Development Tools · head to head
Cody vs MySQL
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cody sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page; MySQL hot online backup is not in the free Community Server; MySQL Enterprise Backup is a paid Enterprise Edition component
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cody and MySQL actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cody
Nothing recorded that MySQL does not also cover.
Only in MySQL
- ACID compliance
- SQL support
- Multi-version concurrency control
- Replication
- Partitioning
- Stored procedures
- Triggers
- Views
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cody
- AI code assistance with context drawn from a whole private codebasenot MySQL
- Code search and navigation across many repositoriesnot MySQL
- Large scale code migrations and modernisation with Batch Changesnot MySQL
MySQL
- Web application backendnot Cody
- E-commerce platformsnot Cody
- Content management systemsnot Cody
- Data warehousingnot Cody
- Business applicationsnot Cody
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cody
- Sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page
- sourcegraph.com/cody redirects to the documentation rather than a Cody product or pricing page
- AI features are metered as credits included per user, and exceeding the allocation requires buying a higher volume bucket
- Volume credit buckets are sold as an add-on rather than included
- A customer success manager and premium support are optional paid extras on top of the Enterprise plan
- Standard support is 24x5 rather than 24x7, with round-the-clock coverage sold as an upgrade
- The published $16K figure is a starting price that scales with team size, so the actual cost is quoted rather than listed
MySQL
- Hot online backup is not in the free Community Server; MySQL Enterprise Backup is a paid Enterprise Edition component
- Transparent Data Encryption, data masking and de-identification are Enterprise Edition only
- MySQL Enterprise Firewall, which guards against SQL injection, and MySQL Enterprise Audit are both paid components
- External authentication against PAM or Windows Active Directory requires MySQL Enterprise Authentication
- The thread pool ships as MySQL Enterprise Scalability rather than in the community build
Pricing, plan by plan
Cody
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cody review.
MySQL
Free- Community EditionFree
- Open source license
- Full SQL support
- InnoDB storage engine
- Standard Edition$2000/year
- Commercial license
- Oracle Premier Support
- MySQL Enterprise backup
- Enterprise Edition$5000/year
- Advanced security
- MySQL Enterprise Monitor
- High Availability
Which should you pick?
Choose MySQL if
- You need acid compliance.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Macos, Linux, Unix.
- You also want sql support.
Questions people ask
- Is Cody or MySQL better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cody starts at Free and MySQL at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cody or MySQL?
- Cody starts at Free and MySQL at Free.
- Does Cody or MySQL run on more platforms?
- Cody runs on Web. MySQL runs on Windows, Macos, Linux, Unix.
- Can I use Cody for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cody best used for?
- Cody is most often used for ai code assistance with context drawn from a whole private codebase, code search and navigation across many repositories, large scale code migrations and modernisation with batch changes. Of those, ai code assistance with context drawn from a whole private codebase and code search and navigation across many repositories are not what MySQL is typically brought in for.
- What can Cody do that MySQL cannot?
- MySQL covers ACID compliance, SQL support, Multi-version concurrency control, Replication.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cody vs Visual Studio Code
- Cody vs ESLint
- Cody vs pnpm
- Cody vs Turborepo
- Cody vs Yarn
- Cody vs Ansible
- Cody vs Prettier
- Cody vs Vite
- Cody vs Webpack
- Cody vs Argo CD
- Cody vs Azure DevOps
- Cody vs Bitbucket
- Cody vs Buildkite
- Cody vs Claude Code
- Cody vs Deno
- Cody vs Fig
- Cody vs Git
- Cody vs GitHub Copilot
- Cody vs Django
- Cody vs Next.js
- Cody vs Flask
- Cody vs Laravel
- Cody vs npm
- Cody vs React
- Cody vs Vue.js
- Cody vs Nginx
- Cody vs Node.js
- Cody vs v0 by Vercel
- Cody vs Apache HTTP Server
- Cody vs Astro
- Cody vs Bolt.new
- Cody vs Carrd
- Cody vs .NET
- Cody vs Express.js
- Cody vs FastAPI
- Cody vs NestJS
- MySQL vs Visual Studio Code
- MySQL vs ESLint
- MySQL vs pnpm
- MySQL vs Turborepo
- MySQL vs Yarn
- MySQL vs Ansible
- MySQL vs Prettier
- MySQL vs Vite
- MySQL vs Webpack
- MySQL vs Argo CD
- MySQL vs Azure DevOps
- MySQL vs Bitbucket
- MySQL vs Buildkite
- MySQL vs Claude Code
- MySQL vs Deno
- MySQL vs Fig
- MySQL vs Git
- MySQL vs GitHub Copilot
- MySQL vs Django
- MySQL vs Next.js
- MySQL vs Flask
- MySQL vs Laravel
- MySQL vs npm
- MySQL vs React
- MySQL vs Vue.js
- MySQL vs Nginx
- MySQL vs Node.js
- MySQL vs v0 by Vercel
- MySQL vs Apache HTTP Server
- MySQL vs Astro
- MySQL vs Bolt.new
- MySQL vs Carrd
- MySQL vs .NET
- MySQL vs Express.js
- MySQL vs FastAPI
- MySQL vs NestJS

