Cybersecurity · head to head
Chainguard vs OpenVPN

Chainguard
Cybersecurity
Secure-by-default open source software with hardened container images and libraries
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

OpenVPN
Networking
Open source VPN protocol with a commercial Access Server product priced per simultaneous connection
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Chainguard containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people; OpenVPN open source OpenVPN, while free, requires real technical skill to configure, secure and maintain without the Access Server admin layer
- They diverge on capability: Chainguard covers Hardened container images, OpenVPN covers Open source core.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Chainguard and OpenVPN actually diverge.
| Attribute | Chainguard | OpenVPN |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Licensing by artifact type and team size | Open source core is free; Access Server billed per simultaneous connection |
| Platforms | Cloud, Container, VM | Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Networking |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Chainguard
- Hardened container images
- CVE remediation SLA
- SLSA L2/L3 builds
- Sigstore signatures
- SBOM generation
- Language libraries
- VM images
- Artifact scanning
Only in OpenVPN
- Open source core
- Access Server admin UI
- Per-connection licensing
- Free tier
- Cross-platform clients
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Chainguard
- Deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surfacenot OpenVPN
- Meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industriesnot OpenVPN
- Reducing CVE exposure with contractual remediation guaranteesnot OpenVPN
- Building secure language packages with automatic backportsnot OpenVPN
- Verifying artifact provenance with Sigstore signaturesnot OpenVPN
OpenVPN
- A technical team wanting a fully free, self-configured VPN server using the open source protocol without any vendor relationshipnot Chainguard
- A small business wanting a supported, easier-to-administer VPN server, willing to pay per concurrent connection rather than per employeenot Chainguard
- An organisation with more staff than typical concurrent VPN usage, since Access Server bills only active simultaneous connections, not total accountsnot Chainguard
- An IoT or large-scale deployment needing custom Enterprise pricing above 2,000 connectionsnot Chainguard
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Chainguard
- Containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people
- Per-image pricing for containers requires custom quotes with no transparency
- Free tier limited to 5 container images for testing
- Libraries pricing by ecosystem and developer count lacks transparent per-developer cost
- VM image catalog pricing opacity makes cost estimation difficult
OpenVPN
- Open source OpenVPN, while free, requires real technical skill to configure, secure and maintain without the Access Server admin layer
- Per-connection billing on Access Server means usage spikes, such as an all-hands remote day, can push simultaneous connections over a licensed limit and block new connections until usage drops or the plan is upgraded
- OpenVPN's traditional hub-and-spoke architecture routes traffic through a central server, unlike mesh VPN tools like Tailscale or NetBird that establish direct peer-to-peer connections where possible, which can add latency
- Client configuration and certificate management for the open source version is more manual and error-prone than newer VPN tools with zero-config onboarding
- Access Server pricing above the Growth tier reverts to custom Enterprise quoting, so very large deployments lose the pricing transparency of the lower tiers
- The protocol's throughput is generally lower than newer kernel-integrated protocols like WireGuard under equivalent conditions, which matters for high-bandwidth use cases
Pricing, plan by plan
Chainguard
Free- Free TierFree
- Five container images to test and deploy
- Containers Per-Image$undefined/custom
- Licensed by quantity and type
- Base images, application images, AI/ML images, FIPS variants
- Custom pricing per image
- Containers Catalog$19000/year
- For 10-person engineering teams
- 2,000+ container images
- Contractual CVE remediation SLAs
- Libraries Licensing$undefined/custom
- Licensed by ecosystem (Python, Java, JavaScript)
- Licensed by developer count
- Unlimited pulls with no metering
OpenVPN
Free- Access Server FreeFree
- Up to 2 simultaneous connections
- All features included
- Access Server Growth$7/month
- Per simultaneous connection beyond the free tier
- Annual billing
- Access Server Enterprise/IoT$undefined/month
- Custom pricing for 2,000+ connections
Which should you pick?
Choose Chainguard if
- You need hardened container images.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Container, VM.
- You also want cve remediation sla.
Choose OpenVPN if
- You need open source core.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android.
- You also want access server admin ui.
Questions people ask
- Is Chainguard or OpenVPN better?
- Neither clearly leads. Chainguard starts at Free and OpenVPN at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Chainguard or OpenVPN?
- Chainguard starts at Free and OpenVPN at Free.
- Does Chainguard or OpenVPN run on more platforms?
- Chainguard runs on Cloud, Container, VM. OpenVPN runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Chainguard for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Chainguard best used for?
- Chainguard is most often used for deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface, meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries, reducing cve exposure with contractual remediation guarantees, building secure language packages with automatic backports. Of those, deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface and meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries are not what OpenVPN is typically brought in for.
- What can Chainguard do that OpenVPN cannot?
- Chainguard covers Hardened container images, CVE remediation SLA, SLSA L2/L3 builds, Sigstore signatures. OpenVPN covers Open source core, Access Server admin UI, Per-connection licensing, Free tier.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Chainguard: How much is the Chainguard Containers Catalog?
The Containers Catalog is 19,000 USD per year for 10-person engineering teams, providing access to 2,000+ hardened container images.
SourceOpenVPN: Is OpenVPN free?
The open source protocol and software are free under the GPL; Access Server, the commercial packaged product, charges per simultaneous connection beyond a free 2-connection tier.
Chainguard: What SLAs does Chainguard offer?
Chainguard provides contractual CVE remediation SLAs: 7 days for critical vulnerabilities, 14 days for high/medium/low severity, all with priority support.
SourceOpenVPN: What counts as a connection for billing purposes?
A simultaneously active connected device, not a registered user account or total device count; unlimited accounts and devices can be created but only the licensed number can be connected at once.
Chainguard: Can I try Chainguard before purchasing?
Yes. The free tier includes five container images for testing and deployment, allowing hands-on evaluation.
SourceOpenVPN: How does OpenVPN compare with WireGuard-based tools like Tailscale?
OpenVPN uses a traditional hub-and-spoke VPN architecture rather than the mesh, peer-to-peer approach used by newer tools like Tailscale or NetBird.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Chainguard vs Snyk
- Chainguard vs Trivy
- Chainguard vs Doppler
- Chainguard vs Infisical
- Chainguard vs Grype
- Chainguard vs Arnica
- Chainguard vs HashiCorp Vault
- Chainguard vs Bitwarden
- Chainguard vs Semgrep
- Chainguard vs Authelia
- Chainguard vs Endor Labs
- Chainguard vs Tenable
- Chainguard vs Hanwha Vision
- Chainguard vs Idira
- Chainguard vs IVPN
- Chainguard vs Logto
- Chainguard vs Malwarebytes
- Chainguard vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Chainguard vs pfSense
- Chainguard vs ZeroTier
- Chainguard vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Chainguard vs Tailscale
- Chainguard vs Icinga
- Chainguard vs Zabbix
- Chainguard vs Domotz
- Chainguard vs LibreNMS
- Chainguard vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Chainguard vs Twingate
- Chainguard vs Consul
- Chainguard vs OPNsense
- Chainguard vs Nebula
- Chainguard vs ngrok
- Chainguard vs Palo Alto Networks
- Chainguard vs Splunk
- OpenVPN vs Snyk
- OpenVPN vs Trivy
- OpenVPN vs Doppler
- OpenVPN vs Infisical
- OpenVPN vs Grype
- OpenVPN vs Arnica
- OpenVPN vs HashiCorp Vault
- OpenVPN vs Bitwarden
- OpenVPN vs Semgrep
- OpenVPN vs Authelia
- OpenVPN vs Endor Labs
- OpenVPN vs Tenable
- OpenVPN vs Hanwha Vision
- OpenVPN vs Idira
- OpenVPN vs IVPN
- OpenVPN vs Logto
- OpenVPN vs Malwarebytes
- OpenVPN vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- OpenVPN vs pfSense
- OpenVPN vs ZeroTier
- OpenVPN vs MikroTik RouterOS
- OpenVPN vs Tailscale
- OpenVPN vs Icinga
- OpenVPN vs Zabbix
- OpenVPN vs Domotz
- OpenVPN vs LibreNMS
- OpenVPN vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- OpenVPN vs Twingate
- OpenVPN vs Consul
- OpenVPN vs OPNsense
- OpenVPN vs Nebula
- OpenVPN vs ngrok
- OpenVPN vs Palo Alto Networks
- OpenVPN vs Splunk
