Cloud · head to head
Cilium vs Wasabi

Cilium
Cloud
eBPF-based networking, observability and security for Kubernetes
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Cilium has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Cilium requires a recent Linux kernel, which rules out older distributions and some managed environments; Wasabi 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- They diverge on capability: Cilium covers eBPF datapath, Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cilium and Wasabi actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cilium
- eBPF datapath
- Identity-based policy
- Hubble observability
- Sidecar-free mesh
Only in Wasabi
- Hot Cloud Storage
- S3 Compatible API
- Object Lock
- Versioning
- Multi-region
- Data Migration Tools
- Immutability
- Ransomware Protection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cilium
- Kubernetes networking at a scale where iptables-based CNI performance degradesnot Wasabi
- Network policy expressed on workload identity rather than fragile IP rulesnot Wasabi
- Seeing which services actually talk to each other, and what policy is droppingnot Wasabi
Wasabi
- Backup and recoverynot Cilium
- Media storagenot Cilium
- Archive replacementnot Cilium
- Ransomware protectionnot Cilium
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cilium
- Requires a recent Linux kernel, which rules out older distributions and some managed environments
- eBPF is genuinely hard to debug when it misbehaves, and the skill is rare on most teams
- Broad scope — CNI, policy, mesh, observability — means the learning curve covers several domains at once
Wasabi
- 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- Significantly smaller global footprint than AWS with only 16 regions, resulting in higher latency for users in underserved regions
- Performance can degrade with high-volume transactions requiring throughput management strategies
- Hot storage only, no cold/archival storage tier for long-term data at lower cost
- Support responsiveness gaps with teams experiencing multi-day waits for critical issue resolution
Pricing, plan by plan
Cilium
Free- CiliumFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Wasabi
$7.99/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Wasabi review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Cilium if
- You need ebpf datapath.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, Linux.
- You also want identity-based policy.
Choose Wasabi if
- You need hot cloud storage.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want s3 compatible api.
Questions people ask
- Is Cilium or Wasabi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cilium starts at Free and Wasabi at $7.99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cilium or Wasabi?
- Cilium has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Cilium and $7.99/month for Wasabi.
- Does Cilium or Wasabi run on more platforms?
- Cilium runs on Kubernetes, Linux. Wasabi runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Cilium for free?
- Yes. Cilium has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Wasabi starts at $7.99/month.
- What is Cilium best used for?
- Cilium is most often used for kubernetes networking at a scale where iptables-based cni performance degrades, network policy expressed on workload identity rather than fragile ip rules, seeing which services actually talk to each other, and what policy is dropping. Of those, kubernetes networking at a scale where iptables-based cni performance degrades and network policy expressed on workload identity rather than fragile ip rules are not what Wasabi is typically brought in for.
- What can Cilium do that Wasabi cannot?
- Cilium covers eBPF datapath, Identity-based policy, Hubble observability, Sidecar-free mesh. Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage, S3 Compatible API, Object Lock, Versioning.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cilium: Is Cilium free?
Yes, open source and CNCF-graduated. Isovalent sells an enterprise distribution and support.
Wasabi: What is Wasabi's pricing structure?
Wasabi offers pay-as-you-go pricing at $7.99 per TB per month as of July 2026, with no egress or API request fees. Reserved capacity plans are available for multi-year terms with volume discounts.
SourceCilium: What does eBPF change?
It lets Cilium run packet-processing programs inside the kernel instead of relying on iptables rule chains, which behave poorly as the number of services grows.
Wasabi: Does Wasabi charge for data downloads or API calls?
No. Wasabi includes zero egress fees and zero API request fees, which is a major cost advantage over AWS S3. Customers can plan their budget to the penny without worrying about surprise data transfer charges.
SourceCilium: Does Cilium replace a service mesh?
It can cover much of what a mesh does without sidecars, though full mesh feature sets still favour Istio or Linkerd.
Wasabi: Is there a minimum storage duration requirement?
Yes. Wasabi enforces a 90-day minimum storage term. Users who delete data before 90 days are still charged for the full 90-day period.
SourceWasabi: Is Wasabi S3-compatible?
Yes. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is fully S3-compatible, meaning organizations can integrate it into existing workflows without rewriting application code used with AWS S3.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cilium vs Podman
- Cilium vs K3s
- Cilium vs Akamai
- Cilium vs Crossplane
- Cilium vs OpenEBS
- Cilium vs DigitalOcean
- Cilium vs Portworx
- Cilium vs Vault
- Cilium vs Fastly
- Cilium vs HAProxy
- Cilium vs Hetzner Cloud
- Cilium vs Infracost
- Cilium vs Lambda
- Cilium vs Linode
- Cilium vs Northflank
- Cilium vs Oracle Cloud
- Cilium vs Buildah
- Cilium vs Rancher
- Cilium vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Cilium vs Scaleway
- Cilium vs Vultr
- Cilium vs Zeabur
- Cilium vs Porter
- Cilium vs Contabo
- Cilium vs Encore
- Cilium vs Google Cloud Platform
- Cilium vs Microsoft Azure
- Cilium vs IBM Cloud
- Cilium vs kind
- Cilium vs Koyeb
- Cilium vs Kustomize
- Cilium vs Linkerd
- Wasabi vs Podman
- Wasabi vs K3s
- Wasabi vs Akamai
- Wasabi vs Crossplane
- Wasabi vs OpenEBS
- Wasabi vs DigitalOcean
- Wasabi vs Portworx
- Wasabi vs Vault
- Wasabi vs Fastly
- Wasabi vs HAProxy
- Wasabi vs Hetzner Cloud
- Wasabi vs Infracost
- Wasabi vs Lambda
- Wasabi vs Linode
- Wasabi vs Northflank
- Wasabi vs Oracle Cloud
- Wasabi vs Buildah
- Wasabi vs Rancher
- Wasabi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Wasabi vs Scaleway
- Wasabi vs Vultr
- Wasabi vs Zeabur
- Wasabi vs Porter
- Wasabi vs Contabo
- Wasabi vs Encore
- Wasabi vs Google Cloud Platform
- Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure
- Wasabi vs IBM Cloud
- Wasabi vs kind
- Wasabi vs Koyeb
- Wasabi vs Kustomize
- Wasabi vs Linkerd

