Software · head to head
Bolt.new vs Cody
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bolt.new the free plan is capped at 300K tokens a day and 1M tokens a month; Cody sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bolt.new and Cody actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bolt.new
- Full-stack app generation
- Prompt-to-app creation
- Real-time editing
- Instant deployment
- Screenshot to UI
- Multi-framework support
- Live preview
- Code export
Only in Cody
Nothing recorded that Bolt.new does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bolt.new
- Rapid prototypingnot Cody
- MVP developmentnot Cody
- UI mockup creationnot Cody
- Full-stack app generationnot Cody
- Proof of conceptnot Cody
Cody
- AI code assistance with context drawn from a whole private codebasenot Bolt.new
- Code search and navigation across many repositoriesnot Bolt.new
- Large scale code migrations and modernisation with Batch Changesnot Bolt.new
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bolt.new
- The free plan is capped at 300K tokens a day and 1M tokens a month
- Pro starts at 10M tokens a month for $25, so heavy sessions are metered rather than unlimited
- Team seats are billed at $30 per member per month and tokens are not pooled across the team
- Unused tokens roll over for one additional month only, so they expire after two
Cody
- Sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page
- sourcegraph.com/cody redirects to the documentation rather than a Cody product or pricing page
- AI features are metered as credits included per user, and exceeding the allocation requires buying a higher volume bucket
- Volume credit buckets are sold as an add-on rather than included
- A customer success manager and premium support are optional paid extras on top of the Enterprise plan
- Standard support is 24x5 rather than 24x7, with round-the-clock coverage sold as an upgrade
- The published $16K figure is a starting price that scales with team size, so the actual cost is quoted rather than listed
Pricing, plan by plan
Bolt.new
Free- FreeFree
- Limited generations
- Basic templates
- Public projects
- Pro$20/month
- Unlimited generations
- Advanced AI models
- Private projects
Cody
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cody review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Bolt.new if
- You need full-stack app generation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want prompt-to-app creation.
Questions people ask
- Is Bolt.new or Cody better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bolt.new starts at Free and Cody at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bolt.new or Cody?
- Bolt.new starts at Free and Cody at Free.
- Does Bolt.new or Cody run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Bolt.new for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Bolt.new best used for?
- Bolt.new is most often used for rapid prototyping, mvp development, ui mockup creation, full-stack app generation. Of those, rapid prototyping and mvp development are not what Cody is typically brought in for.
- What can Bolt.new do that Cody cannot?
- Bolt.new covers Full-stack app generation, Prompt-to-app creation, Real-time editing, Instant deployment.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Bolt.new vs Django
- Bolt.new vs MySQL
- Bolt.new vs Next.js
- Bolt.new vs Flask
- Bolt.new vs Laravel
- Bolt.new vs npm
- Bolt.new vs React
- Bolt.new vs Vue.js
- Bolt.new vs Nginx
- Bolt.new vs Node.js
- Bolt.new vs v0 by Vercel
- Bolt.new vs Apache HTTP Server
- Bolt.new vs Astro
- Bolt.new vs Carrd
- Bolt.new vs .NET
- Bolt.new vs Express.js
- Bolt.new vs FastAPI
- Bolt.new vs NestJS
- Bolt.new vs Visual Studio Code
- Bolt.new vs ESLint
- Bolt.new vs pnpm
- Bolt.new vs Turborepo
- Bolt.new vs Yarn
- Bolt.new vs Ansible
- Bolt.new vs Prettier
- Bolt.new vs Vite
- Bolt.new vs Webpack
- Bolt.new vs Argo CD
- Bolt.new vs Azure DevOps
- Bolt.new vs Bitbucket
- Bolt.new vs Buildkite
- Bolt.new vs Claude Code
- Bolt.new vs Deno
- Bolt.new vs Fig
- Bolt.new vs Git
- Bolt.new vs GitHub Copilot
- Cody vs Django
- Cody vs MySQL
- Cody vs Next.js
- Cody vs Flask
- Cody vs Laravel
- Cody vs npm
- Cody vs React
- Cody vs Vue.js
- Cody vs Nginx
- Cody vs Node.js
- Cody vs v0 by Vercel
- Cody vs Apache HTTP Server
- Cody vs Astro
- Cody vs Carrd
- Cody vs .NET
- Cody vs Express.js
- Cody vs FastAPI
- Cody vs NestJS
- Cody vs Visual Studio Code
- Cody vs ESLint
- Cody vs pnpm
- Cody vs Turborepo
- Cody vs Yarn
- Cody vs Ansible
- Cody vs Prettier
- Cody vs Vite
- Cody vs Webpack
- Cody vs Argo CD
- Cody vs Azure DevOps
- Cody vs Bitbucket
- Cody vs Buildkite
- Cody vs Claude Code
- Cody vs Deno
- Cody vs Fig
- Cody vs Git
- Cody vs GitHub Copilot


