Cloud · head to head
Cilium vs Zeabur

Cilium
Cloud
eBPF-based networking, observability and security for Kubernetes
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cilium requires a recent Linux kernel, which rules out older distributions and some managed environments; Zeabur free plan limited to single server with 48-hour log retention
- They diverge on capability: Cilium covers eBPF datapath, Zeabur covers AI Agent.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cilium and Zeabur actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cilium
- eBPF datapath
- Identity-based policy
- Hubble observability
- Sidecar-free mesh
Only in Zeabur
- AI Agent
- Managed Servers
- Domain and DNS Management
- Email Service
- AI Hub
- Deploy Templates
- Git Integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cilium
- Kubernetes networking at a scale where iptables-based CNI performance degradesnot Zeabur
- Network policy expressed on workload identity rather than fragile IP rulesnot Zeabur
- Seeing which services actually talk to each other, and what policy is droppingnot Zeabur
Zeabur
- Deploying full-stack web applications without DevOps expertisenot Cilium
- Building AI agent infrastructure with integrated API accessnot Cilium
- Managing multi-region deployments with automated scalingnot Cilium
- Running containerized services with built-in domain and emailnot Cilium
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cilium
- Requires a recent Linux kernel, which rules out older distributions and some managed environments
- eBPF is genuinely hard to debug when it misbehaves, and the skill is rare on most teams
- Broad scope — CNI, policy, mesh, observability — means the learning curve covers several domains at once
Zeabur
- Free plan limited to single server with 48-hour log retention
- Small team size may limit support and feature velocity
- Building spec upgrades limited on lower tiers
- Enterprise support not clearly documented
Pricing, plan by plan
Cilium
Free- CiliumFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Zeabur
Free- FreeFree
- 1 manageable server
- 2C4G build specs
- 48-hour log retention
- Dev$5/month
- 3 manageable servers
- 7-day log retention
- 250 MB file uploads
- Pro$19/month
- 10 manageable servers
- 4C8G build specs
- 30-day log retention
- Team$79/month
- 3 included seats
- Unlimited manageable servers
- 90-day log retention
Which should you pick?
Choose Cilium if
- You need ebpf datapath.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, Linux.
- You also want identity-based policy.
Choose Zeabur if
- You need ai agent.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI.
- You also want managed servers.
Questions people ask
- Is Cilium or Zeabur better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cilium starts at Free and Zeabur at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cilium or Zeabur?
- Cilium starts at Free and Zeabur at Free.
- Does Cilium or Zeabur run on more platforms?
- Cilium runs on Kubernetes, Linux. Zeabur runs on Web, CLI.
- Can I use Cilium for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cilium best used for?
- Cilium is most often used for kubernetes networking at a scale where iptables-based cni performance degrades, network policy expressed on workload identity rather than fragile ip rules, seeing which services actually talk to each other, and what policy is dropping. Of those, kubernetes networking at a scale where iptables-based cni performance degrades and network policy expressed on workload identity rather than fragile ip rules are not what Zeabur is typically brought in for.
- What can Cilium do that Zeabur cannot?
- Cilium covers eBPF datapath, Identity-based policy, Hubble observability, Sidecar-free mesh. Zeabur covers AI Agent, Managed Servers, Domain and DNS Management, Email Service.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cilium: Is Cilium free?
Yes, open source and CNCF-graduated. Isovalent sells an enterprise distribution and support.
Zeabur: What is included in the free plan?
The free plan includes 1 manageable server, 2C4G build specifications, 48-hour log retention, 50 MB file upload limit, and community support.
SourceCilium: What does eBPF change?
It lets Cilium run packet-processing programs inside the kernel instead of relying on iptables rule chains, which behave poorly as the number of services grows.
Zeabur: How do additional seats work on the Team plan?
The Team plan includes 3 seats with additional seats available at $24 per seat per month.
SourceCilium: Does Cilium replace a service mesh?
It can cover much of what a mesh does without sidecars, though full mesh feature sets still favour Istio or Linkerd.
Zeabur: Is there a free trial period?
The Dev and Pro plans include 14 days free before billing begins.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Cilium vs Grafana Cloud
- Cilium vs Neon
- Cilium vs DigitalOcean
- Cilium vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Cilium vs Pulumi
- Cilium vs Fly.io
- Cilium vs Anyscale
- Cilium vs Fireworks AI
- Cilium vs Podman
- Cilium vs Railway
- Cilium vs Render
- Cilium vs Vault
- Cilium vs Wiz
- Cilium vs Beam Cloud
- Cilium vs Cerebrium
- Cilium vs DeepInfra
- Cilium vs Go
- Cilium vs Azure Functions
- Zeabur vs Grafana Cloud
- Zeabur vs Neon
- Zeabur vs DigitalOcean
- Zeabur vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Zeabur vs Pulumi
- Zeabur vs Fly.io
- Zeabur vs Anyscale
- Zeabur vs Fireworks AI
- Zeabur vs Podman
- Zeabur vs Railway
- Zeabur vs Render
- Zeabur vs Vault
- Zeabur vs Wiz
- Zeabur vs Beam Cloud
- Zeabur vs Cerebrium
- Zeabur vs DeepInfra
- Zeabur vs Go
- Zeabur vs Azure Functions

