Energy · head to head
Cognite Data Fusion vs Fathom

Cognite Data Fusion
Energy
Industrial data platform that contextualises OT, IT and engineering data into an asset-centric knowledge graph
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Fathom has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Cognite Data Fusion the platform is only as good as the contextualisation work, and that mapping effort is a consulting project that regularly costs more than the first-year subscription.; Fathom team plan requires minimum 2 users; cannot purchase single seat at team pricing
- They diverge on capability: Cognite Data Fusion covers Asset-centric data model, Fathom covers Auto-recording.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cognite Data Fusion and Fathom actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cognite Data Fusion | Fathom |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Unknown |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Cloud | Web, Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams |
| Category | Energy | AI |
| Founded | Unknown | 2020 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cognite Data Fusion
- Asset-centric data model
- Entity matching
- P&ID parsing
- 3D contextualisation
- Cognite Atlas AI
- Data workflows
- Open SDKs
- Extractors
Only in Fathom
- Auto-recording
- AI summaries
- Transcription
- Highlight clips
- Zoom
- Google Meet
- HubSpot
- Salesforce
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cognite Data Fusion
- An operator that wants engineers to find the drawing, the sensor trend and the last work order for a valve from one searchnot Fathom
- A company standardising asset data across sites so an analytics team can build once and deploy to many plantsnot Fathom
- An upstream operator building a production-optimisation model that needs sensor data joined to equipment metadatanot Fathom
- A team replacing a stalled internal data-lake project where nobody could reconstruct what the tag names meantnot Fathom
Fathom
- AI-powered meeting transcription and automatic note-taking for sales teams and professionalsnot Cognite Data Fusion
- Meeting analysis with AI scorecards and action item generation that syncs to CRMsnot Cognite Data Fusion
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cognite Data Fusion
- The platform is only as good as the contextualisation work, and that mapping effort is a consulting project that regularly costs more than the first-year subscription.
- Pricing is consumption-based and unpublished, so costs move with data volume and usage patterns you cannot forecast well until a year in.
- It does not replace your historian, your ERP or your maintenance system, so Cognite is an additional recurring cost layered on systems you still pay for.
- The reference base and data model lean heavily towards Norwegian and wider oil, gas and process industries; discrete manufacturing fit is weaker and the local partner network thinner outside energy.
- Getting value out requires in-house Python and data engineering skill; organisations without a data team end up dependent on Cognite professional services for every new use case.
Fathom
- Team plan requires minimum 2 users; cannot purchase single seat at team pricing
- CRM field sync and deal view summaries available only on Business plan ($34/user/month) and above
Pricing, plan by plan
Cognite Data Fusion
On request- Cognite Data Fusion$undefined/year
- Consumption-based pricing on data volume, compute and users
- Available through cloud marketplaces with private offers
- Contextualisation and onboarding quoted as a separate engagement
Fathom
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fathom review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Cognite Data Fusion if
- You need asset-centric data model.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want entity matching.
Choose Fathom if
- You need auto-recording.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams.
- You also want ai summaries.
Questions people ask
- Is Cognite Data Fusion or Fathom better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cognite Data Fusion starts at On request and Fathom at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cognite Data Fusion or Fathom?
- Fathom has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Cognite Data Fusion and Free for Fathom.
- Does Cognite Data Fusion or Fathom run on more platforms?
- Cognite Data Fusion runs on Web, Cloud. Fathom runs on Web, Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams.
- Can I use Fathom for free?
- Yes. Fathom has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Cognite Data Fusion starts at On request.
- What is Cognite Data Fusion best used for?
- Cognite Data Fusion is most often used for an operator that wants engineers to find the drawing, the sensor trend and the last work order for a valve from one search, a company standardising asset data across sites so an analytics team can build once and deploy to many plants, an upstream operator building a production-optimisation model that needs sensor data joined to equipment metadata, a team replacing a stalled internal data-lake project where nobody could reconstruct what the tag names meant. Of those, an operator that wants engineers to find the drawing, the sensor trend and the last work order for a valve from one search and a company standardising asset data across sites so an analytics team can build once and deploy to many plants are not what Fathom is typically brought in for.
- What can Cognite Data Fusion do that Fathom cannot?
- Cognite Data Fusion covers Asset-centric data model, Entity matching, P&ID parsing, 3D contextualisation. Fathom covers Auto-recording, AI summaries, Transcription, Highlight clips.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cognite Data Fusion: Is Cognite a historian?
No. It reads from historians such as PI System and adds context. You still need the historian underneath.
Fathom: What is the most affordable paid plan for individuals, and what does it include?
Fathom Premium costs $20 per month (or $16 per month billed annually). It includes advanced summaries, action items, and a conversational AI assistant, in addition to the features in the free plan.
SourceCognite Data Fusion: How is it priced?
Consumption-based on data, compute and users, quoted per customer. Nothing is published.
Fathom: What is included in Fathom's free plan?
The free plan includes unlimited recordings, transcriptions, AI summaries, clips, and playlists at no cost forever.
SourceCognite Data Fusion: How long does a deployment take?
First useful graph in a few months is realistic; full plant contextualisation across a site is typically a year or more.
Fathom: How much does the Team plan cost per user, and what features does it add?
The Team plan costs $19 per month per user (minimum 2 users, or $15 per month annually). It includes everything from Premium plus global search, collaboration features, and team playlists.
SourceCognite Data Fusion: Can we do the contextualisation ourselves?
Technically yes, the SDKs and matching tools are open, but most customers use Cognite or a partner for the first site.
Fathom: What trial or guarantee is available before committing to a paid plan?
All paid plans offer a 90-day guarantee to test features risk-free.
SourceFathom: Does Fathom offer free or discounted plans for startups or nonprofits?
Yes, qualified portfolio companies get up to 2 years free, and nonprofits can apply for 10 free seats.
SourceRelated pages
More on Cognite Data Fusion
Other head to heads
- Cognite Data Fusion vs AVEVA PI System
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Novity
- Cognite Data Fusion vs AutoGrid Flex
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Bidgely UtilityAI
- Cognite Data Fusion vs OATI webSmartEnergy
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Stem Athena
- Cognite Data Fusion vs ABB Ability
- Cognite Data Fusion vs iHawk by Cyberhawk
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Wood Mackenzie Lens
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Bently Nevada System 1
- Cognite Data Fusion vs SolarWinds
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Cutsforth InsightCM
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Landis+Gyr Gridstream
- Cognite Data Fusion vs OSIsoft PI System
- Cognite Data Fusion vs P2 Energy Solutions
- Cognite Data Fusion vs OATI webOASIS
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Stable Diffusion
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Together AI
- Cognite Data Fusion vs AI21 Labs
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Banana
- Cognite Data Fusion vs DeepSeek
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Grok
- Cognite Data Fusion vs NotebookLM
- Cognite Data Fusion vs RunPod
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Pika
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Anthropic API
- Cognite Data Fusion vs D-ID
- Cognite Data Fusion vs ChatGPT
- Cognite Data Fusion vs AutoGen
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Black Forest Labs
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Cartesia
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Helicone
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Ideogram
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Jasper
- Fathom vs AVEVA PI System
- Fathom vs Novity
- Fathom vs AutoGrid Flex
- Fathom vs Bidgely UtilityAI
- Fathom vs OATI webSmartEnergy
- Fathom vs Stem Athena
- Fathom vs ABB Ability
- Fathom vs iHawk by Cyberhawk
- Fathom vs Wood Mackenzie Lens
- Fathom vs Bently Nevada System 1
- Fathom vs SolarWinds
- Fathom vs Cutsforth InsightCM
- Fathom vs Landis+Gyr Gridstream
- Fathom vs OSIsoft PI System
- Fathom vs P2 Energy Solutions
- Fathom vs OATI webOASIS
- Fathom vs Stable Diffusion
- Fathom vs Together AI
- Fathom vs AI21 Labs
- Fathom vs Banana
- Fathom vs DeepSeek
- Fathom vs Grok
- Fathom vs NotebookLM
- Fathom vs RunPod
- Fathom vs Pika
- Fathom vs Anthropic API
- Fathom vs D-ID
- Fathom vs ChatGPT
- Fathom vs AutoGen
- Fathom vs Black Forest Labs
- Fathom vs Cartesia
- Fathom vs Helicone
- Fathom vs Ideogram
- Fathom vs Jasper

