images and artifacts, with or without managing keys
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ConfigCat there is no experimentation or statistical analysis engine, so teams wanting real A/B tests with significance testing must buy and integrate a separate analytics or experimentation product.; Cosign keyless signing inherits every weakness of the identity provider behind it. Sigstore’s own threat model states that if an identity provider is compromised, Sigstore will issue certificates to those identities, so a compromised account produces perfectly valid signatures.
- They diverge on capability: ConfigCat covers Feature flags and configuration, Cosign covers Keyless signing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ConfigCat and Cosign actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ConfigCat
- Feature flags and configuration
- Percentage rollouts
- Targeting rules and segments
- Unlimited seats
- Global CDN delivery
- Audit log
- Public API and webhooks
- SDKs across languages
Only in Cosign
- Keyless signing
- Key and KMS signing
- Registry-native storage
- In-toto attestations
- Offline verification
- Trusted root and signing config
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ConfigCat
- A consumer or mobile app with millions of users where per-MAU flag pricing would cost more than the flags are worthnot Cosign
- A team that wants every engineer, product manager and support agent to have a login without paying per seatnot Cosign
- Decoupling deployment from release with percentage rollouts and a kill switch, without buying an experimentation platformnot Cosign
- A small team that needs ten flags permanently and can run indefinitely on the free tiernot Cosign
Cosign
- Signing container images in a build pipeline without managing long-lived private keysnot ConfigCat
- Attaching a signed bill of materials to a release so consumers can verify its provenancenot ConfigCat
- Meeting a customer or regulatory requirement for signed artifactsnot ConfigCat
- Verifying third-party images before they enter an internal registrynot ConfigCat
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ConfigCat
- There is no experimentation or statistical analysis engine, so teams wanting real A/B tests with significance testing must buy and integrate a separate analytics or experimentation product.
- Pricing by flag count punishes exactly the hygiene you want: the Pro tier caps at 100 flags, so teams that do not aggressively retire stale flags are pushed to the 325 dollar Smart tier for housekeeping reasons rather than growth.
- The free tier allows only 2 environments, which does not cover the common development, staging and production split, so almost any real deployment starts on a paid plan.
- It is a smaller vendor than the category incumbents, so enterprise procurement teams will find less depth in compliance attestations, contractual terms and reference architecture than LaunchDarkly offers.
- Flag evaluation relies on SDK-side caching of a CDN-delivered config, which is fast but means propagation of a change is eventually consistent rather than instant, something to understand before relying on it as an emergency kill switch.
Cosign
- Keyless signing inherits every weakness of the identity provider behind it. Sigstore’s own threat model states that if an identity provider is compromised, Sigstore will issue certificates to those identities, so a compromised account produces perfectly valid signatures.
- A signature proves who signed, never whether they should have. The documentation is explicit that Sigstore cannot determine authorisation, so every consumer must write and maintain their own identity and issuer policy or verification means nothing.
- Nothing is enforced without an admission controller. Signing changes what you can prove, not what runs, and the official policy controller has a small maintainer base for a component sitting in a cluster admission path.
- Upgrades break pipelines. Version 3 changed defaults, version 4 is announced as removing legacy functionality and roughly half the command line flags, and two official client libraries still lacked support for the new log format as of mid 2026.
- Signatures do not expire. An artifact signed before a maintainer account was compromised and one signed after are indistinguishable unless somebody is actively monitoring the transparency log, and almost nobody is.
Pricing, plan by plan
ConfigCat
Free- Forever FreeFree
- 10 feature flags
- 2 environments and 2 products
- 2 segments
- Pro$110/month
- 100 feature flags
- 3 environments and 3 products
- Unlimited seats and MAUs
- Smart$325/month
- Unlimited feature flags
- Unlimited environments, products and segments
- Unlimited seats and MAUs
- Enterprise$900/month
- Everything in Smart
- Enterprise support and controls
- Unlimited everything on flag counts
Cosign
Free- CosignFree
- Apache-2.0
- Public Sigstore infrastructure free to use
- No usage limits published
Which should you pick?
Choose ConfigCat if
- You need feature flags and configuration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, API, iOS, Android, Node.js, .NET, Java, Python, Go.
- You also want percentage rollouts.
Choose Cosign if
- You need keyless signing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- You also want key and kms signing.
Questions people ask
- Is ConfigCat or Cosign better?
- Neither clearly leads. ConfigCat starts at Free and Cosign at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ConfigCat or Cosign?
- ConfigCat starts at Free and Cosign at Free.
- Does ConfigCat or Cosign run on more platforms?
- ConfigCat runs on Web, API, iOS, Android, Node.js, .NET, Java, Python, Go. Cosign runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use ConfigCat for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is ConfigCat best used for?
- ConfigCat is most often used for a consumer or mobile app with millions of users where per-mau flag pricing would cost more than the flags are worth, a team that wants every engineer, product manager and support agent to have a login without paying per seat, decoupling deployment from release with percentage rollouts and a kill switch, without buying an experimentation platform, a small team that needs ten flags permanently and can run indefinitely on the free tier. Of those, a consumer or mobile app with millions of users where per-mau flag pricing would cost more than the flags are worth and a team that wants every engineer, product manager and support agent to have a login without paying per seat are not what Cosign is typically brought in for.
- What can ConfigCat do that Cosign cannot?
- ConfigCat covers Feature flags and configuration, Percentage rollouts, Targeting rules and segments, Unlimited seats. Cosign covers Keyless signing, Key and KMS signing, Registry-native storage, In-toto attestations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ConfigCat: How is ConfigCat priced?
By feature flag, environment and product count. Seats, monthly active users and flag reads are unlimited on every plan.
Cosign: Does Cosign tell me if an image is vulnerable?
No. It has no vulnerability knowledge whatsoever. It can carry an SBOM as a signed attestation but never reads it. Pair it with a scanner.
ConfigCat: Is the free tier usable?
For small projects yes, but at 10 flags and 2 environments it will not cover a dev, staging and production setup.
Cosign: Is signing alone enough?
No. Verification is a command somebody runs. Without an admission controller enforcing it, an unsigned image still runs.
ConfigCat: Can it run A/B tests?
It can split traffic, but there is no statistics engine. You need a separate analytics tool to decide a winner.
Cosign: What does a bare cosign verify actually prove?
Very little. Without a pinned certificate identity and OIDC issuer, it accepts a valid signature from any identity at all.
ConfigCat: How fast does a flag change take effect?
SDKs poll and cache, so changes propagate on the polling interval rather than instantly.
Cosign: What is the risk of keyless signing?
Your OIDC provider becomes the root of trust. Compromise of that account yields genuine, verifiable signatures, so account security is the control that matters.
Cosign: Should we expect breaking changes?
Yes. Version 4 is announced to remove roughly half the flags, and a post-quantum migration is named as a further breaking change after that.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- ConfigCat vs Nix
- ConfigCat vs Depot
- ConfigCat vs Blacksmith
- ConfigCat vs WarpBuild
- ConfigCat vs Namespace
- ConfigCat vs OpsLevel
- ConfigCat vs Earthly
- ConfigCat vs Ansible
- ConfigCat vs Garden
- ConfigCat vs Okteto
- ConfigCat vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- ConfigCat vs Bazel
- ConfigCat vs Backstage
- ConfigCat vs Bitbucket
- ConfigCat vs Claude Code
- ConfigCat vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- ConfigCat vs Cody
- ConfigCat vs Cortex
- ConfigCat vs Sigstore
- ConfigCat vs Syft
- ConfigCat vs Chainguard
- ConfigCat vs HashiCorp Vault
- ConfigCat vs Infisical
- ConfigCat vs OWASP ZAP
- ConfigCat vs Wireshark
- ConfigCat vs Bitwarden
- ConfigCat vs Semgrep
- ConfigCat vs Trivy
- ConfigCat vs authentik
- ConfigCat vs Microsoft Intune
- ConfigCat vs Netwrix
- ConfigCat vs NordVPN
- ConfigCat vs Omada Identity
- ConfigCat vs Ory
- ConfigCat vs ProtonVPN
- ConfigCat vs Grype
- Cosign vs Nix
- Cosign vs Depot
- Cosign vs Blacksmith
- Cosign vs WarpBuild
- Cosign vs Namespace
- Cosign vs OpsLevel
- Cosign vs Earthly
- Cosign vs Ansible
- Cosign vs Garden
- Cosign vs Okteto
- Cosign vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Cosign vs Bazel
- Cosign vs Backstage
- Cosign vs Bitbucket
- Cosign vs Claude Code
- Cosign vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Cosign vs Cody
- Cosign vs Cortex
- Cosign vs Sigstore
- Cosign vs Syft
- Cosign vs Chainguard
- Cosign vs HashiCorp Vault
- Cosign vs Infisical
- Cosign vs OWASP ZAP
- Cosign vs Wireshark
- Cosign vs Bitwarden
- Cosign vs Semgrep
- Cosign vs Trivy
- Cosign vs authentik
- Cosign vs Microsoft Intune
- Cosign vs Netwrix
- Cosign vs NordVPN
- Cosign vs Omada Identity
- Cosign vs Ory
- Cosign vs ProtonVPN
- Cosign vs Grype
