Software · head to head
Cody vs Linear
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cody sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page; Linear no task-level Gantt chart; Timeline view is available for projects only, not individual issues
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cody and Linear actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cody
Nothing recorded that Linear does not also cover.
Only in Linear
- Fast, real-time sync
- Keyboard-first design
- Automatic issue tracking
- Cycles (sprints)
- Projects & milestones
- Custom workflows
- API & webhooks
- Built-in roadmaps
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cody
- AI code assistance with context drawn from a whole private codebasenot Linear
- Code search and navigation across many repositoriesnot Linear
- Large scale code migrations and modernisation with Batch Changesnot Linear
Linear
- Issue management and triage, converting customer feedback into prioritized issuesnot Cody
- Strategic planning via initiatives, roadmaps, and PRDs from idea to launchnot Cody
- Agent-assisted development, with agents drafting docs and submitting pull requestsnot Cody
- Code review with structural diffs for human and agent outputnot Cody
- Progress monitoring via dashboards tracking cycle times and project healthnot Cody
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cody
- Sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page
- sourcegraph.com/cody redirects to the documentation rather than a Cody product or pricing page
- AI features are metered as credits included per user, and exceeding the allocation requires buying a higher volume bucket
- Volume credit buckets are sold as an add-on rather than included
- A customer success manager and premium support are optional paid extras on top of the Enterprise plan
- Standard support is 24x5 rather than 24x7, with round-the-clock coverage sold as an upgrade
- The published $16K figure is a starting price that scales with team size, so the actual cost is quoted rather than listed
Linear
- No task-level Gantt chart; Timeline view is available for projects only, not individual issues
- No native time-tracking or hour-logging feature
- No native Linux desktop app; official FAQ states it 'may come in the future but it's not on the roadmap for now'
- Free tier capped at 250 issues and 2 teams
Pricing, plan by plan
Cody
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cody review.
Linear
Free- FreeFree
- Unlimited members
- 2 teams
- 250 issues
- Basic$10/month
- 5 teams
- Unlimited issues
- Unlimited file uploads
- Business$16/month
- Unlimited teams
- Private teams/guests
- Triage Intelligence
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- SAML/SCIM
- Granular admin controls
- Invoice/PO billing
Which should you pick?
Choose Linear if
- You need fast, real-time sync.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, macOS, Windows.
- You also want keyboard-first design.
Questions people ask
- Is Cody or Linear better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cody starts at Free and Linear at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cody or Linear?
- Cody starts at Free and Linear at Free.
- Does Cody or Linear run on more platforms?
- Cody runs on Web. Linear runs on Web, iOS, Android, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use Cody for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cody best used for?
- Cody is most often used for ai code assistance with context drawn from a whole private codebase, code search and navigation across many repositories, large scale code migrations and modernisation with batch changes. Of those, ai code assistance with context drawn from a whole private codebase and code search and navigation across many repositories are not what Linear is typically brought in for.
- What can Cody do that Linear cannot?
- Linear covers Fast, real-time sync, Keyboard-first design, Automatic issue tracking, Cycles (sprints).
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Cody vs Visual Studio Code
- Cody vs ESLint
- Cody vs pnpm
- Cody vs Turborepo
- Cody vs Yarn
- Cody vs Ansible
- Cody vs Prettier
- Cody vs Vite
- Cody vs Webpack
- Cody vs Argo CD
- Cody vs Azure DevOps
- Cody vs Bitbucket
- Cody vs Buildkite
- Cody vs Claude Code
- Cody vs Deno
- Cody vs Fig
- Cody vs Git
- Cody vs GitHub Copilot
- Cody vs Asana
- Cody vs ClickUp
- Cody vs Figma
- Cody vs Monday.com
- Cody vs Greenhouse
- Cody vs Notion
- Cody vs Amplitude
- Cody vs Datadog
- Cody vs PostHog
- Cody vs PyCharm
- Cody vs Sketch
- Cody vs Docker
- Cody vs Netlify
- Cody vs Okta
- Cody vs Aha!
- Cody vs Coda
- Cody vs Dashlane
- Cody vs GitHub
- Linear vs Visual Studio Code
- Linear vs ESLint
- Linear vs pnpm
- Linear vs Turborepo
- Linear vs Yarn
- Linear vs Ansible
- Linear vs Prettier
- Linear vs Vite
- Linear vs Webpack
- Linear vs Argo CD
- Linear vs Azure DevOps
- Linear vs Bitbucket
- Linear vs Buildkite
- Linear vs Claude Code
- Linear vs Deno
- Linear vs Fig
- Linear vs Git
- Linear vs GitHub Copilot
- Linear vs Asana
- Linear vs ClickUp
- Linear vs Figma
- Linear vs Monday.com
- Linear vs Greenhouse
- Linear vs Notion
- Linear vs Amplitude
- Linear vs Datadog
- Linear vs PostHog
- Linear vs PyCharm
- Linear vs Sketch
- Linear vs Docker
- Linear vs Netlify
- Linear vs Okta
- Linear vs Aha!
- Linear vs Coda
- Linear vs Dashlane
- Linear vs GitHub


