Cloud · head to head
HAProxy vs Zeabur
The short version
- Each has a real cost: HAProxy configuration syntax is dense and unforgiving, with a steep initial learning curve; Zeabur free plan limited to single server with 48-hour log retention
- They diverge on capability: HAProxy covers High throughput, Zeabur covers AI Agent.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which HAProxy and Zeabur actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in HAProxy
- High throughput
- Layer 4 and 7
- Health checking
- Rate limiting and ACLs
Only in Zeabur
- AI Agent
- Managed Servers
- Domain and DNS Management
- Email Service
- AI Hub
- Deploy Templates
- Git Integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
HAProxy
- Load balancing at traffic levels where proxy efficiency shows up in the hardware billnot Zeabur
- Precise traffic control — rate limits, sticky sessions, complex routing rulesnot Zeabur
- TCP load balancing for databases and non-HTTP servicesnot Zeabur
Zeabur
- Deploying full-stack web applications without DevOps expertisenot HAProxy
- Building AI agent infrastructure with integrated API accessnot HAProxy
- Managing multi-region deployments with automated scalingnot HAProxy
- Running containerized services with built-in domain and emailnot HAProxy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
HAProxy
- Configuration syntax is dense and unforgiving, with a steep initial learning curve
- No automatic certificate management, unlike newer servers that treat it as default behaviour
- The built-in stats page is basic, so real observability needs exporters and dashboards
- A dedicated load balancer is more machinery than small deployments need
Zeabur
- Free plan limited to single server with 48-hour log retention
- Small team size may limit support and feature velocity
- Building spec upgrades limited on lower tiers
- Enterprise support not clearly documented
Pricing, plan by plan
HAProxy
Free- HAProxyFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Zeabur
Free- FreeFree
- 1 manageable server
- 2C4G build specs
- 48-hour log retention
- Dev$5/month
- 3 manageable servers
- 7-day log retention
- 250 MB file uploads
- Pro$19/month
- 10 manageable servers
- 4C8G build specs
- 30-day log retention
- Team$79/month
- 3 included seats
- Unlimited manageable servers
- 90-day log retention
Which should you pick?
Choose HAProxy if
- You need high throughput.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want layer 4 and 7.
Choose Zeabur if
- You need ai agent.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI.
- You also want managed servers.
Questions people ask
- Is HAProxy or Zeabur better?
- Neither clearly leads. HAProxy starts at Free and Zeabur at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, HAProxy or Zeabur?
- HAProxy starts at Free and Zeabur at Free.
- Does HAProxy or Zeabur run on more platforms?
- HAProxy runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted. Zeabur runs on Web, CLI.
- Can I use HAProxy for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is HAProxy best used for?
- HAProxy is most often used for load balancing at traffic levels where proxy efficiency shows up in the hardware bill, precise traffic control — rate limits, sticky sessions, complex routing rules, tcp load balancing for databases and non-http services. Of those, load balancing at traffic levels where proxy efficiency shows up in the hardware bill and precise traffic control — rate limits, sticky sessions, complex routing rules are not what Zeabur is typically brought in for.
- What can HAProxy do that Zeabur cannot?
- HAProxy covers High throughput, Layer 4 and 7, Health checking, Rate limiting and ACLs. Zeabur covers AI Agent, Managed Servers, Domain and DNS Management, Email Service.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
HAProxy: Is HAProxy free?
Yes, the community version is open source. HAProxy Technologies sells HAProxy Enterprise separately.
Zeabur: What is included in the free plan?
The free plan includes 1 manageable server, 2C4G build specifications, 48-hour log retention, 50 MB file upload limit, and community support.
SourceHAProxy: HAProxy or Nginx?
HAProxy is a specialist load balancer with deeper balancing and health-check features. Nginx also serves static content and is more approachable, which is why it is more common as a general web server.
Zeabur: How do additional seats work on the Team plan?
The Team plan includes 3 seats with additional seats available at $24 per seat per month.
SourceHAProxy: Does HAProxy handle TLS certificates automatically?
No. Certificate issuance and renewal are external, unlike Caddy where it is automatic.
Zeabur: Is there a free trial period?
The Dev and Pro plans include 14 days free before billing begins.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- HAProxy vs Grafana Cloud
- HAProxy vs Neon
- HAProxy vs DigitalOcean
- HAProxy vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- HAProxy vs Pulumi
- HAProxy vs Fly.io
- HAProxy vs Anyscale
- HAProxy vs Fireworks AI
- HAProxy vs Podman
- HAProxy vs Railway
- HAProxy vs Render
- HAProxy vs Vault
- HAProxy vs Wiz
- HAProxy vs Beam Cloud
- HAProxy vs Cerebrium
- HAProxy vs DeepInfra
- HAProxy vs Go
- HAProxy vs Azure Functions
- Zeabur vs Grafana Cloud
- Zeabur vs Neon
- Zeabur vs DigitalOcean
- Zeabur vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Zeabur vs Pulumi
- Zeabur vs Fly.io
- Zeabur vs Anyscale
- Zeabur vs Fireworks AI
- Zeabur vs Podman
- Zeabur vs Railway
- Zeabur vs Render
- Zeabur vs Vault
- Zeabur vs Wiz
- Zeabur vs Beam Cloud
- Zeabur vs Cerebrium
- Zeabur vs DeepInfra
- Zeabur vs Go
- Zeabur vs Azure Functions


