Log Management · head to head
CloudWatch vs Splunk
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CloudWatch the free tier covers 5 GB of log ingestion and 10 custom metrics a month, after which log ingestion is $0.50 per GB from 5 to 30 GB; Splunk no prices are published on any plan; every model requires contacting sales for an estimate
- They diverge on capability: CloudWatch covers Metrics collection, Splunk covers Real-time monitoring.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CloudWatch and Splunk actually diverge.
| Attribute | CloudWatch | Splunk |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Log Management | Network & Connectivity |
| Founded | 2006 | 2003 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (usage-based), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CloudWatch
- Metrics collection
- Dashboards
- Alarms and notifications
Only in Splunk
- Real-time monitoring
- Data visualization
- Full-text search
- Custom dashboards
- Alert management
- Anomaly detection
- Log parsing
Both cover
- Log aggregation
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CloudWatch
- Metrics and log collection for AWS workloadsnot Splunk
- Alarming on thresholds across AWS servicesnot Splunk
- Querying logs with Logs Insightsnot Splunk
- Live tailing logs during an incidentnot Splunk
- Distributed tracing alongside X-Raynot Splunk
Splunk
- Log search and analysis across infrastructurenot CloudWatch
- SIEM, SOAR and UEBA for a security operations teamnot CloudWatch
- Application performance and infrastructure monitoringnot CloudWatch
- Cloud, private cloud or on-premises deploymentnot CloudWatch
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CloudWatch
- The free tier covers 5 GB of log ingestion and 10 custom metrics a month, after which log ingestion is $0.50 per GB from 5 to 30 GB
- Custom metrics are $0.30 each for the first 10,000, so instrumenting broadly gets expensive before volume discounts apply
- Each custom dashboard beyond the free three is $3 a month
- Alarms are billed at $0.10 per alarm metric a month, with high-resolution alarms costing more
- Log storage beyond the free 5 GB is $0.03 per GB per month on top of the ingestion charge
Splunk
- No prices are published on any plan; every model requires contacting sales for an estimate
- Three separate pricing models, workload, ingest and entity, so the same deployment costs different amounts depending on which was signed
- Ingest pricing bills on data volume, so cost tracks how much you log rather than how much value you get from it
- Security, observability and platform are priced separately
Pricing, plan by plan
CloudWatch
Free- FreeFree
- Metrics collection
- Log aggregation
- Dashboards
Splunk
Free- FreeFree
- Log aggregation
- Real-time monitoring
- Data visualization
Which should you pick?
Choose CloudWatch if
- You need metrics collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want dashboards.
Choose Splunk if
- You need real-time monitoring.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want data visualization.
Questions people ask
- Is CloudWatch or Splunk better?
- Neither clearly leads. CloudWatch starts at Free and Splunk at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CloudWatch or Splunk?
- CloudWatch starts at Free and Splunk at Free.
- Does CloudWatch or Splunk run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use CloudWatch for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is CloudWatch best used for?
- CloudWatch is most often used for metrics and log collection for aws workloads, alarming on thresholds across aws services, querying logs with logs insights, live tailing logs during an incident. Of those, metrics and log collection for aws workloads and alarming on thresholds across aws services are not what Splunk is typically brought in for.
- What can CloudWatch do that Splunk cannot?
- CloudWatch covers Metrics collection, Dashboards, Alarms and notifications. Splunk covers Real-time monitoring, Data visualization, Full-text search, Custom dashboards. Both handle Log aggregation, API, Webhooks, REST.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- CloudWatch vs Elastic Stack
- CloudWatch vs New Relic
- CloudWatch vs Datadog Logs
- CloudWatch vs Coralogix
- CloudWatch vs Grafana Loki
- CloudWatch vs Dynatrace
- CloudWatch vs InfluxDB
- CloudWatch vs Airbrake
- CloudWatch vs AppDynamics
- CloudWatch vs Axiom
- CloudWatch vs Azure Monitor
- CloudWatch vs Better Stack
- CloudWatch vs Bugsnag
- CloudWatch vs Dynatrace Logs
- CloudWatch vs Elastic
- CloudWatch vs Elastic APM
- CloudWatch vs Elasticsearch Service
- CloudWatch vs ELK Stack
- CloudWatch vs Prometheus
- CloudWatch vs Cloudflare
- CloudWatch vs Consul
- CloudWatch vs Grafana
- CloudWatch vs Ivanti
- CloudWatch vs Palo Alto Networks
- CloudWatch vs Tailscale
- CloudWatch vs Traefik
- CloudWatch vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Splunk vs Elastic Stack
- Splunk vs New Relic
- Splunk vs Datadog Logs
- Splunk vs Coralogix
- Splunk vs Grafana Loki
- Splunk vs Dynatrace
- Splunk vs InfluxDB
- Splunk vs Airbrake
- Splunk vs AppDynamics
- Splunk vs Axiom
- Splunk vs Azure Monitor
- Splunk vs Better Stack
- Splunk vs Bugsnag
- Splunk vs Dynatrace Logs
- Splunk vs Elastic
- Splunk vs Elastic APM
- Splunk vs Elasticsearch Service
- Splunk vs ELK Stack
- Splunk vs Prometheus
- Splunk vs Cloudflare
- Splunk vs Consul
- Splunk vs Grafana
- Splunk vs Ivanti
- Splunk vs Palo Alto Networks
- Splunk vs Tailscale
- Splunk vs Traefik
- Splunk vs Ubiquiti UniFi


